A Message for Alex Salmond

(For “company” sing “SNP”.)

I’m part of the Union for the time being. The end credits are in German to remind us that we are still part of that other Union – one which most people really don’t want to be in, but we never get a referendum.

So, now we can all relax north of the border. Everything will be just fine, like all the ‘No’ literature said. Pensions are safe [like they could be any lower]. Schools are safe [indoctrination is safe]. The pound is safe [snigger]. The NHS is safe [raucous laughter].

Together, we can once again make a quarter of the globe pink. Actually, the UK Government has been helping to make the whole world pink.

When I say I’m “part of the Union” it’s because there was no choice this time. A perpetually socialist Scotland, currently led by a chubby tinpot dictator who routinely ignores the wishes of the people, wants ruled from Brussels and seems to have a bigger fetish for unlimited immigration than Blair meant there was no choice.

Not that the UK run by traitors and dictated to by the EU and UN is anything to get excited about either, but it gives us the chance to defeat the tyranny together. Maybe, in the future, when the World is a safer place (e.g. when the European Union and Council of Europe have collapsed under the weight of their own legislation, deceit and fraud) Scottish people, myself included, might find that the time is right for the constituent parts of the UK to become truly independent, but to keep a Union alive by way of a ‘special relationship’.

Long before that happens, I may be departing the UK. Plans are being drawn for various options for MY future and one of those is to leave the double tyranny of Salmond’s Scotland and the LibLabCon’s UK to move overseas.

If so many Scots want to be nannied to death by socialist governments, why don’t they start interviewing the various contenders for a Scottish monarch: members of the House of Stuart, like the Duchess of Alba? At least that way, we might get benevolent kings and queens who actually care, like a real nanny, unlike the Marxist-Leninist ‘nanny’ whose ‘care’ and ‘concern’ are only Trojan horses to fill our lives with control and fear.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Scottish ‘Independence’ or The EU Knighted Kingdom?

Modified Union Flag without the blue of ScotlandUnless you have spent the past couple of years in Fingal’s Cave, you will know that today could herald the beginning of the end of over 300 years of this United Kingdom and make Alex Salmond an unlikely modern-day William Wallace. For a short time.

Or we will remain as the full United Kingdom (less most of Ireland, which left nearly a century ago). The leaders of the LibLabCon Party have all been in Scotland recently to campaign for a ‘No’ vote. Suddenly they care about us. Or do they?

Personally, I believe that devolution was intended to produce a total break-up of the UK to weaken this (once) beacon of hope anchored just offshore from a continent which has produced quite a few individuals who were determined to control as much of it as possible through warfare.

It’s different this time only in that the empire-builders are using their brains rather than their (armed forces’) brawn. They have used schools and ‘entertainment’ to dumb down the past couple of generations; mass immigration to dilute patriotism and to divide and conquer; their friends in the media to instill fear into acceptance and appreciation of the EU.

I more-or-less got to the nub of the issue (in my view) in my previous post:

Scotland is a very rich country, but ‘independence’ would leave us (more) impoverished under the yoke of incompetent and compromised politicians and weighed down by the EU ball and chain.

‘Independence’, as I have argued all along, is direct rule from Brussels cutting out the Westminster middlemen. Between the EU and the SNP in particular, I can envisage Scotland becoming the model police state for the World.

So can Leg-iron, who is writing a dystopic novel,

Since I decided on Scotland for Panoptica, the story is flying.

What does ‘independence’ mean when we are largely ruled by outsiders, politically, and much of what is inside Scotland is owned by people outside Scotland.

For example, Scotland is famous for alcohol. Production and over-consumption. But few of ‘our’ major companies appear to be Scottish-owned. Of about eight alcoholic drinks/companies I explored, all were owned by non-Scots, from island malts to ‘our’ two biggest brewers. Scottish Power is owned by the Spanish. The Bank of Scotland is owned by Lloyds as is Scottish Widows. Scotland’s three top-selling ‘newspapers’ are owned by the Sun and Mirror. Every major town centre comprises roughly the same shops owned by transnational corporations. And so on. Much of our land is foreign-owned:

HALF of Scotland is owned by just 500 people, few of whom are actually Scots.

Dick Puddlecote wrote about a Telegraph piece by Chris Snowdon: Whose child is it anyway? about a school in Yorkshire where packed lunches have been banned and concerning the head teacher’s use of the term “our children”,

She uses the term to imply ownership by her institution, perhaps even by the nation.

Here in Scotland, “Our children and grandchildren” is a popular phrase right now.

The ‘No’ camp says that “Our children and grandchildren will be better off if we stay in the Union”.

The ‘Yes’ camp insists that “Our children’s and grandchildren’s future will be more secure when we are free to make our own choices”, etc., etc.

So, these are ‘Scotland’s children’. The SNP ‘government’ is rolling out GIRFEC (Getting it right for every child), which means that every Scottish child will have a “Named Person” as a state nanny throughout their entire childhood; the person depends at what stage in life the child is at, but they will be free to share personal information about the child with other ‘agencies’ without approval from the parents.

Clearly, up here, “our children” and all future children are considered property of the state.

This is happening with or without indepretendence.

Anna Raccoon sheds some interesting light on what could happen if we really do get indepretendence. She starts off whimsically,

For a start, ‘freed from Westminster rule’ – you’ll get 59 belligerent Westminster MPs dumped back on you – and you’ll have to feed and house them. They’re a fiendishly expensive hobby, used to lavish expenses, and some of them have proved none too honest; we shan’t be contributing to their board and keep any longer – personally, we’ll be glad to see the back of them.

She then agrees with me and quite a number of ‘Yes’ men and women,

I don’t quite understand how ‘independence’ and ‘freed from Westminster rule’ equates with your desire to join the EU and live under the yoke of Brussels.

The former Commission President, Jacques Delors, predicted in July 1988 that within ten years 80% of economic legislation, and perhaps also fiscal and social legislation, would be of EC/EU origin.

At present it’s about 50%. So you’ll only be half free…but if that’s what you want, you’re welcome.

She also mentions that the UK skipped out of the Schengen agreement, but Scotland won’t be able to,

…but when Gretna Green is chock full of returning Syrian jihadists terrorising the neighbourhood, waiting to thump some Weeggie lorry driver over the head in order to have a chance of getting over the border into the UK – and you pull into a newly ‘independent Scottish’ petrol station near the border at midnight and find the pavement covered in sleeping figures in djellabas hidden under a mountain of old rags…wha’d’you mean it won’t happen?

Free movement in Europe and all that, my wee Jock pal, the only reason we concentrate our efforts on the English channel is because that is currently the favoured place of illegal entry – once the word gets out in Bamako that you can ‘just stroll into the UK’ from those beautiful heather covered mountains up in Scotland, and there is nothing stopping you travelling to Scotland…

Salmond wants lots and lots of immigration, which makes you wonder what he thinks is so wrong with Scotland being full of Scots. Sounds like he doesn’t actually like his fellow countrymen and women and their “children and grandchildren” very much.

Or is he another globalist puppet like Cameron, Blair et al intent on delivering global governance? Does the sun rise in the east every morning?

I believe he is a traitor, just like all recent UK Prime Ministers and many of their ministers and civil servants.

Leg-iron made an interesting point that now is maybe not the right time for Scottish independence, but maybe in the fairly near future. I’m sure we’ll have another chance if what the globalists want is a disunited kingdom, like the Irish had a second chance to vote for the Lisbon Treaty after voting the ‘wrong’ way the first time.

But what of a ‘No’ vote. What’s to become of this EU Knighted Kingdom, already weakened through decades of subversion, job-destroying legislation and policies designed to deliberately plunge us deeply into debt?

Unless UKIP can get into government and do what they have promised, the UK is guaranteed to go the same way as a perpetually socialist Scotland, governed out of Brussels and Geneva and signatories to every dodgy ‘legally-binding’  international environmental agreement, further destroying our industry and power supplies and every ‘human rights’ manifesto, further robbing us of basic freedoms to accommodate the whims of the latest Chosen Group.

As far as I can see, with the world a more dangerous place than I can remember, even at the height of the Cold War, the UK is becoming ever more divided, debt-ridden, demoralised and ripe for a take-over.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

As New Poll Puts ‘Yes’ Camp Ahead, Do Scots Know What is at Stake?

Alex Salmond leading pollsI haven’t written very much at all about the Scottish ‘independence’ referendum, because, like Frank Davis, I assumed that the ‘No’ votes would overwhelm the ‘Yes’, but…

Shock Poll: ‘Yes’ Camp Takes Lead in Scottish Independence Referendum.

After the undecideds have been removed from the equation, the YouGov poll for the Sunday Times, gives the yes campaign a lead of 51 percent to 49.

A ‘Yes’ vote would be just as planned. To break up the UK would be a serious victory for the global strategists in these times of coercing every country to abide by the same rules. Of course, at Westminster, they’ve been generally complying anyway, but with UKIP’s rise there’s at least the hope now that the damage can be reversed.

Not for an ‘independent’ Scotland, though. We have a very rich country here which could easily thrive with ‘normal’ people running things, but socialists (globalist puppets) would always be in charge and they subjugate and impoverish people.

We already know that the SNP ignores us (overturning wind farm planning permission refusals; ignoring their consultation on same-sex ‘marriage’) and wants to control us tightly, like the ‘named person’ for every child and the 50p per unit minimum price of alcohol.

They are also the ultimate watermelons: they propose that Scotland will be 100% powered by renewables by 2020. I’m sure they will participate fully in Agenda 21, if the decision to allow a eugenicist conference in the Scottish Parliament is anything to go by,

The radical group [Optimum Population Trust - now known as Population Matters] is urging First Minister Alex Salmond to launch a Government campaign to curb family size, using the slogan “two’s plenty”.

OPT is calling for Scotland’s population to be cut by a quarter.

I believe that they are likely to give in to such ideas – even a one-child policy. We know that Salmond would like half the World to live here, hence anyone from the EU, apart from England, Wales and N. Ireland, can already study here free. Scotland would soon become unrecognisable. Limiting family size would help his plans for mass immigration – indeed, it would be necessary to bring in younger people from abroad to do the work to pay the taxes to support the retired.

Scotland doesn’t have the same quality of dissenting voices as England does. I expect with indepretendence we would be up to our necks with socialism from alternate SNP and Labour governments obeying every command from the leftist EU, Council of Europe, UN agencies, climate change conferences, etc.

Scotland could be rich, like Norway and Switzerland, but I’m sure we would end up like an impoverished Soviet satellite state. I think it’s the wrong time and definitely the wrong people who will be ‘leading’ us.

The Darien scheme and much more recently, New Labour’s ‘Scottish Mafia’, show that we just haven’t had sufficiently intelligent people involved in politics in Scotland for centuries. If that ever changes and genuine independence is on offer then – and only then – would it be worth considering.

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

Shared Information: What’s Its Real Purpose?

Police want greater access to our medical records (and ‘other information’), as discovered by JuliaM. The Guardian reports,

Police want new and expanded rights to access medical records and other confidential data without an individual’s consent, a senior police chief has told the Guardian. Sir Peter Fahy, the Greater Manchester chief constable, said the extra access to sensitive data was needed to help police cope with growing numbers of vulnerable people.

Citing the usual care-and-concern-for-the-citizen line we have come to rely on as the excuse to trample over our rights.

Even the British Medical Association is against it as it breaches confidentiality and trust. As Julia writes,

…you know you’re on the wrong path when the BMA are saying ‘Woah there! That’s a bit too strong!’, don’t you?

If the ‘system’ was trustworthy, it might be a good idea, but unscrupulous officers could do a lot of damage with such information.

If someone is mentally ill, it is easier to pin a crime on them if the police are under pressure and the real perpetrator cannot be found?

That’s what happened to Barry George, who was found guilty of the murder of Crimewatch presenter Jill Dando.

But even before the case got to court there were concerns that the police, under immense pressure to catch Miss Dando’s killer, had been so desperate to secure a conviction that they had fallen into the trap of making the facts fit into their hypothesis, rather than forming a hypothesis based on the facts.

Whereas, previously:

He was immediately ruled out as a suspect, because police were certain the killer was a professional hitman hired by a jealous former boyfriend or gangster with a grudge against Crimewatch.

More recently, of course, it has been suggested that she was about to blow the lid off a BBC paedophile ring.

Mr George spent eight years in prison before finally being released for wrongful conviction. He was refused compensation ‘for not being innocent enough’!

I am also reminded of ‘social misfit’ Stefan Kiszko, who was jailed for sixteen years for a crime he could not have committed and sadly died the year after his release.

There have been calls for the past few years to make climate change ‘denial’ a mental illness.

In the future, anything could be reclassified as a mental disorder and people locked away, as happened in the Soviet Union to political dissidents. Access to medical records and ‘other information’ will only aid in that process of political persecution, which is almost certain to happen the way things are going.

Knowledge is power, so why do they really want to know our medical history? Why does the Government really want every one of our telephone calls recorded and emails and visited website URLs stored? Why has the Scottish Government really initiated the Children and Young People (Scotland) Bill which means that all Scottish children are given a “named person” as a sort of State guardian and information can be shared?

I have to shake my head at these privacy laws (the ones designed for us, not them). I have to abide by privacy legislation as a retailer and am obliged to have a company policy on it.

Obsession with privacy has become so ridiculous that people who work for the government are scared to tell you anything.

For example, until recently, a friend used to go to the same church as I used to, where half of the members work for the NHS. After the service, people congregate for up to three-quarters of an hour (or more) chatting over tea and biscuits (I’m sure that’s the main reason a fair proportion attend).

My friend asked a fellow church member, who is a physiotherapist, about how another church member was getting on. She replied that privacy laws meant that she wasn’t allowed to discuss the matter. A friendlier response, even if it had been a refusal to give details, might have been more appropriate.

Maybe we’ll have to start issuing freedom of information requests to our friends!

Even crazier was when the same friend went to the surgery so he could collect a patient friend to drive her home. He asked at reception if she was out of the doctor’s yet, to be told, “I’m not allowed to give you that information”.

Yet they want to know all about our lifestyles, so they can nanny us. A few years ago I decided to refuse to cooperate.

Maybe it’s not only to nanny us (shepherd us in the direction in which they want us to go). When you register at a new practice and they ask if you smoke and drink and if so, how much, maybe it’s to deny us treatment in the future, because it is clear that the money is not there to sustain the NHS, even in its current state of disrepair, for much longer.

Today, Frank Davis has a post about a department of the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, “If You Don’t Quit, We Won’t Operate?

Similar reports have been around for a few years now, yet in 1999, Gordon Brown as Chancellor of the Exchequer decided,

SMOKERS WILL start contributing directly to their own healthcare through an NHS tobacco tax….

Smokers are surely legally entitled to treatment or they have been defrauded?

As an aside, Breitbart took up the Scotsman’s story and added,

Despite the best endeavours of the anti smoking lobby, what is little known is that the only objective research done into the lifetime costs of treating smokers compared to other lifestyles was completed in 2008 by the Dutch Health Ministry.

The results calculated by actuaries found the lifetime cost from the age of twenty was the following:

Healthy: €281,000

Obese: €250,000

Smokers: €220,000

Yes, smokes (sic) are 22 percent cheaper to treat throughout their lifetime, mainly from premature mortality.

That’s not to mention the extra huge savings in pensions and care home costs for all the smokers who allegedly croak from a “smoking-related illness”.

But as is perfectly clear, the anti-smoking agenda has nothing to do with health, just as I am sure that the data-sharing schemes are not for our benefit.

Posted in Authoritarianism, Crime and Punishment, Gordon Brown, Health, NHS, Scotland, smoking, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Salmond vs Darling: the Debate on Scottish ‘Independence’

Two dangerous politicians and a Ponsonby at this week's debate

Two dangerous politicians and a Ponsonby at this week’s ‘independence’ debate on Scottish Television.

Subrosa alerted me to the STV debate the other day between these leaders of the ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ campaigns of the Scottish ‘Independence’ referendum which is taking place in six weeks’ time.

Approaching a decade since I bought a television licence, I couldn’t watch it live, but I managed to listen to it today online while working. I’m delighted I wasn’t sat in front of the telly for two hours, including adverts, because we didn’t learn much, if anything.

Subrosa reckons that, from the twenty minutes she watched, Alex Salmond’s performance was flat, while,

Alistair Darling appeared to be his usual self -  just managing to stay slightly above the ‘boring’ threshold.

I don’t know about that. The whole programme seemed designed to tell us next to nothing thanks to the chairman, Bernard Ponsonby’s, questioning, the audience’s participation and the two protagonists obsessed with the same narrow range of topics with both repeatedly refusing to answer simple questions.

I wouldn’t trust either of them to run a secondhand clothing stall at a jumble sale never mind a country.

I took notes, but very little was noteworthy. Alex Salmond said that if Scots voted for independence there would be the “certainty of democracy”. Considering that in his crusade to carpet Scotland with giant wind turbines, his regime has overruled local councils many times, reversing their decisions to deny more wind farms. And nearly two-thirds of respondents to his fake consultation on same-sex ‘marriage’ said, ‘No thanks’, but he’s decided it’s going ahead anyway. In fact the SNP had broadcast their intent before the consultation was even issued.

This is Alex Salmond’s idea of ‘democracy’.

One of Alistair Darling’s ‘concerns’ was about Scotland’s ageing population and our ability to pay a decent pension (he knows what that’s like having been the UK’s Chancellor of the Exchequer), but as Salmond said, a properly managed Scotland with more opportunities would persuade the 37,000 young Scots who leave annually to stay here. Encouraging Scots to have more children is required and it is well known that Salmond wants boatloads of immigrants arriving on our shores, so it needn’t be a permanent issue.

Not that I believe for a nanosecond that he and his comrades are anything like the sort of people we need to manage the country.

Apparently, Scotland has a larger proportion of pensioners than the rest of the UK, presumably because older English people sell their homes and buy something similar in a nice area up here for half the price and so release a large amount of money to help them enjoy their retirement.

I would have said that Salmond had the upper hand had it not been for a certain question asked by Darling over and over and also by some members of the audience – about Scotland’s currency should we be denied the use of the pound sterling.

Salmond insisted that he had Plans B, C, D and E, but no amount of pressure seemed to get answers to what these were. He blethered away continuously that the pound would be best for Scotland and the rest of the UK.

If you ask me, all he had to say was that most countries in the World, many much smaller than Scotland, have their own currencies. Next question, please!

His constant evasion was embarrassing and Darling was like a dog with the juiciest bone he had ever seen and couldn’t let go. In fact almost the entire time he had to question Salmond himself was devoted to what our currency would be. To no avail, but in wasting so much time when there are so many other questions that need answers to he made Salmond look totally clueless.

Salmond had his moment of firing the same unanswered question too, even comparing it to Paxman’s famous interrogation of Michael Howard. “Did you threaten to overrule him?

He continually asked Darling if he agreed with David Cameron that Scotland could be a successful independent country like other small European countries. He skated around the issue like Torvill and Dean. Politicians expect us to listen to them for two hours and cannot give a straight answer to a straightforward question.

They really do behave appallingly, yet they have great power over us, insisting that we behave and even think exactly according to their twisted worldview. They steal nearly half of our money in taxes and have already thieved a great many freedoms from us and they have the gall to whine away about ‘democracy’ all the time, as if a cross on a ballot paper is going to make a whit of difference, unless maybe a party like UKIP gets more votes than all the other parties combined.

At one point, Mr Ponsonby asks if the sovereignty of the people is a fiction.

Alistair Darling,

Of course I believe in the sovereignty of the people.

Says he who was a big part in the New Labour social re-engineering experiment, which meant almost ignoring completely the will and best interests of the people of the United Kingdom. According to Wikipedia,

Darling was one of only three people to have served in the Cabinet continuously from Labour’s victory in 1997 until its defeat in 2010 (the others being Gordon Brown and Jack Straw).

In his closing statement, Salmond had three points to make.

Number 1 was that the party we vote most for north of the border will always end up in government. At least half the time since he has been voting, he concluded, we did not end up with a government that Scots wanted (in other words, Tory governments).

Number 2 was that a prosperous economy would produce a just society. He didn’t explain how our windmill-powered future and (even more) extortionate prices for electricity would help facilitate this. Or what constitutes a ‘just society’.

Number 3 was that Scots will always be best at running Scotland.

Now that is pithy. Considering (like the Scottish Executive/Parliament) we are bound to have consecutive Labour and SNP governments running ruining Scotland. Salmond has proven himself to be somewhat of a dictator with a fixation for anything environmental and politically correct and Labour’s “Scottish Mafia” made a complete hash of trying to run the UK.

Which is a real shame because Scotland really is very well-endowed with mineral wealth, fisheries, forestry, agricultural land, financial services and large tourist numbers, but I’m afraid that with both Salmond and Darling pledging allegiance to Brussels and their parties and governments having a history of subverting and destroying their country and obliterating freedoms, neither an ‘independent’ Scotland run from Brussels/Geneva nor an EU/UN-controlled United Kingdom appeals to me.

What will I do with my vote?

Vote for the lesser of two evils? Sorry, but I wised up to that silly game years ago and anyway, I don’t know which qualifies for the title. I may not vote in this sham. It only encourages them.

I’ll leave the last words to Paul Simon and some lyrics from “Mrs Robinson”:

Sitting on a sofa on a Sunday afternoon.
Going to the candidates’ debate.
Laugh about it, shout about it,
When you’ve got to choose.
Every way you look at this you lose.

Posted in New Labour, Scotland, SNP, Trade and Industry | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

All Animals are Equal, but Some Animals are More Equal Than Others

Keep voting LibLabCon and it'll keep getting worse.

Keep voting LibLabCon and it’ll keep getting worse.

‘Twas always thus, of course, but in this age of “equality” you would think everything would have become almost ironed out by now so that we were all just about truly equal and bells of joy would be ringing out around the Western World, which has been tweaked over many decades to the point of near-perfection so that our society has reached a previously unheard of peak of compassion, tolerance and understanding.

We should be seeing homosexual Jews skipping down the road, hand-in-hand with bearded Muslim clerics, both grinning from ear to ear, such is the ecstasy experienced just by living in an all-inclusive, multicultural society where every ‘stakeholder’ is equally valued.

Marxist-Leninist trades union leaders should be addressing the Bullingdon Club boys to cheers of appreciation at experiencing the joys of diversity of opinion. You would expect the compassion, love, mutual understanding and respect to be oozing out of every pore.

You get my point.

It’s not quite like that in reality, is it? I remember how things were when this equality industry was still in first gear. Few people cared about someone else’s colour or religion. Sexuality was a private matter. We were shown some National Front skinheads on telly and a few murders of black children were made ‘high profile’ to make us think that society at large had a racist around every corner. Like today, you would think there was a paedophile living in every third house.

Mothers were there for us after school. There were no after-school clubs or pre-school nurseries. Grandparents, neighbours and older siblings looked after each others’ sprogs if need be until the women who chose to work got back home.

This was the 1970s. In the early 1990s I was working in an insurance office in London’s Oxford Street. There were tons of our Commonwealth Cousins, plus an American, a Frenchwoman and an Algerian to name some I remember. Still, there was no ‘racism’, ‘sexism’ (two of the three bosses were women), ‘religious intolerance’ (my best friend was a Muslim, probably because we both liked to spend an hour or five in pubs). Sexuality wasn’t mentioned. Nobody seemed to care what anyone else was. We were equal. Apart from the salaries, obviously.

But like the depiction on the Fabian Society’s stained glass window I showed two posts back, the God-given, natural order on Earth had to be smashed to smithereens so that it could be rebuilt to suit the aims of the Marxists.

The faux liberté, égalité, fraternité which has gradually built up over a long time has had a devastating effect on society.

The liberty part: when we are forced to be equal then freedom must go. It is unavoidable. Anyway, I conclusively demonstrated in 2010 that we have no rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

As for equality: we don’t actually have it. I was driven to write this post after reading the latest from Frank Davis, who reported that the World’s top PR companies have ruled out working with manmade climate change ‘deniers’.

Some of the world’s top PR companies have for the first time publicly ruled out working with climate change deniers, marking a fundamental shift in the multi-billion dollar industry that has grown up around the issue of global warming.

Public relations firms have played a critical role over the years in framing the debate on climate change and its solutions – as well as the extensive disinformation campaigns launched to block those initiatives.

Now a number of the top 25 global PR firms have told the Guardian they will not represent clients who deny man-made climate change, or take campaigns seeking to block regulations limiting carbon pollution.

How come these PR companies are brazenly turning down business from people who don’t agree with their beliefs, but Christian bakers on both sides of the Pond have been ordered to bake ‘wedding’ cakes for two people of the same gender contrary to their beliefs?

It’s a rhetorical question, of course. If you stick with the script, you can mostly do what you wish.

If you stand up for traditional family values, you’re an out-of-touch, homophobic, transphobic caveman who probably believes in the Sky Pixie. (The fact that the brainwashed always use the same phrases is proof that they have indeed been under mass mind control. I know this from many conversations with Dawkins’ disciples on his blog before I was banned.)

Yet Stonewall reps are allowed to directly influence schoolchildren with visits and the ‘material’ they send out, like these “teacher training packs,” which encourage teachers to talk to children as young as five about homosexual relationships and that boys should be allowed to express their feminine side by wearing dresses. They were given a £25,000 Government grant to help fund it.

And where does ‘positive discrimination’ fit into equality? All-women lists for selecting a political candidate being perhaps the most well-known example.

In fact, it may soon be illegal to criticise feminism.

It is not impossible that the future will be run mainly by women (I guess that was one of the aims of ‘family planning’). The EU is now planning to make it illegal to be intolerant of feminist views. A EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK NATIONAL STATUTE FOR THE PROMOTION OF TOLERANCE (Pdf) lists “anti-feminism” along with the usual areas of ‘discrimination’.

They are trying to force us men and the majority of women who oppose feminism to agree that a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle. According to a Netmums poll, “Only 1 in 7 women still call themselves a ‘Feminist’ – with younger women least likely to”.

If those in the EU get their way:

The purpose of this Statute is to….

(c) Eliminate hate crimes as defined in Section 1(c)
(d) Condemn all manifestations of intolerance based on bias, bigotry and prejudice.
(e) Take concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia.

(My emphasis.)

But a totalitarian clique declaring that totalitarian ideologies must be eliminated sounds good, but they won’t exterminate themselves.

Then it gives certain ‘guarantees’ like freedom of expression and religious freedom, but we’ve seen already how this is a lie. The very idea is to prevent even any bias. If this proposed statute is successful, the goalposts will be moved from ‘prejudice’ and ‘discrimination’ to mere ‘bias’. We must accept feminists treating us men and the vast majority of their non-compliant sisters as second class citizens or we get done for being biased.

Common Purpose will snap up the militant feministas. The less actual ability they have for their jobs the better as it will make for an even more clunking system that doesn’t work and people don’t get their pensions in winter because of ‘clerical errors’ and operations are botched or they fail to wake up from their anesthetic – the gas chambers of the future? Hitler started by gassing tens of thousands of mentally ill people in hospitals.

That’s another way to get rid of people who are a ‘problem’ in a police state, especially when Agenda 21 is properly up and running. You can go Soviet-style and have them diagnosed with mental illness and lock them away indefinitely. You could download child porn or a detailed terrorist plan to their hard drive and lock them up and completely destroy their reputation, or you could have some phony doctors (borrow some from ATOS) deliberately diagnose a disease that needs an operation and you’re on the sleeper to Auschwitz.

It’ll be like the Two Ronnies’ “The Worm That Turned” from 1980. From Wikipedia:

Diana Dors guest-starred in this spoof piece of dystopian fiction set in 2012 in which women rule England. Male and female gender roles are completely reversed, even down to men having women’s names and vice-versa. Men are housekeepers and wear women’s clothes, and law and order is managed by female guards in boots and hot pants.

Like Orwell, they just got the date wrong. And probably the hot pants. They’ll force us blokes to wear them to prove we’re not ‘biased’.

We don’t even need the EU’s ‘help’ – This member of the Labour Party has blogged:

Ever since I re-joined Labour after the 2010 election, the party’s approach to gender politics has concerned me. For a start Labour generally uses the word ‘equality’ in an Orwellian sense, not to describe equality but rather with securing exclusive, preferred rights for women, while giving free reign to some pretty aggressive anti-male rhetoric. But the culture of barely allowing any criticism or critique of this approach is if anything more disturbing, reflecting the authoritarian instincts of many of these activists and a weakness of values in the party.

Another thing I’ve been finding out over the years is that practically all the systems in place supposedly to help and protect us proles are often just a mirage. For example, the NHS (last year refused to treat me; legal action pending); the Citizens Advice Bureau (wrote one letter and received a whole load of lies back and refused to send even a second letter); the benefits system (many years ago I was denied income support for nearly two years, despite submitting sick notes, and had to take out a loan of £11,000 to pay off credit cards to get through it; I contacted several charities, none of which could or would help; judging by my dealings with the TPS (Telephone Preference Service), they clearly don’t want to catch the same few nuisance companies who have been at it for years.

As usual I’m going off on tangents, but it’s obviously important for totalitarian regimes to keep the people under the impression that they are cared about. False hope, like the lottery.

Nearly forgot about fraternity. Brotherhood was the last thing on their minds when they devised their demonic plans to remould the planet. Just the opposite: divide and conquer.

Never again will you be capable of ordinary human feeling. Everything will be dead inside you. Never again will you be capable of love, or friendship, or joy of living, or laughter, or curiosity, or courage, or integrity. You will be hollow. We shall squeeze you empty and then we shall fill you with ourselves. (‘1984′)

And more and more people seem to be buying into it all, despite the evidence to the contrary gained from personal experience and what they have seen happening to some of their friends and family let down by the judicial/health/welfare/education system and they still believe that the State is their surrogate parent.

Posted in Authoritarianism, Climate Change, Common Purpose, EU, United Nations | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Forvik Invaded. Giant Scottish Flag Appears on Cliff.

Where? You’re probably asking. Forvik is a tiny island in the Shetlands which the owner, Stuart Hill, has declared to be a sovereign state based on the evidence that the Shetlands were never legally part of Scotland and hence the UK.

I believe that Westminster and Edinburgh governments have ignored his correspondence, but the local council admits that he may be onto something. He wants independence for all the Shetland Islands.

He left the island recently and when he returned, a giant saltire had been draped over a cliff. Being in the trade, I can tell you that getting a flag made that size would have cost a fortune, although on closer inspection it looks like a homemade job perhaps using plastic sheeting.

Scottish flag on Forvik, Shetland IslandsScotland flag on Forvik, Shetland IslandsMr Hill also received a “purported Scottish government letter”:

Forvik letter
Who knows if this was an act purely by cranks (local or otherwise) or if there was any official involvement?

What is for sure is that there seems to be a genuine case for Shetland independence as it appears it may never have been part of Scotland and Mr Hill is obviously a thorn in the Establishment’s side.

In 1469 King Christian I of Denmark/Norway pawned the Shetlands to James III of Scotland to raise money for his daughter’s dowry and if Mr Hill is correct that, as Wikipedia puts it, as the loan was never repaid and no other legal agreement ever put in place, Shetland remains in a constitutional limbo.

With all that oil, the 23,000 Islanders would have much to gain if the constitutional truth is that the Shetlands never were part of Scotland to begin with.

That would be a real spanner in the works of the ‘Yes’ camp’s financial calculations.

We have already seen what Salmond’s limited junta is capable of doing. Down here in Galloway, they overrule our councillors who say, “No more wind farms” but are routinely ignored and are thus further endangering our tourist industry with even more of these monstrosities.

They have allowed a UN land grab down here in the form of a UNESCO biosphere, which covers one fifteenth of Scotland. This is the ‘first’ of such biospheres. Another two of the same size would result in the UN dictating the rules in a fifth of Scotland.

And the EU will make most of the rest of the rules, so they should have planted the EU flag on Forvik. All that this indepretendence would achieve is direct rule from Brussels.

The joke ‘consultation’ on same-sex ‘marriage’ resulted in it being rejected by almost two-thirds of respondents, but the cultural subverters posing as patriots had already decided it was going to be policy. Former KGB subverter, Yuri Bezmenov, admitted that they would spread ‘equality’ in the West so that we build our society on sand for it to collapse to be taken over.

Fabian socialism works along similar lines and has been adopted by all the mainstream UK parties, except UKIP (and they’ve bought into some of it).

I reckon that these so-called Scottish patriots in Edinburgh are the most PC-obsessed, EU-loving, green-god-worshipping politicians in Europe and hence the most anti-Scottish of people and have no right to even look on the saltire without thinking of their treason. But most of them are too stupid to work it all out. Salmond knows the Game Plan, of course. Was there ever a wolf in sheep’s clothing of his ilk since Judas Iscariot?

Even the colour of the St Andrew’s Cross has been changed by a previous ‘government’ or ‘executive’ from a proper blue (of no official shade) to this horrible, almost-turquoise blue. I expect it will slowly turn green to reflect the SNP’s worship of the environment.

I was thinking of not voting in the referendum because either way, we’ll be ruled from Brussels, but this has inclined me to vote ‘No’. Imagine what an unfettered SNP Government could be capable of.

I don’t know why thousands of people aren’t doing what Stuart Hill is doing because we have absolutely no political representation in any parliament. We are dictated to; spoken at; forced to comply with every jot and tittle of bilge that comes via Edinburgh, Westminster, Brussels and Geneva.

The UK Government has held several referenda in Gibraltar to ensure that the 30,000 residents have self-determination. I remember self-determination being said repeatedly on television during the 1982 Falklands War, for the then 2,000 Islanders to decide where their destiny lay and the UK was quick to recognise Kosovo as a sovereign state, despite it being an integral part of Serbia.

As usual, different ‘standards’ depending on circumstances. Naturally, self-determination for the Shetland Islanders will be one of the very last things Edinburgh will want.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why the ‘Nanny State’ Had to Turn Nasty

Today’s post from Frank Davis is about how the “nanny state” is a misnomer; it should be the “bully state” and…

If anything it’s really a technological, eugenicist state, engaged in a vast social engineering project. The goal is to create an ideal human type, that is smoke-free, alcohol-free, slim, fit, vegetarian, sustainable, low-carbon, environmentally-friendly, etc. This will be ‘progress’. And that means denormalising and demonising and excluding smokers and drinkers and tubbies and meat-eaters and anyone else who’s non-ideal in any way whatsoever.

It’s essentially a new variant of Nazism. It’s just (at the moment, anyway) a soft Nazism without selections and gas chambers, that uses rules and regulations and media campaigns to cajole and bully and shame everyone into conformity. But it could at any moment metamorphose into fully-fledged, genocidal Nazism because it’s underlying logic is essentially genocidal: it’s trying, after all, to get rid of undesirable traits. And when cajoling and bullying don’t work, mass murder will be the only remaining option.

It’s also a soft Nazism because it’s not overtly racist or homophobic. But this is just a temporary historical expedient, and when its true genocidal character finally emerges, gays and lesbians and Jews and blacks won’t be spared either.

Very recently it hit me that our whole (Western) society has been recreated by eugenicists. They’re not Nazis as such, but socialists/communists, which some would argue are one and the same with a few tweaks.

It’s why the ‘master race’ idea has resurfaced, as Frank graphically phrased it, like a blind and bloated corpse ascending from the depths of a lake, its distended right arm raised in rigid salute.

But he never really died. He was like Dracula, asleep in his coffin by day and working undercover at night, out of sight, biting every governmental, academic, voluntary and religious institution in the neck, in the guise of the likes of the Fabian Society,

Named after Roman general Fabius Maximus (nicknamed “Cunctator”, meaning “the Delayer”). His Fabian strategy advocated tactics of harassment and attrition rather than head-on battles against the Carthaginian army under the renowned general Hannibal.

The Fabian Society stained glass window

The Fabian Society stained glass window, now displayed at the Fabian-founded LSE.

The Fabian window, designed by early member George Bernard Shaw, shows their recently defunct (I believe) symbol of a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Either side, you have co-founder Sidney Webb and G.B. Shaw hammering away at the earth as an anvil, shattering it, to rebuild it in their image.

The window had been stolen and when found, was donated to the London School of Economics (which was founded by four Fabian members) where Tony Blair, then PM (and a Fabian)

Spoke about the remarkable way the Fabians influenced the Labour party, not just in its creation but also in its economic, political and intellectual development. ‘Despite all the very obvious differences in policy and attitude and positioning… a lot of the values that the Fabians and George Bernard Shaw stood for would be very recognisable, at least I hope they would, in today’s Labour party.”

The early ‘pioneers’ of ‘soft’ eugenics include Margaret Sanger of Planned Parenthood (who privately wanted blacks exterminated through sterilisation). The abortion mills of America are now killing as many blacks every three days as the Ku Klux Klan lynched in all of its history.

Over here, the demented Marie Stopes called for sterilisation of ‘undesirable’ types while sending adoring poetry to Hitler. Now we have ‘clinics’ named after this lunatic who cut out her son from her will because he married a short-sighted woman. Their MD is a government advisor on teenage pregnancy strategy, as is a director of the other famous abortion ‘provider’ BPAS (British Pregnancy Advisory Service). That’s why they keep advising lower ages for sex ‘education’ (we have seen how past efforts in sex education have increased their number of customers) and Fabian Ed Balls has been championing sex ed for five year olds. Now some sick people/subverters billed as being ‘experts’ are targeting nurseries.

Because the Fabians knew that to destroy the family was the only way that total socialism could be achieved, creating sexual confusion and separating love from sex seems to be an effective way of creating dysfunction and has prevented a lot of people from the last generation or two settle down to normal family life.

And the proles bought ‘family planning’ hook, line and sinker. But while they thought they were doing the planning to have a better life (one or two children and more money to spend on a better house/car/TV) it was the socialist elites doing the planning to destroy the family and reduce the population.

Then came feminism and ‘a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle’ and the rest of the sexual ‘liberation’ of the 60s, which was actually consigning future generations to loneliness, single families, disease and regrets from playing around and general struggle and strife.

Another consequence has been the need for millions more houses for all the singletons, hence house prices have been going through the roof. Combined with draconian planning legislation, we have been consigned to living cheek-by-jowl in tiny houses. The old tenement flats in Glasgow are huge compared to some of the more modern offerings. Frank adds,

And what’s truly shocking (for me) about this new Nazism is that its ideology seems to have permeated the whole of British society (and more or less every other society as well) without anyone really noticing.

This was the Fabian trick. Their other logo was the tortoise as they knew they would have to move imperceptibly slowly so that people wouldn’t catch on to these wolves in sheep’s clothing.

Why religions have to go and we cannot be allowed to follow our conscience is, as another Fabian H.G. Wells put it, that the old religions of the world must give way to the new religion of collectivism. The new religion should be the state and the state should take charge of all human activity.

Finally, I knew the name of Ezra Taft Benson from my Mormon days (he was a former President/’Prophet’) but before that, he had been Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Secretary of Agriculture and said:

I have talked face to face with the godless communist leaders. It may surprise you to learn that I was host to Mr. Kruschev for a half day when he visited the United States, not that I’m proud of it. I opposed his coming then, and I still feel it was a mistake to welcome this atheistic murderer as a state visitor. But, according to President Eisenhower, Kruschev had expressed a desire to learn something of American Agriculture — and after seeing Russian agriculture I can understand why. As we talked face to face, he indicated that my grandchildren would live under communism. After assuring him that I expected to do all in my power to assure that his and all other grandchildren will live under freedom he arrogantly declared in substance:

“You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism. We won’t have to fight you. We’ll so weaken your economy until you’ll fall like overripe fruit into our hands.

And just about on time, as predicted, Obama comes along.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Political Correctness Was ‘Invented In Nazi Germany’ and How They Made the Most out of Socialised ‘Healthcare’


Increasingly fewer manners.

This is a bit of a ramble through some of the important beliefs it is important to our ‘masters’ that we swallow and where those ideas came from and the damage they can and are doing.

Ever wonder why our freedoms are disappearing at an alarming rate? It is because the EU is based on Hitler’s ideas for the Continent after his hordes won the War.

Frank Davis has discovered that political correctness seems to have begun life in Nazi Germany after listening to an interview of Christopher Monckton by James Delingpole and taking the trouble of transcribing this part.

It’s a dangerous time. I’ve been looking quite closely at the pre-Nazi period in Germany. I have a lot of papers to do with it which aren’t public, because my grandfather was minister of information during the early years of the war… And so he had a lot of papers on this, and was very interested in how the Nazis had managed to get control. And they had followed a pattern that is discernible in their documents. The first thing they did was to go round saying there was only one acceptable point of view. That was where Political Correctness really first was invented, as you were not allowed to have a point of view other than that of the Nazi Party. Even though they were hardly represented in the Reichstag at all, they were beginning to shout down anyone who disagreed with them, and they would attack the individuals rather than their arguments…. The next stage was they began openly demanding that those who disagreed with them should be arrested, put on trial (or not put on trial, they didn’t much care) and then either imprisoned or executed… for disagreeing with the Nazi party on almost anything.

I saw a note the other day from somebody who’d listed half a dozen instances of what I call the Climate Communists saying that people like us should be arrested, imprisoned, tried and executed for crimes against the planet, or treason against the planet, or high crimes against humanity. There are various formulations from Jim Hansen upwards… Practically every week somebody is now saying this. And I thought I would just see if we bullied the bullies back, what would happen… The third stage was that they took office, and then they began going round and arresting people and executing them because they took a different view. So I don’t like the fact that we’ve got to stages 1 and 2. And one of the interesting things about pre-Nazi Germany was that because of the savage personal attacks which were directed by the Nazis at anyone who disagreed with them, it eventually got to the point where very few people who disagreed with them would dare to say so. And so it was left to only a tiny handful who dared to put their heads above the parapet.

I was talking to a US Congressman the other day, and I said, “Why, since you don’t believe a word of this global warming stuff, why don’t more of your colleagues do what you very occasionally do, and come out and say this is rubbish?” He said, “We’ve all seen what’s happened to your reputation because you dared to speak out… … We’ve watched this happening, and we don’t want it happening to us. That’s why we don’t speak out more often.” That is exactly how it was in Nazi Germany, and I have all the papers on it… And you could see this hate-speech going on all the time against anyone who dared to disagree, and eventually it worked: people just became frightened to say anything. Now that is happening in our legislature to quite a large degree now. People want to get re-elected, and they know that if they come out too openly against the usual suspects, then the Greens will target them – perhaps even at national level – and make it impossible for them to be re-elected… If you broadcast, they’ll try to take your advertising revenue away… This constant attack against the individual doesn’t so much hurt the individual, what it does do is frighten off anybody else from doing the same, and this comes over and over again in the pre-war papers of what was going on in Nazi Germany.

As Frank adds, No mention of the Nazi antismoking parallels.

That’s yet another similarity: the paranoia of ex-smoker Adolf and our ASH-obsessed politicians.

Which brings me onto why socialised healthcare is so important for dictatorships. They can achieve all manner of control and ideological subversion this way.

Although Bismarck had inaugurated an NHS-lite in the 1880s for certain people but only because he supposedly believed that a light version of socialism would stave off full-blown Marxism, it was during the Weimar Republic (at which time, of course, the USSR had socialised everything) when further major advances were made to German socialised healthcare and the popularity of social Darwinism had also grown, so by the time Hitler came along, he could implement, for example, the Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring which enabled a “Genetic Health Court” to order the sterilisation of anybody considered to suffer from a supposed genetic disorder (many of which weren’t genetic).

He did this within months of becoming Führer.

The Holocaust Encyclopedia states,

Public health measures to control reproduction and marriage aimed at strengthening the “national body” by eliminating biologically threatening genes from the population. Many German physicians and scientists who had supported racial hygiene ideas before 1933 embraced the new regime’s emphasis on biology and heredity, the new career opportunities, and the additional funding for research.

Isn’t it just the same today? They opened up “research” facilities and funded “experts” to try to legitimise what they wanted to do all along. Nowadays we have all the funding going to support just one point of view: that the climate is changing due to humans; that secondhand smoke causes numerous deaths; that the Theory of Evolution is true by producing the most ridiculous of human ‘missing links’ which are even less convincing than Piltdown Man.

As you know, I’m big on the Creationism vs evolution theory debate, so when a lemur called “Ida” was introduced to the world five years ago as the missing link between apes and humans by then New York Mayor, Michael Bloomberg (who is probably far more of an anti-smoking zealot than Hitler was), the sound of the accompanying enormous global media fanfare made sure everyone ‘knew’ that we were descended from the animals. Sky News said,

The search for a direct connection between humans and the rest of the animal kingdom has taken 200 years – but it was presented to the world today at a special news conference in New York.

They have admitted that all the previous ones were fakes.

With her human-like nails instead of claws, and opposable big toes, she is placed at the very root of human evolution when early primates first developed features that would eventually develop into our own.

Yet her offspring had to walk upright. With opposable toes? Maybe thumbs would have been more convincing, chaps.

Anyway, less than a year later, the fuss had died down about this Holy Grail and lost ark of archaeology (see how evolutionists want it to be a religion?), when it was discovered that Ida was not a human ancestor; not a ‘missing link’.

So we are left with no credible evidence of a link between humans and ape-like ancestors if Ida was the first groundbreaking example. Yes, the Theory of Evolution is rammed down our throats as much as the Carbon Con and the need for a European superstate and socialised healthcare and fake ‘human rights’ and so on. All for control. As Lenin stated,

Our programme necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism.

Back on the subject of socialised ‘healthcare’ under the Third Reich and a few years after the ‘Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring’, Action T4 (Aktion T4) came into being where perhaps 200,000 people were euthanised (murdered) in mental hospitals from 1939.

Medical concerns which had largely been in the private domain in the nineteenth century increasingly became a concern of the state. The physician began to be transformed into a functionary of state-initiated laws and policies. Doctors slowly began to see themselves as more responsible for the public health of the nation than for the individual health of the patient. It is one thing to see oneself as responsible for the “nation’s health” and quite another to be responsible for an individual patient’s health. It is one thing to be employed by an individual, another to be employed by the government.

As I have said before, the NHS now exists primarily to control, subvert, keep the Pharma transnationals making healthy profits, collect data for the government and of course, kill.

In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote:

He who is bodily and mentally not sound and deserving may not perpetuate this misfortune in the bodies of his children. The völkische [people's] state has to perform the most gigantic rearing-task here. One day, however, it will appear as a deed greater than the most victorious wars of our present bourgeois era.

It was around this time that some of the (other) characters who have shaped the modern Western world were active, like Marie Stopes, who doted on Hitler and concentrated her ‘clinics’ among poor people and her counterpart in the USA, Margaret Sanger, was prominent and wanted to sterilise the blacks into extinction. Stopes wanted to sterilise the diseased, drunkards and people of ‘bad character’. Probably blacks, Jews, gypsies, etc. as well, but not sure if that’s on record.

Social Darwinism thrived after the apparent defeat of the Third Reich. You could argue that Aktion T4 is alive in the UK with unborn babies with disabilities allowed to be aborted (murdered) up until the moment before birth and where the Liverpool ‘Care’ Pathway starved and dehydrated people to death.

Like Aktion T4, the LCP was painted as a caring way of dealing with people, but is leading to increasing numbers being killed off one way or another, with hospitals receiving extra money for people dying this way. There are even the good old ‘targets’ to aim for. Targets are another way to ensure control and compliance.

Interestingly, T4 used starvation as one of the killing methods, along with lethal injections and gas chambers.

Eugenics is very much on the agenda. The first UNESCO Director-general was Julian Huxley, the famous internationalist and eugenicist.

The WHO’s first D-G was also a eugenicist called Brock Chisholm, whom Frank Davis wrote about a few months ago.

This notion that nation-states are the cause of war is now a modern orthodoxy, routinely trotted out as a justification for the EU into which European states are to be dissolved, after being ‘bought through guile’, and bound by treaties of cooperation such as the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Chisholm was also an advocate of world government, saying:

“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.”

There has even been a eugenicist conference at the Scottish Parliament.

One of the patrons of the Optimum Population Trust (now Population Matters) calling for depopulation is David Attenborough. That Sky report says,

Sir David Attenborough said Darwin “would have been thrilled” to have seen the fossil – and says it tells us who we are and where we came from.

“This little creature is going to show us our connection with the rest of the mammals,” he said.

“This is the one that connects us directly with them.

“Now people can say ‘okay we are primates, show us the link’.

“The link they would have said up to now is missing – well it’s no longer missing.”

And people trust these individuals with their ‘superior knowledge’, delivered with posh authoritativeness, that the population of the UK should be reduced to 30 million by midway through the next century.

This headline may be slightly misleading, but the Führer made the most out of it and showed how dangerous it can be in the wrong hands: The Real Father of Universal Healthcare – Adolf Hitler,

The first mass murders of the Holocaust were carried out in the socialized German hospitals and the techniques for governmental mass murder were developed and refined there. Several hundred thousand handicapped and mentally ill persons were murdered in Hitler’s universal healthcare system. Retarded and mentally ill children were euthanized and the T4 project did the same for handicapped, mentally ill and elderly adults. In his order permitting medical killing, Hitler called them “mercy killing” and “lives not worth living.” In this way Germany produced great savings in healthcare, not only due to the extermination of existing patients, but many ill persons and their families became too fearful, due to rumors of the killings, to dare check into the hospitals.

I believe this is one of the reasons for blanket smoking bans in an increasing number of hospitals these days. It will deter smokers from seeking treatment. For example, I reckon that over 90% of the many, many people I shared communal areas with in the alcohol detox centre in 1998 were smokers. I noticed a few weeks ago on Google maps a sign at the entrance that the hospital is now completely no-smoking. I cannot imagine how some of those poor folk getting treatment for one addiction which some find totally impossible to be free from could cope for the hours they must be spend there without a cigarette. Many will inevitably not seek help. ‘Natural selection’ will kill them off when, for example their livers pack up or they walk in front of a vehicle.

One of the issues for the German pioneers was the cost of universal healthcare. When the UK welfare state was being set up, it was admitted that it could only be afforded if there was full employment and industrial output. We are very far away from that now, while the scope of welfare has expanded far beyond the horizon of its founders. The NHS cannot treat everyone, so patients seem to be getting thinned out one way and another.

My 92 year-old grandmother was repeatedly sent home from the doctor’s surgery and A&E. The blood clot which left her in agony was ‘all in her mind’ and she died a few weeks later after many visits seeking help. She had been incredibly fit and not a hypochondriac in the slightest. Maybe it was a genuine mistake. What do you think?

But the local paper wouldn’t print the story as almost the exact same thing had happened a few months earlier, which they did print.

Another example being the plumber from Hertforshire who was denied urgent treatment to fix his badly fractured arm until he gave up smoking. They can save money and/or micromanage people’s lives in unbelievable ways.

But how many times have we heard Hitler’s reasons of “mercy killing” and “lives not worth living” as excuses for aborting unborn babies suspected of being disabled?

It’s now being used to promote euthanasia for the old and sick.

Who’ll be next? The mentally ill, like under T4?

Posted in Authoritarianism, Creationism, eugenics, Scotland, SNP, Social Engineering | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

DRIP and Tricks of the Political Trade

The real reason for the drastic Government reshuffle, according to many commentators, is to deflect our attention from the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers (DRIP) Bill which has been rushed through the Commons after the European Court of Justice decided the current measures were ‘illegal’. But according to The Freedom Association:

With the Snoopers’ Charter already having been widely rejected by the public and parliamentarians – the DRIP Bill looks far too similar. While the Home Secretary has claimed this is “merely status quo” legislation – a short glance at it clearly shows that it will grant the security services and police carte blanche access to the emails, telephone calls, texts and internet usage of all UK citizens at home and abroad.

Hat-tip to Leg-iron, who writes,

It’s how stage magic works. While you watch the fancy moves of the left hand, you don’t notice the casual slip of the right hand into a pocket.

It’s like that lesser-used trick made famous by Labour ‘spin doctor’ Jo Moore, “A good day to bury bad news” while thousands had just been killed on 9/11.

Miss Moore’s memo, written at 2.55pm on September 11, when millions of people were transfixed by the terrible television images of the terrorist attack, said: “It is now a very good day to get out anything we want to bury. Councillors expenses?

The first shock is that she’s not a ‘Ms’. The second shock is that such a callous, heartless female was not put on one of those all-women MP shortlists.

But – and this is my point – the U.S. security services were passed intelligence from various governments’ security services about an imminent attack pre-9/11 and ignored them (I wonder why!).

Secondly, if it’s the paedophilia they’re concerned about re. the need for data retention – it seems endemic in Westminster, the judiciary and the upper echelons of the police and is well known about (among themselves and by MI5), but gets covered up.

No. The data retention is for us. If not for now, for the future. Not for terrorists or paedos, but to intercept anti-government talk and catch manmade climate change ‘deniers’, etc. and probably for other reasons, like sifting ‘chatter’ for evidence of tax evasion and benefit fraud.

Re. Jo Moore’s comment in 2001:

But around Westminster, where there was shock and distaste at her cynicism, it was thought that she would have to go.

Sure. You can imagine the ‘shock’ among the heartless and the brain dead in Westminster, can’t you? I can picture them laughing their heads off while they down another subsidised G&T.

The Rev David Smith, whose cousin died in the attack, told the BBC that Miss Moore’s attempt to exploit the tragedy represented the very worst in modern politics.

Now that IS funny. Considering New Labour had recently won their second general election and routinely dumped on us all for years.

But the thought occurs that all this paedomania has been engineered, not only as a sleight of hand to distract us from what the right hand is doing (or the other left hand), but to bring in more surveillance. It could be why, decades later, hundreds of women (and a few blokes) have appeared as if by magic to accuse all manner of people – the living who have mainly managed to defend themselves and been found ‘not guilty’ and the dead Jimmy Savile, where the claims of his alleged abuses are being systematically exposed as fabrications by Anna Raccoon as Savile routinely seems not to have been at the hospitals at the periods in question or he was not left unaccompanied at all when the ‘victims’ were subjected to his hand up their blouse, etc.

So what we need is more surveillance. More intrusion. Scotland’s “Named Person” police state nannyism.

Another famous trick that the best illusionists can do is to make an elephant disappear. That’s why so many people fail to see the elephant in the room.

Or rather, the herd of elephants…

Posted in Crime and Punishment, Paedophilia, Tory-Lib Coalition | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment