I object to my taxes being used to call me a ‘retarded homophobe’
These days, it seems to me that a lot of the biggest and most influential registered charities have a greater interest in promoting our masters’ social engineering agenda than anything else.
I don’t honestly know if the British Association for Adoption and Fostering (BAAF) does a good or bad job overall, but according to the Daily Mail, “the bulk of its £6million-a-year budget comes from the taxpayer.”
Most of us are now 'retarded homophobes' according to this booklet we helped pay for.
It is disgusting, then, that they should publish a booklet in which a homosexual adopter slanders those critical of homosexuals adopting by calling them “retarded homophobes”.
Of course, I realise that the whole ‘gay’ agenda was set up to devalue normal family life and as one of many divide and rule devices, but it is particularly sickening when children are used as the pawns and anyone who objects is now called a retarded homophobe and the message is printed and distributed out of their own taxes to boot!
The BAAF has since ‘apologised’ over the ‘human error’, but I am certainly left wondering how the person who used the phrase “retarded homophobes” is bringing up his or her adopted child(ren).
I don’t think it is being unfair to say that children are not trophies, they are people, and if you don’t want to get married in order to provide a caring, stable home for them, don’t demand the ‘right’ to adopt or receive fertility treatment.
Hey, this is crap. I am gay and have been active in gay causes since 1982.
I agree that “children are not trophies, they are people”. And frankly, perhaps because I am a mummies boy, I can see the advantage of having a mum. And my stepfather has been a great “Dad” to me.
But life is both *variable* and *imperfect*. I am not prepared to agree that having a married Mum and Dad who love each other and bring you up is the only perfect situation, although I admit it has its attractions.
In real life though, having any responsible adult couple who love and cherish you is more than many people get. And I would argue that a lesbian or gay couple who were responsible, loved you, etc., are better than even your own biological mother and father if they maltreat you.
You are not a homophobe if you have a certain ideal; you are a homophobe if you thing that in the real, hard to deal with, world, a Lesbian or Gay couple cannot be the best actually possible parents.
Paul, I think it has been adequately demonstrated that married couples offer the most stable environment for children.
You are considering what is best for children?
I am curious. I wonder what instincts attract homosexuals to want children, but not do what nature demands in order to have them.
Just a thought!
Your taxes being used to call you a retarded homophobe? Welcome to modern Britain.
And be grateful. Your taxes could, and probably will, be used to do a lot worse to you.
Indeed, Mr. Brown. Our taxes fund an enormous range of heinous projects. I expect I will cover many of them on this blog in the coming months. I can’t help myself!
I’ve been a tax payer for nearly thirty years and I’m perfectly happy for my taxes to be used to call You a homophobe