The schoolboy in a dress
The Mail reports on a Sun article,
A 12-year-old boy is preparing to have a sex change operation after returning to school following the summer break as a girl, it was claimed today.
The boy, who has now had his name changed to a girl’s by deed poll, apparently arrived at school in a dress and pigtails.
Okay…
Stunned teachers called an emergency assembly to explain the sex change to confused pupils who have been told they must now treat the child as a girl.
‘We are committed to ensuring the best for our child. We are working with other agencies to ensure our child’s welfare is protected,’ his mother told the Sun.
The ‘best’ for your son would be competent psychiatrists and psychologists, not pigtails and a girl’s name. And the father – where is he?
But other parents are reported to have reacted angrily and said the head teacher should have warned them before the school’s announcement to their children.
Ask the parents? In Soviet Britain?
‘They behaved appallingly by throwing this hand grenade into the room and then leaving the inevitable questions about it for unprepared parents,’one mother said.
‘Maybe we could have explained sexual politics and encouraged our kids to be more sensitive if we’d had a chance to be involved.’
‘Sexual politics’?
Another added: ‘This girl, as she now is, has been through hell because of how this has been handled.’
They claimed the decision not to inform them in advance could open up the child to bullying and taunts because other children do not understand.
The boy, who is said to have repeatedly told his friends he wants to be a girl, could become the world’s youngest sex change patient.
After taking the decision to return to school as a girl, he is now apparently preparing for hormone treatment and ultimately surgery.
And the psychiatrist, where is he?
It had been hoped the transformation might go unnoticed because the initial sex swap was done as the child moved from primary to secondary school.
But former classmates realised and spread the news, prompting taunts from other pupils who asked: ‘Are you gay?’
The ultimate crime.
Teachers decided to step in and warn them of disciplinary action if they did not treat him as a girl.
During the special assembly, some confused pupils are reported to have burst into tears. The sex swap child was not there and has not been at school since the announcement was made.
His family have also allegedly been threatened and are now under police protection.
The school insist their child will return to school but not while there is any risk to her safety.
His safety. Wearing a dress doesn’t make him a girl anymore than wearing a kilt makes him a Scotsman.
His primary school head teacher is said to have insisted their child was treated as a boy despite his behaviour.
I bet his/her days are numbered.
He wore a bikini for swimming lessons, had Barbie towels, wore ribbons in his hair and rode a pink scooter, according to The Sun.
About that psychiatrist?!
Experts have said it is highly unusual for a child of that age to be sure about such a huge change in their lives.
Under UK law, he will not be able to have hormone treatment – which will pave the way for surgery – until passing puberty.
German Kim Petras became the world’s youngest transsexual at 16 earlier this year, changing her name from Tim.
The Christian Institute gives further information:
Critics of sex change operations say that transsexualism involves a psychological problem, not a physical one, and so radical physical surgery is inappropriate.
Many transsexuals regret their decision to live in the opposite sex. A Home Office report on transsexualism said: “Many people revert to their biological sex after living for some time in the opposite sex”.
Doctors from the NHS Portman Clinic – an internationally acclaimed centre – have stated, “what many patients find is that they are left with a mutilated body, but the internal conflicts remain”.
So for the third time, where’s the psychiatrist for this poor boy?
In a workplace staff magazine (place to remain nameless!!) that a friend showed me recently, their LBGT forum had been the subject of infighting over funding; questions from other interest groups – disability ones – had been asked in high places.
This brought a further letter from the LGBT supporters, asking if the raising of issues like this was a sign the organisation was institutionally prejudiced towards the gays and transgenders. It wasn’t, it was simply ‘hey, they are muscling in on our share of the pie!’ stuff, from what I could see.
Amazingly, the reply from the HR head honcho was that yes, it might well be indicative of that, and was a ‘concern’..
Sheesh!
Julia, I think what you wrote demonstrates the real aim of the ‘equality’ industry. To create a hierarchy of ‘equalities’ (ha!) in order to foment strife, so that while we proles are fighting with each other, there isn’t a united effort to rise up against our common enemy, New Labour and their globalist puppet masters.
I believe there are ‘only’ 6,000 transsexuals in the UK. I read recently that they’re not too happy about the LGBT movement because they get ignored.
When they have served their purpose, homosexuals, gypsies and other prized citizens will find themselves thrown off their pedestals. Maybe when we are all equally unequal with our masters we will rise up??
More power to the little boy! And forget the psychiatrist!
Welcome Carolyn,
In that case, don’t you mean more power to the little girl?
Firstly, sex change surgery/hormone therapy IS reccomended by ‘competent’ psychiatrists and psychologists – not in all cases, of course. Though i presume you mean a ‘competent’ psychiatrist who agrees with your narrow views?
Additionally, though i am not sure precisely which Home Office report you refer to, I know from academic experience that the phrase referring to ‘many transsexuals revert to their biological sex’ almost certainly refers to the period in which those wishing to undergo treatment must live as their desired gender for a considerable period before undergoing surgery (a number of years, from memory). This period is a part of the treatment for precisely that reason and therefore serves its purpose, allowing those who wish to change the opportunity to try out their new life before committing. This means that those who really need and will benefit from the surgery will be treated and (ideally) no-one is treated who will later regret it.
Oh, and the phrase ‘prized citizen’ could only come from someone who has never experienced any genuine prejudice as a result of some part of their identity, body or culture – those who fit the primary mainstream model are the truly ‘prized’ citizens.
Richard,
“Though i presume you mean a ‘competent’ psychiatrist who agrees with your narrow views?”
No, I mean one who knows how to deal with psychiatric problems like the young man in question has.
By ‘prized citizen’ I meant those being held up as special in order to divide society. I keep writing about it. As a Christian I have come up against true prejudice*.
*EDIT: Due to said divide and rule via stirring people up. It never used to be like this.
I’m beginning to wonder what exactly your field of expertise is Mr. Cowan. It seems that you believe your religious faith equips you to pass judgement across the fields of biology, psychology and anthropology.