Treason like this deserves the gallows
This blog has only been going for a few months, but I have stated certain things for years, such as this: mass immigration is for social engineering purposes. That’s because the mainstream parties are controlled by global elites who want an end of national sovereignty to create a global government.
Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett has announced that:
The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”.
He said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its “core working class vote”.
As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.
In other words: lies. And the same goes for the promotion of celebrating diversity. The reason being that we then forget about who we are ourselves.
Critics said the revelations showed a “conspiracy” within Government to impose mass immigration for “cynical” political reasons.
This is absolute treason, to socially engineer a country to enable it to be sold out. A similar thing has been happening in Tibet, where the Communist Chinese government has been sending in droves of outsiders in order to change the demography to make it easier to keep the country under Chinese control.
Mr Neather wrote: “Earlier drafts [of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit] I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.
You have to ask yourself why the government would want to engineer a multicultural society that wasn’t going to occur naturally.
The “deliberate policy”, from late 2000 until “at least February last year”, when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.
Some 2.3 million migrants have been added to the population since then, according to Whitehall estimates quietly slipped out last month.
On Question Time on Thursday, Mr Straw was repeatedly quizzed about whether Labour’s immigration policies had left the door open for the BNP.
Of course, he denied it. It’s strange how this article should appear the day after Nick Griffin’s appearance on Question Time, but we see how Straw was refusing to state the obvious.
Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: “Now at least the truth is out, and it’s dynamite.
“Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock up but also a conspiracy. They were right.
“This Government has admitted three million immigrants for cynical political reasons concealed by dodgy economic camouflage.”
The chairmen of the cross-party Group for Balanced Migration, MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames, said: “We welcome this statement by an ex-adviser, which the whole country knows to be true.
“It is the first beam of truth that has officially been shone on the immigration issue in Britain.”
But still, the Home Office try to send us packing with crumbs of comfort, like the “new flexible points based system” and ID cards for foreign nationals.
“The British people can be confident that immigration is under control.”
Confident? When our Home Secretary Alan Johnson is on record saying earlier this year that he “did not lie awake at night” worrying about the population hitting 70 million, which it is predicted to be by 2029.
Immigrant numbers have fallen only 10,000 from the last ONS projections two years ago.
They predict 180,000 new arrivals every year over the next quarter century.
When the immigrant ‘baby boom’ is taken into account, migration will account for two thirds of population growth.
So more diversity for us all to celebrate while we get absorbed into a global dictatorship. The EU section is already nicely taking shape.
I don’t generally favour the death penalty, but I would make an exception for traitors.