EU wants more GM
Another attack on common sense and a kick in the teeth for those of us – the majority – who don’t want all life on the planet endangered with genetically modified crops.
BRUSSELS — The European Commission began a new push Tuesday to allow farmers in Europe to grow more biotech crops, clearing a genetically modified potato for cultivation despite persistent public opposition to the technology.
In the first such step in more than a decade, the commission approved the Amflora potato produced by the German company BASF for cultivation inside the 27-country European Union. John Dalli, the bloc’s health commissioner, said the potatoes could be planted in Europe, with some conditions, as soon as next month.
BASF? So this is what they are doing since the demise of the videotape. The potatoes could be planted in Europe as soon as next month. No point asking us proles what we want.
The potato is engineered to be unusually rich in a starch suitable for making glossy paper and other products, as well as for feeding animals.
Currently the only other biotech crop grown in Europe is a type of corn produced by Monsanto, which was approved in 1998. On Tuesday, the commission also approved three additional types of genetically modified corn by Monsanto for food and feed, but those are for import and processing rather than cultivation.
Do I take it that these seeds are going to be sold to Third World farmers for an exorbitant price? And they will have to buy the patented seed from Monsanto every year thereafter. I think neocolonialism is probably the right word.
For the biotech industry, the decisions handed down by Mr. Dalli, who took office last month, could signal the emergence of a major new advocate for genetically modified products in Europe.
I wonder how long the biotech industry tended this weed.
At a news conference in Brussels, Mr. Dalli, who is from Malta, also said he would present a proposal this summer to give national governments more authority to decide whether to allow genetically modified crops to be grown within their borders. That could make it easier for biotech-friendly states to go ahead with planting certain new products even when other states disapprove of the technology.
When the EU grants national governments more authority, they must be up to something. Perhaps they expect two or three governments to risk the health of their people and farming industry with GM crops and the others will join in out of jealousy.
“Responsible innovation will be my guiding principle when dealing with innovative technologies,” he said.
That’s why one of the first things he has done is approve these crops with unknown consequences?
The bloc has long been divided over biotech crops, with countries like Britain favoring the technology and Austria in fierce opposition.
“We feel encouraged by this decisive regulatory approach,” said Willy De Greef, the secretary general for a group representing the biotech industry, EuropaBio. The “approvals represent a step in the right direction and a return to science-based decision making,” he said.
Can you see what he’s done there? He said, “a return to science-based decision making.” In other words, if you have concerns, that makes you a Neanderthal with the same IQ as a cauliflower. But of course, we all believe the scientists, don’t we? They would never tell us lies to make money or further an agenda.
The commission first forwarded an application to grow the potato to governments in May 2004. When a number of countries raised objections, the commission sent the application to experts at the European Food Safety Authority.
Experts at the authority approved the application for the potato in 2006 and 2007, and again in 2009. But because member governments were repeatedly unable to reach a qualified majority to approve the potato, the commission on Tuesday invoked its power to approve the application by a form of fiat.
This means we live in a technocracy, not a democracy.
That procedure had only been used once before to get a biotech seed to market for cultivation in Europe. The seed, called Bt176 and produced by Syngenta, no longer is grown in Europe.
The Amflora potato looks like any garden-variety spud, but in developing it, BASF included a marker gene as a way of identifying plant cells that successfully produced the desired type of starch. Some scientists have linked the marker gene to antibiotic resistance in humans, raising concerns that the ill and the elderly, especially, could become more vulnerable to disease.
I imagine that’s a plus from some of these people’s point of view.
Environmentalists reacted with fury to the decision, saying that Mr. Dalli had overstepped his mandate.
For a change, I agree with them.
The commissioner “only needed weeks in his new position to show such flagrant support for industry interests ahead of his own portfolio,” said Martin Häusling, a German member of the European Parliament for the Greens.
Opinion polls have consistently shown that a majority of European consumers are apprehensive about such technology.
Neanderthals.
The European Commission, however, wants to allow more gene-altered products into the Union to remove an irritant in trade relations with the United States and other countries that use them — and to lower costs for European farmers and industry.
“The way is now clear for commercial cultivation of Amflora this year,” Peter Eckes, the president of BASF Plant Science, said in a statement on the company’s Web site. “Amflora will strengthen the international position of the European potato starch industry.”
There are huge deposits of all types of traditional seeds being stored in Norway, presumably so that when this part of the population reduction programme has finished, the elite can grow the good stuff again.
If anyone thinks this is another of my crazy conspiracy theories then perhaps they could offer conclusive proof that GM crops are safe to eat and safe for the environment, because they are getting the blame for disappearing bees on both sides of the Atlantic, particularly in the USA where GM crops are more prevalent.
And as Albert Einstein is credited with saying: “If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left. No more bees, no more pollination, no more plants, no more animals, no more man.”

I would, as a scientist, say that current GM crops are safe. However, I don’t trust the EU’s motives any more. My default position is that if the EU are pushing this through then they are up to something nasty.
The first thing that comes to mind is total control of the food supply. GM farmers cannot retain seed for planting next year. They have to buy new every year. So if the EU wanted to put a country’s farmers out of business they simply crank up the price one year so no farmer can afford it. That totally stops the food supply in that country. Much cheaper than war.
Second, even though I think the current GM foods are safe, it would not be difficult to provide a tainted crop one year. The farmers have no backup stock and they will have grown accustomed to receiving good stock each year. They won’t even think to test it. What genes might be in a particular country’s seedstock in ten or twenty years? Nobody will notice a thing until it’s been eaten. Then, when they blame the food, they’ll be told ‘Nonsense. You’ve been eating that stuff for a decade. It can’t be the food’.
It’s not so much what the EU do with it now that worries me. It’s what they will be able to do once it’s all installed.
They play the long game, remember.
I do not want to eat anything that has been jiggered about with. I don’t care if it’s safe (just like thalidomide, ritalin and mercury, eh?), I just do not want it.
It is a Pandora’s box, with the exception that once it is introduced, there is no hope.
Leg-iron,
You are doubtless a better scientist than I am (evolution science excepted…;-)
Yes, the globalists are playing the long game and always have been. Like you say, they could mess up any country’s food supply in under a year, either with the economics or genetics. The ultimate in biowarfare. It doesn’t do anything for their friends in the arms industry who are normally the main beneficiaries of their war games, but obviously, Monsanto et al will be eating out their hands as well, or is that vice-versa?
Corporations and now scientists seem to run the world. Politicians are just elected to say, “Yessum boss,” implement the rules that will make their masters more powerful and make sure we proles ‘comply’.
And it’s always to save the planet/the cheeldren, so if you disagree you must be mentally ill or a subversive.
We’re in trouble. Vive la resistance!
English,
I totally agree. I just don’t like the idea and it is unnecessary. I know an expert in farm animal breeding and he can get the specific traits he wants after not many generations of selective breeding.
It is not difficult to feed the world without taking risks like this, but it is all about centralised control. Just as well my friend has retired, as his line of business will probably be gone soon. The globalists don’t want so many people anyway, which is the reason they love mercury in vaccines, aspartame in drinks, wars, abortion, homosexuality and now GMO.
It doesn’t do anything for their friends in the arms industry
Oh, yes it does. When food is scarce, people want guns.
In his briefing John Dalli stated “the consumers and patients come first” Without having any experience of genetically modified products or farming experience he gave the go ahead to GM potatoes. This is living proof and confirmation of his arrogant past. He always said one thing and then he does exactly the opposite.
John Dalli has no expertise in this field. He is an accountant with a gift for manipulating figures to cover up his incompetence in controlling the budgets and targets he had set himself.
In this case everyone comes last. If this got into the food chain most Europeans will end up seriously ill or we could also have another situation like THALIDOMIDE but on a much larger scale.
John Dalli knows nothing about GMO. His expertise is in arrogance, incompetence, lies, political scandals and making false and malicious accusations. He is also an expert in selling national assets without authority for a pittance as he did with the sale of Mid-Med Bank in Malta.
Dalli falsely and maliciously accused Joseph Ellul-Grech and the Malta Labour Party of sending 20,000 anonymous letters claiming to defame him. Ellul-Grech was acquitted of all charges and the Labour Party were absolved of all connection to this serious crime. However, the Police traced the stationery that was used back to Parliament. John Dalli had the means, motive and the opportunity to abuse public funds to do this to cover up his involvement in the Daewoo scandal. To confirm this visit http://john-dalli-eu-cv.blogspot.com and the links on this blog.
Due to his past history and his current arrogance and incompetence he should be made to resign.
Thank you for that info and the link. It looks very interesting. I will study it closer when time permits.