You are not your own
The Bible says: ye are not your own – For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s.
The scripture of course refers to Christ’s sacrifice.
But you are not your own in another sense in New Labour’s sick new world. As far as homosexuality is concerned, we are expected to accept it or shut up, even under our own roof! The government/EU expects to override our consciences and get away with it.
A gay couple were turned away from a Berkshire guest house by the owner who said it was “against her convictions” for two men to share a bed.
Michael Black and John Morgan, from Brampton, Cambridgeshire, had booked a double room at the Swiss B&B, Terry’s Lane, in Cookham, for Friday night.
But when they arrived owner Susanne Wilkinson refused to let them stay.
She admitted she did turn the couple away because it was against her policy to accommodate same sex couples.
Her home; her policy. But that no longer means anything today.
The couple have now reported the matter to Thames Valley Police.
And how they must have loved doing it.
Under the Equality Act 2006 it is illegal to discriminate against people on the grounds of sexual orientation.
Ms Wilkinson told the BBC: “They gave me no prior warning and I couldn’t offer them another room as I was fully booked.
“I don’t see why I should change my mind and my beliefs I’ve held for years just because the government should force it on me.
Of course you shouldn’t. A lot of these homosexuals demand to be understood, but go crying to the police about someone else’s beliefs and feelings.
“I am not a hotel, I am a guest house and this is a private house.”
An Englishman’s home is no longer his castle if a pair of men want to share a bed in it.
Mr Black and Mr Morgan were in the village, near Maidenhead, to meet some friends for dinner and to see a local play.
Mr Black told the BBC: “We’re two respectable middle-aged men – John is leader of the Lib Dem group on Huntingdon Town Council.
Respectable? Hell’s teeth.
John is leader of the Lib Dem group. He must be loving the attention. Basking in the wicked discrimination that meant he had to find another bed to share with his boyfriend.
Owner apologised
“This was the first time either of us had experienced homophobia at first hand, despite being aged 56 and 62. We were shocked and embarrassed.
Now hold on. They had never experienced homophobia before at their age? So what is all this public re-education (diversity training) and Stonewall’s infiltration of schools to stamp out ‘homophobic bullying’ all about then?
“Mrs Wilkinson saw us both before we got out of the car and immediately acted in an unwelcoming, cold way, but my boyfriend and I were polite and friendly.
Ah, they’re the good guys, you see.
“She said if we’d told her in advance she would have told us not to come.
But they either didn’t have the decency to explain their situation or wanted to make a big deal out of Mrs Wilkinson’s beliefs and demand she changes her policy as to who she has to stay under her own roof.
“She apologised for turning us away. I asked for a refund of the deposit, which she gave me without quibble.
“We stayed polite and, to be fair, she wasn’t rude or abusive.
Unlike these two, who abused her by reporting her to the police for her beliefs. Sometimes I have to pinch myself that these things are really happening in our country today.
‘Civil matter’
“All she said about her reasons for turning us away was that it went against her convictions for us to stay there.
“We’ve since told a large number of friends and acquaintances and the reaction has consistently been amazement that this should have happened.
That’s because we live in a climate of fear. Many people are scared to nail their colours to the mast – on any subject.
“I’ve reported the matter to Thames Valley Police who have confirmed that they are following it up.”
Of course they are. They have to. No doubt proper, serious crimes cannot be dealt with because the police have to deal with poseurs whose feelings have been hurt.
Thames Valley Police said the call had been logged as a homophobic incident.
Special treatment. Tougher sentences. Equality never was going to be enough for some of them.
A spokeswoman said: “As the people live outside of the force area, we have asked Cambridgeshire Constabulary to speak to the individuals concerned.”
More police time wasted.
A spokesman for Stonewall, which campaigns for equality and justice for lesbians, gay men and bisexuals, said turning someone away on the grounds of sexual orientation was illegal.
Derek Munn, director of public affairs, said: “Stonewall was delighted when the law changed in 2007 so that lesbian and gay couples could go on their holidays like anyone else.
They always could go on holiday. The difference now is that they think they don’t have to respect the people they are staying with.
“In open and shut cases of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation the law’s quite clear – it’s illegal for businesses to turn away gay customers or discriminate against them when providing goods or services, and this can’t be overridden by personal prejudice.”
It is the same old line: personal prejudice.
A sincere belief is not the same as personal prejudice, which suggests malice, which is not the case here.
Unlike the personal prejudice of homosexuals who seek out Christian hoteliers so they can make a show of being refused a double bed for them to fornicate on?
The law must be changed to accommodate people’s conscience.
——————
P.S. Let me remind you that the early homosexual activists knew they would have to destroy the traditional family unit in order to feel fully ‘equal’. And as a strong and free society depends on strong family bonds, they are actually destroying our society. The same is true of the use of pornography and New Labour’s sex ‘education’. By changing the natural bonding rules, those human bonds become weaker – one night stands, homosexual liaisons, single parents – and thus society becomes weaker and collectively we are less able to stand up to the increasing amount of authority which is depriving us of our freedom.
“they didn’t have the decency to explain their situation”
Right. And Mrs Wilkinson didn’t have the decency to explain that she’s a bit of a self righteous homophobe.
I’m a self righteous homophobe as well. Good on Mrs Wilkinson for having the bottle to tell two old queens they were not welcome in her house.
PS Haven’t seen Ian for weeks, but a bit of good, old fashioned heterosexuality brings him right out of the woodwork!
PPS Why not ‘celebrate’ my heterosexuality, at tax-payers expense?
Quite right Ian Pattinson. Why would they have had to “explain their situation” when the law says it’s illegal for businesses to turn away gay customers or discriminate against them when providing goods or services.
She broke the law, they called the police – what’s wrong with that?
For what it’s worth I actually think the law is a bit silly when it comes to privately run B&Bs and guesthouses as I would like to be able to discriminate if I owned one!
James,
New Labour has introduced thousands of “laws,” many of which have been detrimental to the British people. It is time for a bit of civil disobedience if it is necessary to preserve one’s conscience and stand up for what is right.
The powers that be do not care about homosexuals. They are being *used* in their social engineering chess game. The faith which has underpinned our society is being undermined. It is collapsing and will continue to. People who consider themselves to be homosexuals will suffer too. Theirs is merely a temporary honouring until their ‘use-by’ date has expired, i.e. when every aspect of church, family and community is controlled by the State.
English,
I thought I’d let you and Stewart obsess about homosexuality for a while without being reminded how camp it makes you sound. But it’s time for me to knock on your closet door and see if you’re okay.
Been busy working on my comic and various other projects.
Mrs Wilkinson didn’t take a principled stand. A principled stand would have been for her to declare up front what her prejudices were in her adverts and then try to argue her point. But she didn’t do that, she let her prejudice show when she thought there wouldn’t be any come back and now she’s suffering for it.
Mr Pattinson,
I’m fine, thanks for the enquiry.
Why is everything that runs contrary to your opinion a ‘prejudice’?
Surely you are ‘prejudiced’ against those that call themselves Christian, and you are well within your rights to be (but in my opinion, wrong).
If you really are a lover of liberty, you would agree with me that a B & B should be able to discriminate on whatever grounds the owner likes. If they are being foolish, they will either change their foolish ways or go bust.
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with ‘personal prejudice’ at all. So the guest house woman didn’t want these men’s custom. As one was an ‘out and proud’ Lib Dem councillor, neither would I. Their being gay wouldn’t bother me though. Then again, it’s not my house and if I’m honest, I can’t say I’d be comfortable with gay sex happening in my house. I wouldn’t be happy with heterosexual sex happening here either, if I wasn’t involved.
She can’t advertise ‘no Gays’ because the authorities would be all over her. She can advertise ‘no smokers’ and she’d probably get a grant for that. Equality, eh?
We all have personal prejudices. I don’t have entire groups I’m prejudiced against, but there are some individuals I really, really hate enough to want to watch while they are skinned and salted. There’s nothing wrong with holding a personal prejudice, as long as it doesn’t turn into burning upside-down crosses on people’s lawns or nailing cats to their front doors. That’s not ‘prejudice’, that’s ‘criminal damage/ GBH/ ABH’ and we already have laws against that. Prejudice does not automatically escalate. It needs a Hitler or a Che Guevara or a Stalin figure to do that.
Not so long ago, anyone turned away by a guest house would have grumbled, never visited again and told all their friends about it. Now, they feel they can call the police and get all the major newspapers to cover the story. Now all it takes is a funny look and the law gets called in because people are so weak, so self-important, so childish that any slight against one is taken as a declaration of war on ‘the (insert Righteous-created ghetto) community’.
There used to be a community. A whole one. Now it’s all this-community and that-community and the-other-community and every one of them gets into a right tantrum whenever they think they are being slighted. The original community is now a pigeonholed and compartmentalised series of special-interest groups. There is no longer any such thing as ’society’. It’s Neolithic tribalism.
While we all fight amongst ourselves, someone, somewhere is laughing.
I’ll have a rant about that later.
Stewart – the powers that be have no more use for Muslims and no more use for travellers. They are already getting a backlash. All the favoured groups will be called in, one by one, like a Djinn calling in those favours it granted.
It won’t just be the militant homosexuals who will suffer, just as it won’t be only the radical Islamists or the unpleasant travellers. It’ll be everyone.
A set-up? Definitely. From May 2007: http://leg-iron.livejournal.com/4894.html
I hadn’t then realised just how diverse the scheme was.
Hi Leg-iron,
I didn’t realise you’d been blogging for three years (plus?). I think we agree completely about the divide and rule part of the agenda. You made very good points back in 2007, while it was still un-PC to criticise immigration.
Talking of “personal prejudice,” we all have them. And they stem from all sorts of influences, yet “hatred” is all that the particular minority usually wants to concentrate on, which shows their lack of empathy and understanding for others. This is particularly true of those who identify themselves with ‘gay rights’.
Why are they afraid of honest and open debate? Like you wrote in 2007, Object, and you are branded fascist/Nazi/repressive/bigot.
Why should the stirring in someone else’s loins force me to ignore my conscience and change my values – values which have kept this country relatively free and civilised compared to most?
When there are very few people left who have held onto their values and resisted the tyranny that Stonewall et al are ensuring are imposed, these very same groups, once no longer pets, will come running for protection to the very people they tried to bully and criminalise.
I think it will increasingly be dog-eat-dog out there and when it is no longer in vogue to be a supporter of ‘gay rights’ – when homosexuals are just treated like common or garden slugs like the rest of us, then when they are being beaten up and the police have been told to ignore “homophobia”, they will need someone left who has values and humanity to intercede on their behalf. They would expect me as a Christian to help and I hope that I would be the Good Samaritan.
Stewart,
The values which made this country great include acceptance of people who are different and encouraging them to contribute to a better society. Not always as quickly as we should, but in the end.
I’d love to have an open and honest debate with you, but I don’t think you’re all that honest about your true motivations. And English tries to change the rules every time he’s shown to be wrong, so I won’t be having one with him either.
Mr Pattinson,
‘The values which made this country great include acceptance of people who are different and encouraging them to contribute to a better society. ‘
There has never been a time in this nation’s history when its people were asked ‘Would you like to import 6 million foreigners, most of whom will need to be fed, clothed, housed and sheltered at your expense, and not a small minority of them will hate you for your kindness?’ Nor have they ever been asked ‘Would you like us to teach your children about the pleasures of anal sex, lesbianism and cross-dressing?’. Some people just don’t like this, they don’t like being told what to think or say, they don’t like being criminalised for an opinion.
The values which made this country great are a dim and distant memory, that is why we are no longer great.
PS. Keep dreaming on the proving me wrong thing
Ian,
As I said on Tom Harris’s blog, English keeps trouncing you and he’s done it again.
What made this country great was nothing to do with accepting deviant lifestyles. Unless you can demonstrate otherwise.
English and I do debate with you openly and honestly. You just don’t like the fact that we have the nerve to say what most people are thinking.
Stewart,
I have just decimated Tom Harris on his blog, but I doubt my comment will see the light of day.
I am convinced that the day will come that either people like me and you, or people like Harris and Brown, will be held to account. Take your pick.
I know my figures; I know my facts; I know the truth.
These evil men know nothing, and I pray for the day that they repent; and if they are not willing, then the day that they meet God. Then the truth will out.
English, Stewart,
I’m not sure how constantly being shown to be wrong counts as trouncing me. But then, you do have a different value system, one which doesn’t value reality.
6 million foreignes (if you’re numbers are correct, I bet there’s some way in which they’re wrong) most of whom came here to work, build infrastructure, pay taxes and add to our culture. I’m sure some of them do hate you, but you’re not very likeable people.
You claim to know your facts and figures, but when asked to show your sources you always refuse. I think you know how unreliable they are and how easily they can be debunked. Cite me a few sources, or stay in your fantasy land where lying and changing the argument every time you’re caught in a lie count as winning an argument.
Mr Pattinson,
When you’ve lost the argument, you always resort to slurs and name-calling. Oh, you already have.
Those concerned with the so called benefits of migration can click the link to see for themselves. No, the link is not a Christian website, it is simply the truth.
http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/outlookForMigration.php
Those who doubt that their children are being indoctrinated with the benefits of homosexuality, try:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1056415/Teach-pleasure-gay-sex-children-young-say-researchers.html
or:
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/feb/10022403.html
English,
I see Tom hasn’t approved your comments. You can post them here if you wish (of course). These New Labour destroyers will be held to account unless they change sharpish. Tom “I’m a Christian, but not a very good one” Harris, Gordon “Son of the Manse” Brown and Tony “I’m a Catholic now, actually” have all conspired to punish Christians for our beliefs.
The truth will out and every knee shall bow to Christ.
You can imagine these three saying, “I’ve got a bit of arthritis, actually”.
Stewart,
The comments were basically along the lines of him being a false Christian, liar and war-monger, along with being an expenses thief and a call for his repentance. His reply was very short, simply confirming that he had censored my comments and calling me a Nazi, presumably because highlighting an MP’s voting record, expenses theft and general smug arrogance was a central tenet of National Socialism.
I think he’s realised I won’t be voting Labour on polling day.
Those who will not kneel willingly will be made to, by the ruler, with a rod of iron.
Maybe Tom’s been in with the wrong crowd for so long, he can no longer tell right from wrong, like the rest of them. It looks like he got a small sniff of power (transport minister) and forgot who he is really meant to serve.
I don’t think he ripped us off too badly re. expenses. It’s his anti-Christian record that dismays me.
Maybe he’ll have a Road to Damascus experience??
Oh, and this is what Tom thinks about me…
Stewart, the only difference between you and Abu Hamza is a right hand and a different holy book.
Hey Stewart,
being grateful that Tom only ripped you off a little bit is kinda like Stockholm Syndrome. Babies bottles? Cots?
I just sent him a link, but he modded it.
Here it is, just in case you or anyone else is interested. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cN_N8CpPIjY
English,
Migrationwatch? A “think tank” set up so the unthinking can believe that their prejudice is somehow justified. The bias is obvious, right there in the name, but even then they can’t stay on message. In 2007 they admitted that immigration had benefited the country. I doubt they realised they were doing so, though. (They said that immigration had “only” benefitted the economy by the equivalent of 4p per person per week. It was later shown that they based their calculations only on part of the increased activity due to immigration. So, a benefit, by their own admission, and larger than they thought.)
The Daily Mail? I can’t say I’m surprised. But if you bother to read to the bottom the report you’ll find- “Project leader Dr Elizabeth Atkinson said the seminar had no connection with No Outsiders work in classrooms. ‘The seminar is part of a long-standing academic debate and has nothing to do with schools,’ she said. ‘It has no connection with sex education.’” The Mail likes to publish articles which push all their readers’ buttons, then stick a bit at the end which tells the truth, safe in the knowledge that most of their audience will have overheated before then and not get that far. I think it’s a sneaky way of avoiding rulings against them. That and having their editor run the Press Complaints Commission.
Life Site News is new to me, but their article seems upset that schools will be teaching children. I thought schools were for teaching in. Plus, they’re angry about something that 99.96% of parents currently approve of, so they’re not on very solid ground.
Thank you for finaly citing some sources. Sorry they don’t prove anything.
Mr Pattinson,
Your appear pathologically determined to continue to state your points of view are all facts, and that everybody else’s opinions are all wrong, and a period of foot-stamping repeatedly takes place whenever you are reminded of your errors.
If you re-read what you have posted, you will see how ridiculous it sounds. Whether it’s 4 pence or 50 pence per person, was it really worth all the shootings, stabbings, drugs, prostitution, the decimation of the national identity, the building of forts in the shape of mosques, the wearing of military uniform in the shape of burqas, etc, etc? You might feel enriched by multiculturalism, unlike these people:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kriss_Donald.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1160552.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5060719/Jimmy-Mizen-killer-convicted-of-murder.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/beds/bucks/herts/6740063.stm
The fact that an organisation which has been set up to monitor immigration should be called ‘MigrationWatch’ is hardly an indication of bias. It’s founder is a Knight of the Realm, no less, not what you might like to refer to as a knuckle-dragger. That the figure you cite changed between 2007 and last year is hardly surprising, due to the additional 200,000 odd people who added to the numbers of immigrants during that period. That MigrationWatch are prepared to correct figures is an indication that they are not biased. If you do not like their findings, you could always try The House of Lords and their findings. Are they ‘biased’?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1583500/Limit-immigration-warns-House-of-Lords.html
It is a typical tactic of so-called ‘liberals’ to decry all and any report highlighted in the Daily Mail. Just because it appears there, does not automatically discount the truth of a matter.
It is arrant nonsense to suggest that 99.6% of parents currently approve of their children being taught the benefits of buggery. Is this reallyacceptable?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/mar/11/gayrights.books
PS Is The Guardian pink enough for you, or is that biased as well?
PS,
Forgive the spelling mistakes, won’t you?
I’m just a common man.
English,
I’m determined to keep stating facts. Those facts, and experience and empathy, colour my opinions.
My opinion is that you’re a sad little man who feels powerless and is looking for someone to blame. You’ve latched onto homosexuals, immigrants and muslims and go off looking for people saying what you want to hear to reinforce your prejudices.
I live in the real world. It’s a complicated, imperfect and sometimes scary place. But it’s better than the fantasy land you occupy.
It’s perfectly acceptable to decry the Daily Mail when they publish a story like you linked to. They made up a controversy where none existed and got a bunch of homophobes’ knickers in a twist. Just doing their job, which is to make you hate someone. People don’t mock the Daily Mail because it’s trendy to do so. They do it because the Mail is dedicated to lying and reinforcing prejudices.
Congratulations on finding two reports of non-white racists. The other two reports don’t mention race at all so I’m not sure what the relevance is. Would you now like to go away and find the numbers for all racially motivated crimes? You’ll find there are people in every community who hate some other group for no good reason and are stupid enough to act that hatred out violently. That some of those people are black or asian doesn’t prove anything except that moronic attitudes know no racial barrier. Perhaps you want to suggest that this country would be perfect if only it were 100% white and christian. Though you’d be wrong.
Mr Pattinson,
‘I’m determined to keep stating facts. Those facts, and experience and empathy, colour my opinions.’
Well, go on then, we’re waiting. Your last post was just ad hominem abuse.
Why does the Met have a special division, Operation Trident, to deal specifically with black violence, particularly gun, knife and drug related?
Why did Sir Paul Condon, the ex Met Commissioner, say that the majority of street muggings in the capital were carried out by blacks?
Even Blair was forced to acknowledge the wonders of the Multi-Cult. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2007/apr/12/ukcrime.race
Anybody can see the enormously disproportionate representation of ethnic minorities in these figures of Prison Inmates, as laid out in the National Crime Statistics report 2008/2009, the latest available figures.
‘At 30 June 2009 there were 11,350 foreign nationals in prisons in England and Wales from
165 different countries. Ten of these countries accounted for nearly one-half of the foreign
nationals in prisons. Jamaica, Nigeria and the Irish Republic are the countries with the most
nationals in prison establishments.
At 30 June 2008, the latest published data, over one-quarter of the prison population whose
ethnicity was recorded were from a minority ethnic group. Among British nationals 20% of
the population were from a minority ethnic group. 71% of foreign national prisoners were
from a minority ethnic group.’
It seems to me to be obvious that, if a country imports millions of foreigners, not a small number of whom do not share the host country’s values, ethnicity or religion, to the point where the indigenous population begins to feel marginalised, there is an awful tendency for unrest. Suicide bombing was unheard of, in this country, until some ‘diverse’ fellows slaughtered dozens on buses and trains. It will happen again, in fact it did happen again, at Glasgow Airport, the only difference this time was the ineptitude of the attackers. It will continue to happen, as will all the stabbings, shootings, drug violence, gang warfare, etc. It will continue because people like me are decried as bigots, by those willing to exchange their own culture, history, traditions, laws and people for the idea of being broad minded and liberal, your progressive, permissive, free thinking little flag waved in the faces of all and sundry, in a pathetic attempt at achieving cheap applause for your egalitarianism.
If I was, as you claim ‘looking for some-one to blame’, I need look no further than you, and those like you.
PS Are you going to answer the points raised in my previous post, or ignore them, as they inconveniently prove you wrong? Again.
PPS Here, sadly, are some more beneficiaries of the rich tapestry of multi-cultural harmony that is now the UK. There are more, I’m afraid, should you wish ‘poo poo’ the causes of their deaths, as you did about other victims I highlighted recently.
http://www.expressandstar.com/latest/2008/04/05/nearly-1000-was-on-victim-says-qc/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1018907/Illegal-immigrants-strangled-mugging-victims-headlocks-sentenced-30-years.html
http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/content/towerhamlets/advertiser/news/story.aspx?
brand=ELAOnline&category=news&tBrand=northlondon24&tCategory=newsela&itemid=WeED30%20Nov%202007%2019:11:41:183
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article3490542.ece
http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk/forestdale/guilty-Billy-Ward-s-murder/article-415644-detail/article.html
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23529484-life-for-killer-16-who-stabbed-boy-over-dirty-look.do
Would you have a problem with a foreign-born doctor saving the life of someone you love or do you enjoy ‘pick and choosing’ those who are allowed to come here.
English,
Your argument becomes even less coherent the more you try to justify it. You’re going for catch-all racism now?
You’re just trawling the net now for white folks killed by black or brown ones. That proves nothing and is just a massive insult to the victims. Take off the blinkers and you’ll see there are also whites killed by whites, blacks killed by white etc. etc.
Why should I care what Blair said? The man has a history of lying.
I notice no link for your Sir Paul Condon assertion. Rod Liddle made a similar pronouncement, which has been shown to be utter nonsense.
http://charlottegore.com/2009/12/05/rod-liddle-has-shit-for-brains.html
and
http://www.fivechinesecrackers.com/2009/12/rod-liddle-more-racist-than-bnp.html
You are a bigot. There’s no point denying it. You’re determined to blame your chosen bad guys for everything you perceive to be wrong (which isn’t the same as everything that is wrong, but that’s a different argument). And you call those of us who understand that reality isn’t as simple as your narrow mind wants it to be names.
Cardiff Blogger,
I obviously would not object to a foreign born Dr saving a loved one’s life, but you have used an emotive hypothesis that misses the point.
We are not suffering a destruction of infra-structure, in education, the justice system, housing and the NHS because of the enormous strain placed upon it by the importation of 200,000 Doctors a year, are we? I also think that the countries that we ‘poach’ them from are suffering because of the loss of medical talent.
With literally millions of people being paid to do absolutely nothing in the UK, it is totally unnecessary to import people to fill jobs that our own people could and should be trained to do.
You suggest I would like to ‘pick and choose’ those who should be allowed to come here.
Too right.
Mr Pattinson,
Here’s your link: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1371691/Quarter-of-men-accused-are-black.html
In what way is this enriching? http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/2912750/Sun-immigration-survey-day-2-Violence-on-the-streets.html
Highlighting somebody I have never mentioned as proof of my racism is a childish tactic, one which most readers will see through straightaway.
Home office prison population figures and ONS stats prove that non-whites are more likely to commit violent street crimes than whites, when one considers the relative size of their populations. The ex Prime Minister agrees. So does the ex Met Commissioner.
It is not bigoted to tell the truth. It is a very dangerous thing to deny the truth, to brand as liars those who tell the truth. Perhaps you’ll start thinking for yourself, one day, but I fear the damage may be permanent.
PS Are you going to answer the questions posed in previous posts, or just ignore them, because you know you’re wrong? (That’s the second time I’ve asked you, were you hoping I’d forget?)
Mr Pattinson,
You could try this: http://www.inthenews.co.uk/news/autocodes/countries/romania/london-immigration-linked-to-crime-$1138569.htm
Or this: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/may/18/immigration.ukcrime
Inconvenient truth? Where have I heard that before?
English,
I don’t need to prove your racism, you’re doing a perfectly good job of it all by yourself.
The House of Lords report was the one Migrationwatch misinterpreted, if that’s what you mean by not answering questions. If you didn’t know that then you’re not doing your research are you. I don’t see why I should answer every one of your claims when so many of them are repetition. I have other stuff to do (more pages of my comic are up amongst other things). Just checking them out and responding to a few of them is more of a courtesy than you’ve previously done me. But then, I gave you more conclusive evidence of my argument.
I’m not pretending that all immigrants are angels, as you’d like to claim I am. But I have the sense to see that the problems aren’t all about race.
Mr Pattinson,
I never said that problems are caused by race, but by the importation of foreigners, most of whom just happen to be of a different race. There’s a big difference.
The House of Lords said that immigration was of no financial benefit to this nation whatsoever. In what way can that be misinterpreted?
PS Your comic is rubbish. Don’t give up your day job. (You have got one, right?)
English,
If you think something’s wrong then it must be right. New pages of the comic are published every Monday, or you can follow its RSS feed.
I’ve published a few novellas too. I’d recommend you start with Global Weirding.
Mr Pattinson,
No link for your porn?
Mr Pattinson,
When you say published…
All advertising must be paid for in advance!