One of the biggest “smoking guns” indicating that the attacks of 9/11 were orchestrated, not by Arabs in caves, but by elements within the US Administration, is the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building (aka WTC 7). Look at the video of the collapse, below, and ponder upon whether you have ever seen such a thing before that was not achieved by a controlled demolition.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is a group set up by architect Richard Gage, AIA, for fellow architectural and engineering professionals to counter the official story given to the public about the collapse of the three World Trade Centre skyscrapers on 11th September 2001.
The official account of Building 7’s collapse, incidentally, has been changed by NIST several times. Was it fire? Collateral damage from the Twin Towers? NIST have even said that hypothetical blast events are being considered for their contribution to the collapse of WTC 7.
A group called “Building What?” wants to raise awareness of this major clue which helps expose the real culprits of 9/11.
More than eight years after the tragedy of September 11, 2001, New York Supreme Court Justice Edward H. Lehner was hearing arguments in a courtroom less than a mile from Ground Zero about a ballot initiative to launch a new investigation of the 9/11 attacks. When the lawyer for the plaintiffs sponsoring the initiative explained that the 9/11 Commission report left many unanswered questions, including “Why did Building 7 come down,” the Judge replied quizzically, “Building what?”
Like Judge Lehner, millions of people do not know or remember only vaguely that a third tower called World Trade Center Building 7 also collapsed on September 11, 2001. In any other situation, the complete, free fall collapse of a 47-story skyscraper would be played over and over on the news. It would be discussed for years to come and building design codes would be completely rewritten. So, why does no one know about Building 7? And why did Building 7 come down?
The answers to these questions have far-reaching implications for our society. The goal of the “BuildingWhat?” campaign is to raise awareness of Building 7 so that together we can begin to address these questions.
Watch the TV Ad Millions of New Yorkers Will See:
The BBC reported the collapse 26 minutes early. Reporter Jane Standley was actually seen discussing the collapse on BBC World with Building 7 still standing behind her!
The studio anchorman that day was Philip Hayton. Members of We Are Change UK questioned him about the early reporting of WTC 7’s collapse during a speaking appearance.
Hayton failed to recollect even being in the studio on the day of 9/11– at first– but then recalls the situation when it is described in detail, including the actions of Jane Standley, who reported the collapse some 26 minutes in advance with WTC Building 7 still visible in the background.
“A lot of eyebrows were raised,” We Are Change reporters point out in summary, because many saw it as a clear controlled demolition, including a number of engineers. Hayton responded, pointing out that he was not aware of the situation with WTC 7. “This sounds so significant– I’m just amazed I didn’t know about this… This is completely news to me.”
“So, is there no official explanation?” Hayton further probed.
We Are Change continues to explain the delayed NIST report on WTC 7 as well as the response from a BBC editor who claimed 9/11 tapes were “lost” in a ‘cock-up.’
“I sense that you think there’s a conspiracy here– but you might be right,” Hayton concluded.