All Animals are Equal, but Some Animals are More Equal Than Others

Keep voting LibLabCon and it'll keep getting worse.

Keep voting LibLabCon and it’ll keep getting worse.

‘Twas always thus, of course, but in this age of “equality” you would think everything would have become almost ironed out by now so that we were all just about truly equal and bells of joy would be ringing out around the Western World, which has been tweaked over many decades to the point of near-perfection so that our society has reached a previously unheard of peak of compassion, tolerance and understanding.

We should be seeing homosexual Jews skipping down the road, hand-in-hand with bearded Muslim clerics, both grinning from ear to ear, such is the ecstasy experienced just by living in an all-inclusive, multicultural society where every ‘stakeholder’ is equally valued.

Marxist-Leninist trades union leaders should be addressing the Bullingdon Club boys to cheers of appreciation at experiencing the joys of diversity of opinion. You would expect the compassion, love, mutual understanding and respect to be oozing out of every pore.

You get my point.

It’s not quite like that in reality, is it? I remember how things were when this equality industry was still in first gear. Few people cared about someone else’s colour or religion. Sexuality was a private matter. We were shown some National Front skinheads on telly and a few murders of black children were made ‘high profile’ to make us think that society at large had a racist around every corner. Like today, you would think there was a paedophile living in every third house.

Mothers were there for us after school. There were no after-school clubs or pre-school nurseries. Grandparents, neighbours and older siblings looked after each others’ sprogs if need be until the women who chose to work got back home.

This was the 1970s. In the early 1990s I was working in an insurance office in London’s Oxford Street. There were tons of our Commonwealth Cousins, plus an American, a Frenchwoman and an Algerian to name some I remember. Still, there was no ‘racism’, ‘sexism’ (two of the three bosses were women), ‘religious intolerance’ (my best friend was a Muslim, probably because we both liked to spend an hour or five in pubs). Sexuality wasn’t mentioned. Nobody seemed to care what anyone else was. We were equal. Apart from the salaries, obviously.

But like the depiction on the Fabian Society’s stained glass window I showed two posts back, the God-given, natural order on Earth had to be smashed to smithereens so that it could be rebuilt to suit the aims of the Marxists.

The faux liberté, égalité, fraternité which has gradually built up over a long time has had a devastating effect on society.

The liberty part: when we are forced to be equal then freedom must go. It is unavoidable. Anyway, I conclusively demonstrated in 2010 that we have no rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

As for equality: we don’t actually have it. I was driven to write this post after reading the latest from Frank Davis, who reported that the World’s top PR companies have ruled out working with manmade climate change ‘deniers’.

Some of the world’s top PR companies have for the first time publicly ruled out working with climate change deniers, marking a fundamental shift in the multi-billion dollar industry that has grown up around the issue of global warming.

Public relations firms have played a critical role over the years in framing the debate on climate change and its solutions – as well as the extensive disinformation campaigns launched to block those initiatives.

Now a number of the top 25 global PR firms have told the Guardian they will not represent clients who deny man-made climate change, or take campaigns seeking to block regulations limiting carbon pollution.

How come these PR companies are brazenly turning down business from people who don’t agree with their beliefs, but Christian bakers on both sides of the Pond have been ordered to bake ‘wedding’ cakes for two people of the same gender contrary to their beliefs?

It’s a rhetorical question, of course. If you stick with the script, you can mostly do what you wish.

If you stand up for traditional family values, you’re an out-of-touch, homophobic, transphobic caveman who probably believes in the Sky Pixie. (The fact that the brainwashed always use the same phrases is proof that they have indeed been under mass mind control. I know this from many conversations with Dawkins’ disciples on his blog before I was banned.)

Yet Stonewall reps are allowed to directly influence schoolchildren with visits and the ‘material’ they send out, like these “teacher training packs,” which encourage teachers to talk to children as young as five about homosexual relationships and that boys should be allowed to express their feminine side by wearing dresses. They were given a £25,000 Government grant to help fund it.

And where does ‘positive discrimination’ fit into equality? All-women lists for selecting a political candidate being perhaps the most well-known example.

In fact, it may soon be illegal to criticise feminism.

It is not impossible that the future will be run mainly by women (I guess that was one of the aims of ‘family planning’). The EU is now planning to make it illegal to be intolerant of feminist views. A EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK NATIONAL STATUTE FOR THE PROMOTION OF TOLERANCE (Pdf) lists “anti-feminism” along with the usual areas of ‘discrimination’.

They are trying to force us men and the majority of women who oppose feminism to agree that a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle. According to a Netmums poll, “Only 1 in 7 women still call themselves a ‘Feminist’ – with younger women least likely to”.

If those in the EU get their way:

The purpose of this Statute is to….

(c) Eliminate hate crimes as defined in Section 1(c)
(d) Condemn all manifestations of intolerance based on bias, bigotry and prejudice.
(e) Take concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia.

(My emphasis.)

But a totalitarian clique declaring that totalitarian ideologies must be eliminated sounds good, but they won’t exterminate themselves.

Then it gives certain ‘guarantees’ like freedom of expression and religious freedom, but we’ve seen already how this is a lie. The very idea is to prevent even any bias. If this proposed statute is successful, the goalposts will be moved from ‘prejudice’ and ‘discrimination’ to mere ‘bias’. We must accept feminists treating us men and the vast majority of their non-compliant sisters as second class citizens or we get done for being biased.

Common Purpose will snap up the militant feministas. The less actual ability they have for their jobs the better as it will make for an even more clunking system that doesn’t work and people don’t get their pensions in winter because of ‘clerical errors’ and operations are botched or they fail to wake up from their anesthetic – the gas chambers of the future? Hitler started by gassing tens of thousands of mentally ill people in hospitals.

That’s another way to get rid of people who are a ‘problem’ in a police state, especially when Agenda 21 is properly up and running. You can go Soviet-style and have them diagnosed with mental illness and lock them away indefinitely. You could download child porn or a detailed terrorist plan to their hard drive and lock them up and completely destroy their reputation, or you could have some phony doctors (borrow some from ATOS) deliberately diagnose a disease that needs an operation and you’re on the sleeper to Auschwitz.

It’ll be like the Two Ronnies’ “The Worm That Turned” from 1980. From Wikipedia:

Diana Dors guest-starred in this spoof piece of dystopian fiction set in 2012 in which women rule England. Male and female gender roles are completely reversed, even down to men having women’s names and vice-versa. Men are housekeepers and wear women’s clothes, and law and order is managed by female guards in boots and hot pants.

Like Orwell, they just got the date wrong. And probably the hot pants. They’ll force us blokes to wear them to prove we’re not ‘biased’.

We don’t even need the EU’s ‘help’ – This member of the Labour Party has blogged:

Ever since I re-joined Labour after the 2010 election, the party’s approach to gender politics has concerned me. For a start Labour generally uses the word ‘equality’ in an Orwellian sense, not to describe equality but rather with securing exclusive, preferred rights for women, while giving free reign to some pretty aggressive anti-male rhetoric. But the culture of barely allowing any criticism or critique of this approach is if anything more disturbing, reflecting the authoritarian instincts of many of these activists and a weakness of values in the party.

Another thing I’ve been finding out over the years is that practically all the systems in place supposedly to help and protect us proles are often just a mirage. For example, the NHS (last year refused to treat me; legal action pending); the Citizens Advice Bureau (wrote one letter and received a whole load of lies back and refused to send even a second letter); the benefits system (many years ago I was denied income support for nearly two years, despite submitting sick notes, and had to take out a loan of £11,000 to pay off credit cards to get through it; I contacted several charities, none of which could or would help; judging by my dealings with the TPS (Telephone Preference Service), they clearly don’t want to catch the same few nuisance companies who have been at it for years.

As usual I’m going off on tangents, but it’s obviously important for totalitarian regimes to keep the people under the impression that they are cared about. False hope, like the lottery.

Nearly forgot about fraternity. Brotherhood was the last thing on their minds when they devised their demonic plans to remould the planet. Just the opposite: divide and conquer.

Never again will you be capable of ordinary human feeling. Everything will be dead inside you. Never again will you be capable of love, or friendship, or joy of living, or laughter, or curiosity, or courage, or integrity. You will be hollow. We shall squeeze you empty and then we shall fill you with ourselves. (‘1984′)

And more and more people seem to be buying into it all, despite the evidence to the contrary gained from personal experience and what they have seen happening to some of their friends and family let down by the judicial/health/welfare/education system and they still believe that the State is their surrogate parent.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>