Sometimes, Alex Jones and his guests set out the globalists’ agenda so clearly, it is awesome. Here he is, talking to our own Paul Joseph Watson about the armed troops who burned down homes and killed children in Uganda to evict them in the name of climate change.

This full spectrum analysis includes the topics of mainstream media silence, climate change and humanitarian scams, neo-colonialism under the guise of protecting against climate change, land grabs, and UN and Big Pharma eugenicists working towards population reduction as part of a global regime. Watson writes,

Armed troops acting on behalf of a British carbon trading company backed by the World Bank burned houses to the ground and killed children to evict Ugandans from their homes in the name of seizing land to protect against “global warming,” a shocking illustration of how the climate change con is a barbarian form of neo-colonialism.

The evictions were ordered by New Forests Company, an outfit that seizes land in Africa to grow trees then sells the “carbon credits” on to transnational corporations. The company is backed by the World Bank and HSBC. Its Board of Directors includes HSBC Managing Director Sajjad Sabur, as well as other former Goldman Sachs investment bankers.

The company claims residents of Kicucula left in a “peaceful” and “voluntary” manner, and yet the people tell a story of terror and bloodshed.

Villagers told of how armed “security forces” stormed their village and torched houses, burning an eight-year-child to death as they threatened to murder anyone who resisted while beating others.

“We were in church,” recalled Jean-Marie Tushabe, 26, a father of two. “I heard bullets being shot into the air.”

“Cars were coming with police,” Mr. Tushabe said, sitting among the ruins of his old home. “They headed straight to the houses. They took our plates, cups, mattresses, bed, pillows. Then we saw them getting a matchbox out of their pockets.”

“But in this case, the government and the company said the settlers were illegal and evicted for a good cause: to protect the environment and help fight global warming,” reports the New York Times.

An Oxfam report documents how the British outfit has worked with the Ugandan government to forcibly expel over 20,000 people from their homes using terror and violence as part of a lucrative scramble for arable land that can be used to satisfy the multi-billion dollar carbon trading ponzi scheme, which is worth $1.8 million a year to the company.

“I no longer own any land. It’s impossible to feed my children – they have suffered so much. Some days all they eat is porridge from maize flour. When people can’t eat well their bodies become weak – there have been lots of cases of malaria and diarrhoea. Some days we don’t eat anything at all,” said former farmer Francis Longoli, whose land was stolen by New Forests.

As we have previously documented, the manufactured threat of man-made global warming is being used as a tool of neo-colonialism in the third world, not only through the seizure of land and infrastructure, thereby preventing poor nations from using their resources to develop, but by literally starving poverty-stricken people to death.

Climate change alarmism and implementation of global warming policies is a crime of the highest nature, because it is already having a genocidal impact in countries like Haiti, where the doubling of food prices is resulting in a substantial increase in starvation, poverty and death, with the population being forced to live on mud pies.

Read the rest of Watson’s article here.

And here’s the extra surprise – those energy-saving bulbs that used to cost next to nothing have been going up and up in price and this is set to continue:

The sales director of Sylvania, one of Europe’s largest bulb-makers, told his customers that China’s near-monopoly over the key raw materials lay behind the increase.

So we are being held to ransom both by the European Union and the Chinese.

In 2008 I wrote a post entitled, EU to ban traditional light bulbs, but at what cost to health and the environment?

We are being forced to adopt these light bulbs which contain hazardous materials and cause discomfort to people with various conditions. Although, they aren’t forcing me, because I have a stockpile and will be buying more. People are still selling them on ebay. I bought some 100W bulbs in a local shop a few weeks ago.

Resistance is not futile.

Up yours, EU!

AgroBiotechnology at China Agricultural University, confirmed that the genetically modified herd’s milk “contains the characteristics of human milk.”

Li added that the cow-human milk “tastes stronger than normal milk” and explained that:

“In ancient China, only the emperor and the empress could drink human milk throughout their lives, which was believed to be the height of opulence. Why not make that kind of milk more available for ordinary people?”

Here’s why not (from the same article):

However, this development should be understood in the light of China’s recent scares over melamine-tainted baby milk. The national scandal that followed the sickening of nearly 300,000 infants fed the tainted milk powder prompted an ongoing discussion about the country’s declining breast-feeding rates, which, in turn, has been blamed on everything from aggressive marketing by formula producers, migrant working patterns, and the rise of body image concerns.

I absolutely refuse to knowingly consume anything genetically modified never mind from a country that cannot even make a tin opener which doesn’t fall to pieces within a fortnight. I now buy those traditional ones, which are made in England and cost just over a pound (they were 99p here until recently). They are simple, safe and fit for purpose. Just like normal cow’s milk, really.

Still, in a country where up to 90 percent of adults are lactose intolerant, genetically modifying cows to produce human breast milk seems like an unnecessarily complicated solution to a problem that could instead be tackled through greater support for and awareness of the benefits of breast-feeding itself, not to mention rigorous enforcement of China’s new food safety laws.

This means they are intending to export the milk to an unsuspecting world that also buys their tin openers by the million.

I forgot about Earth Hour at the weekend – sixty minutes of self-imposed domestic darkness where you risk tripping over something and breaking your neck, for absolutely no other reason than to feel good that you are “environmentally aware.” But if you went along with it, you’re not! I meant to switch on all the lights to protest against the climate change scam, which, apart from everything else rotten about it, diverts the public’s attention away from the real environmental issues – ones which we could actually do something about.

It turns out that the prize for the country who took Earth Hour most seriously goes to North Korea. This satellite photo shows how well they did:

The one spot of light we can see is in the capital Pyongyang. Someone must have left the landing light on and spoiled it all. I would not like to be that person.

You probably guessed that North Korea always looks like this, except when there is a power cut in Pyongyang, then the place looks as lively from space as Antarctica out of season.

Remember kids, this is where socialism ultimately leads. Everyone is equal – equally dirt poor. Except for the Dear Leader – Kim Jong Il in this case – who owns the country’s only light bulb.

Something the North Koreans probably don’t have to worry about is Facebook Depression in teens,

But there are unique aspects of Facebook that can make it a particularly tough social landscape to navigate for kids already dealing with poor self-esteem…

With in-your-face friends’ tallies, status updates and photos of happy-looking people having great times, Facebook pages can make some kids feel even worse if they think they don’t measure up.

You can put in a “friend request” to most Facebookers whether you know them or not, and nearly all will click “accept,” so if you really wanted, you could have as many “friends” as Facebook allows (is it 5,000?). “Status updates” are often drivel anyway, so just write your own drivel and problem solved. Or don’t write anything – even better.

It gives Big Pharma the opportunity to come to the rescue with a “cure.” Perhaps something like the “chemical cosh” drugs for shyness. And the “patients” might be referred to as Facebook cases. (Yeah, that is a bad one.)

But for a constant stream of utter insanity, you need look no further than the EU, who want to ban cars from city centres by 2050.

The European Commission on Monday unveiled a “single European transport area” aimed at enforcing “a profound shift in transport patterns for passengers” by 2050.

The plan also envisages an end to cheap holiday flights from Britain to southern Europe with a target that over 50 per cent of all journeys above 186 miles should be by rail.

Top of the EU’s list to cut climate change emissions is a target of “zero” for the number of petrol and diesel-driven cars and lorries in the EU’s future cities.

It’s our old friend Climate Change again. If we keep going like this, we too will be living the good life like they do in North Korea.

Siim Kallas, the EU transport commission, insisted that Brussels directives and new taxation of fuel would be used to force people out of their cars and onto “alternative” means of transport.

“That means no more conventionally fuelled cars in our city centres,” he said. “Action will follow, legislation, real action to change behaviour.”

The Association of British Drivers rejected the proposal to ban cars as economically disastrous and as a “crazy” restriction on mobility.

Turning the West into an economic disaster is the idea! There is no other reason that I can think of for all of this. We are to revert to the Dark Ages in Europe while our industry is transferred to the Far East which doesn’t have these CO2 targets. Can you see what it is yet? It’s de-industrialisation.

It is sheer madness. Lunacy. Off the charts, mind-blowing insanity.

But the worst part is this: they know exactly what they are doing.

Megacities on the move – Planned-opolis from Forum for the Future on Vimeo.

H/T – Andrew Phillips for the satellite picture

It reminded me that I meant to post this video of Johnny Ball on the BBC’s Daily Politics last week. He has noticed that a GCSE Chemistry book is full of climate change propaganda.

He rightly says that the “lunatic energy policies which have been thrust upon us by politicians… are making every child and every family poorer.”

So, rather than filling children’s heads with doom and gloom, he says:

The future for our kids is brighter than we can yet imagine and that’s the message we should be delivering to every child.

If only we didn’t have politicians with other ideas.

Not only do some people not want you to express an opinion which differs from theirs, but they will go out their way to discredit or threaten you any way they can.

Two people who made learning fun for children were Johnny Ball and David Bellamy. Maybe it was their enthusiasm which was contagious. It seems that the current generation of children has been deprived of these two gents because of their lack of enthusiasm for manmade climate change.

On Johnny Ball,

Bloggers have run campaigns stating Mr Ball ‘should not be allowed near children’.

And an imposter has even tried to cancel his booking at a training day for maths teachers in Northampton.

In a sinister twist, websites have also been set up in his name which contain pornographic images.

Mr Ball, a 72-year-old grandfather, believes his career has been destroyed and says his bookings have fallen by 90 per cent since the smear campaign began four years ago. Police are investigating his claims.

And David Bellamy told the Express,

The sad fact is that since I said I didn’t believe human beings caused global warming I’ve not been allowed to make a TV programme.

My absence has been noticed, because wherever I go I meet people who say: “I grew up with you on the television, where are you now?”

It was in 1996 that I criticised wind farms while appearing on Blue Peter and I also had an article published in which I described global warming as poppycock.

Of course, a great deal hangs on the public believing the warmists’ lies. I am old enough to remember the impending new ice age we were all meant to worry about. Quite soon, it was global warming which was the danger. Now that the planet isn’t actually warming, it’s a more general “climate change.” Manmade, of course, so we can be taxed and shepherded.

Fortunately, this latest hoax is also being discredited.

But, still the warmists trudge on with their lies. Sinister corporation, Google, has announced the creation of 21 new “science communication fellows.”

The company says that this is just a first step in its new effort to “foster a more open, transparent and accessible scientific dialogue”.

How “open” can we expect this dialogue to be when Google’s philanthropic wing states on its website,

Our goal is to find engineering solutions to global challenges such as climate change, clean energy and global health.

I know how Google treats people who don’t follow the globalist agenda, so you can trust them on the climate as far as you can throw them. They threw Alex Jones’ websites off of Google News, despite them being among the most popular alternative media sites in existence. They have even removed paid-for advertising which goes against the NWO “ethos”. The Christian Institute had to take legal action to have their pro-life ads reinstated among the array of abortion suppliers’ adverts, which, naturally, Google are happy to make many thousands, maybe millions of pounds from.

Justin Bieber has spoken of his pro-life views to Rolling Stone Magazine, which has been followed by some suggestions that he had no right to an opinion at his age. He’s sixteen, which is several years older than many children who have been deemed old enough to be handed contraception – and given abortions.

US programme “The View” produced some bizarre comments. Co-hosts made Justin Bieber out to be a bad influence on today’s youth with his own personal beliefs about abortion.

It is clear that most of the ladies on “The View” thought that Justin Bieber shouldn’t have been allowed to express his opinion simply because it differs vastly from their own.

What happened to, “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it?”

Well, it’s becoming more like, “I disapprove of what you say, so shut up or I’ll kill YOU!”

I am not referring specifically to militant islamists this time, but to militant homosexuals and their supporters. The headline reads,

Homosexual supporters in Britain call for killing of newspaper writer who criticized homosexual lessons targeting 4-year-olds!

This article about Melanie Phillips from across the Pond begins,

The horror stories that we hear in Britain and other parts of Europe regarding the militant push behind the cultural breakdown of society, particularly regarding the homosexual agenda, are frightening. And it often happens here before too long.  This may be a glimpse into our not-too-distant future. Groups like ours are here to help you fight back before it’s too late.

And we do need to fight back against this tide of insanity which threatens to engulf us at any moment. I was myself embroiled in a bizarre argument on equality minister Lynne Featherstone’s facebook page last week. On the subject of so-called gay marriage, I simply stated the plain and precious fact that,

Marriage = one man + one woman. It has ALWAYS been that way!!

Oh dear. What did I do? I gave the definition of a word – its proper meaning and not from the Newspeak dictionary. What an obvious thought crime. Like the cigars being airbrushed out of Tom and Jerry cartoons and “nigger” being erased from Huckleberry Finn, everything and anything can and will be changed to conform.

I didn’t receive a death threat on Facebook, but a most fanatical (and clearly troubled) man called Conal Stewart (oddly, one letter away from being an anagram of my name), had a field day in being abusive and illogical in equal measure. We had crossed swords once before, and his first words this time were,

More small minded twisted evil clap trap from the nazi.

Here are some more nuggets:

Stop the moralising and keep your vile opinions to yourself you nazi scumbag.

Listen Nazi, you have no right to decide how others should live their lives and who they should marry or sleep with. It is, quite frankly, none of your business you sicko.

Then he must have realised that he has no argument – just silly name-calling and other abuse, so decides I must be silenced altogether,

I’ve reported all your posts Stewart, you can’t get away with homophobia and intolerance.

I suggested he takes a good look at his posts as I don’t think I’ve come across anyone less tolerant.

A couple of others, who disagreed with me, but still recognised I have a right to my own opinion, also came under fire from Conal. He says to Tim Jones,

YOu need to familiarise …yourself with some of Stewart ’s activities.and his links. He’s a neo-nazi and make no mistake.

You cannot debate with someone like this. He is the product of decades of being given his own way, like a spoiled child who has never been denied anything and when he is finally told, “No,” it won’t compute.

The hacker group Anonymous has issued a warning against world-famous homophobes and islamophobes Westboro Baptist Church. How is this for illogical reasoning:

It recently crashed a number of Egyptian government websites in support of pro-democracy protests.

It has also attacked Paypal and Amazon for clamping down on whistle blowers Wikileaks.

Okay, so they are defenders of free speech. It means a great deal to them. Oh, but wait a minute…

Now hacker group Anonymous has taken aim at the controversial Westboro Baptist Church, saying it will shut down its website unless it stops its public protests.

So, some public protests are more equal than others, on the say-so of some unelected, pizza-faced hackers.

Don’t get me wrong, I think this church brings shame on real Christians, but this just makes me wonder who is really behind Anonymous.

There are too many instances of people being silenced to mention. From the people in the City who have been forbidden from promoting withdrawal from the EU to a teacher’s dismissal for offering to pray for a sick pupil to Dr Kelly being murdered for exposing government lies.

Even telling a joke can cost you your job or land you in court these days.

Where will it all end?

Or alternatively, what can be done to reverse the tyranny?

“Sobers” left this comment,

Am I not right in thinking that the BBC pension fund has investments in green technologies that would lose money if AGW were to be discredited?

They’re hardly going to push the claims of people who, if correct, would reduce the value of their pensions now are they?

I’m sure the main reason is that the State Broadcaster issues state propaganda, which nowadays heavily involves trying to make us believe in the CO2 scam. You can make your own mind up on the pensions. Here is the list of BBC Pensions’ top equity investments. Interestingly (or not?) two of the top six corporations, Royal Dutch Shell and Vodaphone, are “partners” (the new word for companies who give their customers’ money away to improve the public’s perception of them regarding the latest must-be-involved-in “causes”) in Forum for the Future.

Which brings me nicely to another topic on Alex’s show: Forum for the Future’s scenarios for sustainable living in the year 2040. You can watch the four videos here, but they paint similar pictures of a purportedly sustainable society, only made possible by tightly controlling and impoverishing the population. This one seems to have captured nearly all the attention: Planned-opolis…

This video was made with taxpayers’ money as well as corporate funding – one of the foundation corporate partners being Vodaphone. I wonder what it is about a future dystopia which so attracts telecommunications corporations. Those brave eco-warriors at 10:10 get O2’s money. Their other three major sponsors, Eaga, Kyocera and Sony, have all distanced themselves from the group after their “No Pressure” Splatter-gate video nasty was released in the Autumn.

O2 are still keen. Maybe because when our cities become prison grids, we’ll need to use their services more, as the videos suggest. For example, when only the rich have cars and there is little or no public transport, we’ll be meeting virtually and schoolchildren will stay at home and be taught via the internet.

It would be easy to brush this animation off as just a scenario and not to be taken too seriously, but as I wrote about a few weeks ago when highlighting the Optimum Population Trust’s campaign for a huge reduction in the UK’s population, Forum for the Future offers students the chance to turn their environmental dreams into our common nightmare,

Since 1996 our Masters in Leadership for Sustainable Development has been training the sustainability leaders of the future. Last year we celebrated the graduation of our 165th student, and many graduates are already making their mark as think-tank directors and government advisers.

Anyone who has studied the area of think-tanks and government advisory bodies soon realises that these tiny cabals making their plans in private have far more sway over government policy than public opinion and even backbench MPs’ wishes.

Different colour, same idea

Paul Joseph Watson writes about the coming tyranny.

People who resist the state controlling every aspect of their existence will be forced to live in squalid ghettos while the rest of the population will be tightly controlled in high-tech prison cities – that’s the future envisaged by eco-fascists who are exploiting the contrived global warming fraud to openly flaunt their plan for the total enslavement of mankind.

The threat posed by the kind of scenario being promoted by Forum for the Future, the group responsible for the chilling video below, cannot be emphasized enough. The dictatorial hellhole of 2040, where cars will be banned, meat rationed, farming completely abolished and overtaken by the state, behavior catalogued on “calorie cards,” and careers ordained by the government, is the ultimate goal of the control freaks who have seized the reigns of the environmental movement.

Nearly every aspect of the policies undertaken by the global dictatorship that runs the “planned-opolis” depicted in the video are lifted wholesale from historical tyrannies.

- The state completely taking over the means of food production and farming. This is a throwback to the Soviet system of collectivized farming, where Stalin organized land and labor into large-scale collective farms. Farmers who resisted the state taking over their farms were arrested and sent to Siberian gulags. As a result of the mass seizure of property and the disruption that collective farming brought to food production, upwards of 3 million people died from starvation from 1932-33 alone. A similar system imposed in Maoist China under the “Great Leap Forward” led to the Great Chinese Famine and the starvation of at least 36 million people.

You can read the rest here.

It is all about our enslavement: thousands of new laws; the climate change scam; the gun ban; the smoking ban; the dumbing down; the promotion of promiscuity; political correctness.

Like those videos show, though, the elite will be exempt from the trouble of being impoverished and imprisoned in cities. Al Gore has done very well out of the climate scam. Very well indeed.

In Planned-opolis, you can have meat on your birthday, if you can afford it, otherwise “pea and potato pie” is about the best you can hope for.

Unless you’re Al Gore.

But I don’t intend to live in Planned-opolis either, even if I am still around.

I am weighing up my options. How do you intend to avoid it (and the only alternative offered: the ghetto)?

Two MSPs have given these well known “ecofascists” their time and attention – and a conference in the Scottish Parliament. Unsurprisingly, Greenie Patrick Harvie is one. The other is the SNP’s Dr Ian McKee.

One campaigns for homosexual and environmental issues and the other is a retired medical doctor and Deputy Convener of the End of Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill Committee.

They both think a lot of people need to be wiped off the earth.

That’s what I love about “democracy” – you have the chance to vote for such lovely, lovely people.

The radical group is urging First Minister Alex Salmond to launch a Government campaign to curb family size, using the slogan “two’s plenty”.

OPT is calling for Scotland’s population to be cut by a quarter.

Dr McKee, whose wife organised the Holyrood conference, insisted: “The world has finite resources and we can’t go on growing at the current rate. This is a taboo subject for politicians but I think it is something the Scottish Parliament should be discussing.”

I guess getting rid of people to satisfy Gaia is still kind of taboo, but the media and state “education” have made so many other taboos appear normal, like abortion, homosexual acts and increasingly, Dr McKee’s area of interest, bumping off old and sick people, that it’s probably just a matter of time before sacrificing live infants to appease the gods of nature is once again seen as acceptable.

[Dr McKee] added: “I think the Government could encourage families to have less children.

“There is a lot of societal pressure to have children. I think it seems very sensible to put forward the case that people should consider carefully limiting the size of their family.”

Either the man is stupid or, em, no, he is stupid. The fact is that Europeans and North Americans aren’t even having enough children to sustain the population. “Family Planning” has, for decades now, been extremely successful in convincing the public that they only need two children. Feminism has convinced millions of women that they should be separated from their one or two children at an early age to go out to work.

That part of the agenda has already been carried out: mission accomplished for the eugenicists.

[T]he OPT believes Scotland and Britain must do their part to stabilise the world’s population, which could rise to more than nine billion within 40 years. They want the UK population to fall to as low as 30 million, with Scotland playing its part in the reduction.

Can you imagine what needs to happen to achieve this? And these people have been allowed to hold a conference in Parliament.

On immigration, the OPT believes there should be a zero cap on net immigration, meaning numbers would be strictly limited to replace those leaving the country to live elsewhere.

In order to halve the UK population with no net migration, a strict one child policy over decades would be required, like in China. Here too would be a land of forced abortions and sterilisations.

Look who some of the patrons of the Optimum Population Trust are…

Sir David Attenborough OM CH CVO CBE – the naturalist we grew up to love and trust.

Dr Jane Goodall DBE, Founder of the Jane Goodall Institute, and UN Messenger of Peace. (Yes, eugenics is peace!)

Susan Hampshire OBE (remember her?), Actress and population campaigner.

Professor Aubrey Manning OBE, President of the Wildlife Trusts and Emeritus Professor of Natural History, University of Edinburgh – another naturalist who would rather cuddle a dung beetle than a human.

Jonathon Porritt CBE – of course. Another friendly face who would rather you were dead and buried. Or is cremation more environmentally-friendly (if you extract the mercury fillings first, obviously)?

Sir Crispin Tickell GCMG KCVO, Chancellor of Kent University, Director of the Policy Foresight Programme at the James Martin Institute, and former UK Permanent Representative on the United Nations Security Council.

After I posted those Alan Watt videos on eugenics, Frank Davis pondered upon the likelihood of major world events being predetermined by a global elite, and largely decided against it.

If you look at those involved with the OPT, you can get a glimpse into how things work. Alan Watt explained that he had come to the conclusion that there had to be an elite leading the world because “the big players” like Henry Kissinger, the Huxleys and Lord Bertrand Russell belonged to the same institutions and history had panned out according to what they had called for in their writings.

This little OPT humanity-hating cabal consists of everyone they need to change the UK’s attitudes and laws. They have the nation’s most recognisable authority on the earth – a broadcaster who receives almost unrivalled respect. They have two UN representatives, and of course the UN supports China’s one-child policy. They have scientists and professors who can talk up the agenda to their naive university students and their equally naive colleagues. They will write for major newspapers about why we need a one-child policy to save the earth.

And notice how the majority of patrons have been “honoured” with British Empire medals. One of these is Sara Parkin OBE, who is “Founder Director and Trustee of Forum for the Future, Chair of the Richard Sandbrook Trust, Board member of the European Training Foundation“.

The ETF is the EU agency which supports education and training in countries surrounding the EU. Eugenics is a global agenda, not just for us lucky ones in the EU.

Forum for the Future is also concerned with “global challenges” like climate change and population growth. Look how they are getting their agenda across,

Since 1996 our Masters in Leadership for Sustainable Development has been training the sustainability leaders of the future. Last year we celebrated the graduation of our 165th student, and many graduates are already making their mark as think-tank directors and government advisers.

Scared enough yet? This is how they do it. They use the mass media; they train the young to be “leaders”; they are involved with their fellow eugenicists at the UN.

That Scotsman article ends with this,

A recent paper by the OPT claimed that if couples had two children instead of three they could cut their family’s carbon dioxide output by the equivalent of 620 return flights a year between London and New York.

That’s what children are to these monsters: a waste of air. Useless eaters. Parasites.

But they are the parasites, attaching themselves to every broadcaster, school, government department, and everywhere else they can, to promote their sickness and kill off sane and measured debate.

This is why it doesn’t matter which main party you vote for – the politicians aren’t in charge.

I received an email from Sony yesterday which ended, ...we have taken the decision to disassociate ourselves from 10:10 at this time. This just leaves O2 to reply to me. There has been a brief discussion on the O2 forum, starting off with this from “alun1954,”

I am appauled at o2’s involvement in the 10:10 campaign’s mini movie entitled ‘No Pressure’. This movie is scurrulous and pupports anyone with a view contrary to that of certain environmentalists as a lazy, shiftless and surly thicko guilty of heresy against what has become a religious orthodoxy.

I happen to be an individual who rationally and calmly questions both the science underlying so called ‘Catastrophic Climate Change’ and the remedies proposed by those who support it. I fear that billions of our hard earned tax money will be squandered on initiatives which will not only be costly, but will be of no positive impact whatsoever. As a loyal o2 customer, am I to take it, by o2’s support of this film, that your view of me and others like me is as represented in the video?

Well, that being the implication of your support of this propaganda, I would respond by telling you that I am grossly insulted and will be looking for another provider at my next contract renewal point.

According to “sheepdog,” the moderators previously deleted a similar topic. It’s all right for phone companies to constantly hassle us with sales calls, but our opinions on things that matter to us don’t seem to matter to them.

Someone called markle speaks for the planet (or thinks he does) by writing,

Not one credible scientific body of international standing has a position that categorically states that climate change is not caused by human actions.

Strange that this has just happened,

Britain’s leading scientific institution has been forced to rewrite its guide to climate change and admit that there is greater uncertainty about future temperature increases than it had previously suggested.

The Royal Society is publishing a new document today after a rebellion by more than 40 of its fellows who questioned mankind’s contribution to rising temperatures.

Site administrator Paul wrote,

I’d like to clarify O2’s involvement with 10:10.

Good, because nobody’s replying to my email.

Along with 100,000 members of the public, leading businesses, schools and universities, local authorities and NHS Trusts, we support the aims of the 10:10 campaign but they are an independent organisation – we don’t ask to see their adverts before they run and were not involved in the making of the ‘No Pressure’ video.

We acknowledge our responsibility to the environment and are committed to reducing our carbon emissions both as an organisation and in society as a whole.

Hope this helps.

Er, no. This translates as “we’re continuing to support these fascists because CO2 is bad and the video’s not our fault and we crave the publicity of being seen to be serious about the environment whether we’re doing any good or not.”

Vidl does the right thing to my mind,

I, for one, along with friends and colleagues who are disgusted with this “if you don’t believe us you will die” facism, have/are cancelling O2 contracts (my new SIM arrived this am). I will not support O2 whilst O2 “sponsors” 10:10.

F Fitzpatrick wrote yesterday at 3:43 pm,

I’ve been a O2 Ireland customer for 9 years. I will be switching to another provider in 3 days if their logo is still on the 10:10 website. It’s likely they won’t have read my email by then.

Sounds good. They have until 3:43pm on Friday to avoid being the latest on my boycott list. Their delay already sees them on the “best avoided if possible” list. He continues,

I would advise others thinking of moving their business away from O2 to research TESCO mobile as I believe their service is also operated by O2.

If so – and if sense does not prevail – I will be boycotting TESCO supermarkets too.

Tesco’s have been on my boycott list since 2005 for several reasons.

Your time is short before you join them, O2. As “Pinus” says,

Ditch 10:10 O2, you are not doing yourselves any favours.

Because people will think you approve of radical groups making videos showing human beings being culled.

I guess if it was seals, they would have acted immediately to protect their brand image.

Other bloggers have reacted with understandable concern to this propaganda video produced by 10:10 where children and adults who refuse to go along with their agenda to reduce their carbon emissions by ten percent are blown to bloody pieces at the press of a button.

The video was swiftly removed from the 10:10 website after complaints, but multiple copies are available elsewhere online. The pressure group issued a half-hearted apology which included this:

With climate change becoming increasingly threatening, and decreasingly talked about in the media, we wanted to find a way to bring this critical issue back into the headlines whilst making people laugh. We were therefore delighted when Britain’s leading comedy writer, Richard Curtis – writer of Blackadder, Four Weddings, Notting Hill and many others – agreed to write a short film for the 10:10 campaign. Many people found the resulting film extremely funny, but unfortunately some didn’t and we sincerely apologise to anybody we have offended.

I find a bit of black humour as funny as the next man, but not when it has come from people who consider humanity to be problematic. Then it becomes sinister.

Judging by the hundreds of comments left under the “apology”, very few people indeed found this short film funny.

Here is a selection of typical reactions:

archduke 02 October:

thank you ever so much for FINALLY showing the true face of eco fascism.

may this video spread ever further on the internet.

the fact of the matter is – some folks on your side “found it funny”

and that says it all.

Smack4102 October,

Throughout history there have been various groups who find persecution of dissenting minorities quite hysterical.

Global warming fanatics you have become what you hate.

Facebook User02 October,

This film reveals the true face of the environmentalist movement, and it is vile. I sincerely hope that charges are brought against 10:10 for the promulgation of hate speech.

Gerry02 October,

10:10 seems to have just the same message as 7/7, the only difference being the magnitude.

I shall boycott O2, Kyocera, Sony, Eaga and the rest of your sponsors and I shall write to my MP asking that all your taxpayer funding should be scrapped in order to reduce the deficit.

Seph02 October,

Complain to 10:10’s sponsors here:

pressoffice@o2.com
kyoceramita@kyoceramita.co.uk
rik.kendall@eaga.com
Lucie.speciale@eu.sony.com

Facebook User02 October

This winter, I will harvest my deer with my 14 year old son. We will demonstrate more respect for nature, the animals and the environment than you have demonstrated with this disgusting message.

For a bunch of people who consider themselves intellectuals, and value tolerance, you reveal yourselves to be social darwinist elitists, incapable of legitimate discussion.

Jay Christianson02 October,

Oh, *tee hee* no pressure. Let’s just blow kids up in the most graphic and despicable way. “Climate change” (happens every season y’all) is much more serious than depicting murder. This really shows your colors. And you folks say you just, “missed the mark.” Reprehensible, irresponsible. You completely sealed the deal in my mind that you folks don’t know what the hell you’re talking about.

stephen lane02 October.

“The great masses of the people will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one”
Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf)

Facebook User02 October,

If a climate sceptic organisation had put up a video where anyone who disagreed with them was blown up I seriously doubt you would have called it ‘extremely funny’.

CarbonDioxideIsPlantFood02 October,

More eco-fascist propaganda. When will you people stop trying to brainwash others into subscribing to your quasi-religious beliefs? This has gone from being a middle-class guilt trip to an incitement to commit violence against those who don’t agree with your fantasies.

Richard Heyes02 October,

As a teacher myself i am totally shocked that you could think children would not be deeply affected by this, adults can see the reality and stupidity of it, but kids are not so discerning! Sometimes i ask for a show of hands in class who believes climate change is man made, i have never seen more than 50% of hands up. Do you want to blow up 50% of the country’s children?

alex02 October,

you are the worst kind of fascists, i’ve come across – not even neo-nazis here in germany delve in this kind of violent extermination lust.

i pray that you will meet the same kind of end in your bunker as hitler.

Tim McNabb02 October,

That was the most disturbing thing I have seen in decades. I am a father and grandfather, and to watch a schoolmarm push a button ending the lives of children, even in jest, demonstrates a level of moral depravity I cannot quite wrap my arms around.

Paul Oakley01 October,

Your science is flawed and your bullying is inexcusable.

Some of the warmists were also disgusted and ashamed at the propaganda…

Chris Merrick02 October,

One of the most despicable things I have seen for a very long time. Yes, climate change is a real problem, but you really need to look into your hearts and wonder if you have lost touch with normal humanity.

Nick Brown02 October,

Brilliant. The deniers are generally to the right of Genghis Khan, but you’ve managed to make even that bunch of swivel-eyed loons look like sweet, reasonable people, by suggesting in entirely unambiguous terms that anyone who doesn’t want to cut their footprint by 10% should be killed.

Mary Estelle Owens3:01 am,

You really screwed things up for those of us who aren’t terrorists. Thank you for being stupid, now all the deniers think we are all crazy and stupid like those of you that participated in making this film, you bunch of freaks.

However, even the diehard Gaia worshipper still doesn’t get it. Presumably, Paul is one of the many people who found the film extremely funny.

Paul02 October,

If it annoys the minority of skeptic nutters that can be bothered to comment here. Then lets put it back up. I can’t think of a better group of people to wind up.

Poor Paul is so into his religion that he doesn’t see that almost every comment is a negative one. But even the believers who disagree with this particular piece of sick propaganda (which even Goebbels would probably have been embarrassed by) feel the need to be disrespectful to the many who are sceptical.  The usual names are trotted out: deniers, swivel-eyed loons and the all-time favourite, nutters. Sensible debate and even original insults are obviously way beyond their capabilities. They likely have no idea at all about the science. They just believe.

They just believe, because as Cranmer wrote last year, Environmentalism is the new Religion of Peace.

Mr Nicholson contends that, while Grainger [his employers] preached the Green gospel, the firm’s executives would turn up at meetings in ‘some of the most highly polluting cars on the road’. He was therefore at odds with his employer, and believes he was persecuted for his beliefs.

His solicitor, Shah Qureshi, said: “Essentially what the judgment says is that a belief in man-made climate change and the alleged resulting moral imperative is capable of being a philosophical belief and is therefore protected by the 2003 religion or belief regulations.”

Whatever the truth about climate change, the “leaders of the free world” with the help of their obliging attack dogs are removing our freedoms and taxing us more in the name of saving the planet. To further the agenda of global governance, various international agencies will be given the authority to tax us directly and dictate policy to our government. The invertebrates recently elected to serve us will of course genuflect before the green goddess and rubber-stamp the globalist policies designed to enslave and impoverish believer and denier alike. For example, the UK is likely to be fined billions of pounds a year to make reparations to developing countries for the damage our industrialised society has allegedly caused them.

The science will not matter; this is now about religion and the infidel denier will be forced to comply. The believer will sacrifice everything for Gaia and willingly pay his tithes to her apostles in the UN as they dream up ever more devious ways to de-industrialise our society.

The time might even come when Gaia has enough followers that the 10:10 video will be considered a documentary. Unless we act. And never let the world forget this sick piece of propaganda.

Ed Miliband is "ready to lead"

Ed Miliband made his maiden speech to Conference yesterday as new Labour leader. Not “New” Labour leader, i.e. not new New Labour leader, just new Labour leader.

This is very important, because New Labour is dead. This Party is no more; it has ceased to be, etc…

But Mr Miliband is not a Norwegian Blue pining for the fjords. He is Red Ed pining to see his “new generation” of socialists transform Britain into a Mecca of equality.

Hey, wait. Isn’t this what New Labour was supposed to be about? But instead, the gap between rich and poor widened – and the coffers of the Blairs and Kinnocks grew exponentially.

That’s socialism the world over, though: the leaders promise equality, but make sure they themselves are far more equal than those who voted for them. But still they get voted back in. Voters still believe, “Oh, we’re sorry about the past, we’ll do things better next time because we care so much about equality and peace and reducing crime and improving education and health….”

Tom Harris insists that New Labour was much more than a PR gimmick,

But if, like me and many others, you believe New Labour is an indispensable political philosophy which embraces Labour as the party of aspiration, and not just as the party of the dispossessed, then New Labour – however it’s described, labelled and marketed – is here to stay.

His suggestion that Labour is the party of aspiration inspired some comments. This was mine (which wasn’t approved, even though I was polite and said hello),

Hello Tom,

I’m obviously not the only one almost to have choked as I read, “The party of aspiration.”

Those who genuinely do aspire to do something with their lives aren’t likely to vote Labour (if they have any sense).

So, what are Labour voters aspiring to, I wonder?

Being the fourth generation in their family never to work?

Being able to get a job on the minimum wage and give their mum £30pw housekeeping?

Scoring the winning goal in the World Cup final?

Do you really imagine, in your wildest dreams, that people who have genuine aspiration want to vote for a party which keeps a huge underclass as pets?

You should have set your alarm clock, Tom; it’s gone waking up time!

Red Ed doesn’t agree with Tom either.

The theme of the speech hinged on his repeated declaration of a “new generation” – one which he said would deliver change to the party and the country, with “different attitudes, different ideas, different ways of doing politics”.

He attempted to draw a line under 13 years of Labour government, admitting the party in power had been wrong to claim it had ended boom and bust, to encourage a culture of debt, to fail to regulate the City and to ignore concerns about immigration, and wrong to go to war in Iraq.

So we can now draw a line under the New Labour junta, can we? The million or so dead in Iraq and Afghanistan. The near bankruptcy of our country. The deliberate re-engineering of our society through mass immigration.

No sane person will ever draw a line under this utter treachery. Not before those responsible pay for their crimes instead of being rewarded with vast fortunes for going on speaking tours.

My last-but-one post detailed the ConDems’ equality chief’s vision of the socialist dystopia of forced equality she wishes to inflict on us. I reckon Miliband Jr could have given pretty much the same speech.

Critics have raised concerns about Mr Miliband’s stance on traditional marriage after he pledged last month to redefine marriage and impose it on society.

Mr Miliband says he is “angry” that there is a free speech law that allows people to express their opposition to homosexual conduct.

He obviously views people being allowed to express an opinion as such a danger that he is prepared to link it to extreme violence,

He wants the law repealed because he claims the protection would make it harder to convict murderers.

If we ever have the misfortune of having this man as Prime Minister, he might just ban us saying or writing a lot of things. This is what events are leading up to.

Ed Miliband’s conversion to the environmental religion is also very worrying indeed. My only contact with him was an extremely brief encounter on Twitter last November at the time of the climate change conference in Copenhagen when he was the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.

Me:

Are you absolutely sure that your facts about ‘climate change’ are correct before promising away billions of pounds?

EM:

yes,at met office today.CO2 concentrations highest for 650,000 years.co2 link to temp. clear, scientific effect

Me:

So wait. It was much warmer in the Middle Ages, with lower CO2. What does this tell us about CO2 and climate change?

EM:

End of conversation. But he doesn’t need to know the answer. He’ll do as he is told. By climate change “scientists” and the EU and UN agencies and fakecharities and transnational corporations and all the usual suspects which have plagued our politics and our country for quite a long time now.

And finally, Ed doesn’t want to be called names anymore, such as Red Ed, Forrest Gump or Wallace. Tough, Ed. A tiny bit of childish fun is all you’ve left us with. Anyway, how else do you expect us to behave after thirteen years of New Labour infantilising us?