As usual, I have dozens of tabs open on Firefox with news stories I was going to write about, but in a way, they don’t merit individual posts. The headlines are enough to make you sick. There is sometimes nothing more that needs to be said, because we all know the score by now. We know that the police don’t care much about catching criminals anymore and the judges don’t consider it their duty to deliver justice.

Moral relativism brings confusion (obviously) and very bad judgments are the natural result. Add to this “Human Rights” legislation and police targets and criminals have never had it so good.

Devon and Cornwall Police didn’t even bother to investigate 30,000 crimes last year.

Up the road in Bristol, Marie Wastlund beat off three thugs who were throttling and kicking a woman, while two policemen sat in their vehicle twenty-five yards away. The Mail reminds us of some of the other pathetic inactions of the boys in blue (or should that be yellow?). Remember the two PCSOs who let a ten year-old boy drown in a pond because they were “not trained” to deal with such an incident? Their (in)action was defended by police chiefs.

Then there are the usual reports of people with decades of unblemished service in their jobs who are sacked after of a non-event. Ronnie Lane was head of the art department in Liverpool’s West Derby School, but the testimony of one unscrupulous individual ended it. He restrained a 15 year-old boy who repeatedly tried to scrunch up another pupil’s work and alleged that the teacher had left nail marks in his arm. The boy told him, “get off or I will stab your eye out.”

It seems that all some children learn at school is their “rights”. It’s bizarre when you consider that by honouring his alleged rights, the teacher has no rights to maintain discipline in his classes and the other pupils have no rights not to have their work ripped to shreds or to learn in a civilised, safe environment.

Meanwhile, another 15 year-old, Tom Clarke from Oxfordshire, was playing with a football in his garden when he accidentally lobbed it over the fence and through a pane of glass in next door’s greenhouse. A patrol car was on the scene half an hour later and the police helicopter was diverted to search for the culprit with thermal imaging. “Officers said the incident was not a formal caution or criminal conviction but would be ‘recorded for future reference’ and could be seen by future employers carrying out an enhanced Criminal Record Bureau check.”

Imagine falling into a coma in 1970 and waking up today, oblivious of how society has changed, then reading the newspapers. What would you make of the burglar who was freed from prison because being locked up breached his family’s human rights or another prisoner who demanded to be a dad and a Justice Secretary so out of touch with reality that he approved the decision to allow him to artificially inseminate his “partner”?

It is now clear that David Cameron’s socialist party is just as determined to give everything away that our forebears worked and fought for as the traitors in the Labour Governments did. The agenda is the same. The behaviour of this new wave of Quislings is only a surprise to those who were naive enough to fall for Cameron’s lies before the election – and they were lies. Blatant and deliberate lies and for that alone he should be stripped of office.

Why do people keep voting for these liars? Do they think that lying is part and parcel of politics and is acceptable? I think they must. Or maybe they are delusional. Perhaps they think that he is going to stop lying any day now and everything will be just dandy when that happens.

This treasonous government is giving away more money to bail out other countries, plans to “drastically” cut carbon emissions which will cut jobs and increasing military union with other countries.

The Daily Mail never disappoints with its scare stories. The latest “research” suggests that drinking too much coffee can produce hallucinations of Bing Crosby. The volunteers were made to listen to “white noise” and told that “there may be parts of the White Christmas song and if you hear it, press the button.”

There wasn’t any Bing, but regardless, the power of suggestion apparently made them hear him crooning. A bit like people think they have heard a “cast-iron” guarantee from David Cameron when it is really just white noise (propelled by hot air).

But how long, I wonder, until coffee addiction is used as an excuse to avoid being punished for a serious crime?

“M’lud, after drinking five cups of coffee and playing with the dial on his radio, my client heard Bing Crosby telling him to kill the victim…”

“Case dismissed.”

And as always, we are to be afraid of the terrorists – this time, poisoning our food. The warning comes from the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure [CPNI].

That’s a new one on me. But the terrorists are already poisoning us with aspartame and GMO, it’s just that they are known as manufacturers and scientists.

But let’s all be scared of al-CIAda while we eat our delicious cancer-causing food.

If I do give up blogging, just read this post every day. The current news will just be the same, or even more unsettling and bizarre.

But I will soldier on. I believe that more and more people are waking up to how the world really works, and this awakening is something I want to be part of, so expect continued blogging, God willing.

My goodness, I must be getting old. These two coppers look like they’re in sixth form. And they were polite (well, Charlie was the only one without a video camera!).

Recent videos I have seen seem to suggest that the police’s hubris has reached the stage where proper procedure is no longer deemed necessary. Charlie didn’t even have his rights read to him. I guess because he didn’t have any.

The copper who does all the talking (Ashley Bennett) admits that he doesn’t mind obeying orders. Silkie shows a lot of compassion, especially under the circumstances.

And when did police officers stop calling the public “sir” and “madam”. Was it at the same time the shirts and ties made way for paramilitary-style uniforms?

The police were our servants; now we are the slaves?

If you don’t watch the whole video, be sure to fast forward to 12:25. Charlie goes out to the police van and is locked in a cage. They probably have to give the police dogs more room by law! This is absolutely outrageous. This is training us to toe the line. If he was so dangerous he had to be locked up like an animal, they wouldn’t have sent two boys to pick him up.

They would have done this instead.

Max Farquar found the video, also from Friday. Demotix reports:

An alternative to the Royal Wedding called the “Zombie Wedding” was to be held in London’s Soho Square, billed as “a right royal orgy” with “rumpy pumpy and guillotines”.

Professor Chris Knight, Camilla Power and Patrick Macroidan had already been arrested, locked up and had their props seized, on charges of suspicion to cause a breach of the peace and public nuisance.

At the start, there were more press and plain clothes police than protestors,

It seemed the square had been double booked with the secret policeman’s ball at one point. I know you’re not supposed to notice them, but most of them do stick out like sore thumbs. The fact they were all wearing luminous green wristbands, and not making that great a job at hiding them, didn’t really help their cause.

In time, a few more zombies did arrive, as did the zombie wedding cake…

A group of about half a dozen or so ‘wedding guests’ were singing “we all live in a fascist regime” to the tune of the Beatles yellow submarine, when a group of six men in hoodies & jeans came storming into the park and grabbed one of the singers from behind. As the detained man was manhandled towards the exit, another group of men charged in to prevent his friends assisting him, with at least two of them ending up on the floor. In all, I think I counted at least fifteen plain clothed, and two uniformed officers involved in the arrest of this one person. No details were forthcoming from the police for the reason of the arrest, but fifteen plus officers to arrest one man in a square surrounded by uniformed officers seemed a tad excessive, if not over dramatic to me.

And again, no ID was given and no rights were read.

I later bumped into an American zombie family, who had also been in Soho Square earlier. American zombie mum said how shocked they had been at the way the Met had conducted their operation, comparing it to something you would have expected in the former Soviet Union, but never expect to see in London.

I would not be surprised if this whole operation to “cleanse” the centre of London of all dissenters was organised in such a way as to train the public what we can expect if we step out of line. It could also have been an exercise to see how much the police could get away with and what the public’s reaction would be.

Here is another video of the “zombies” in Soho Square. This is LGBT anti-cuts group Queer Resistance, who are ordered to leave the area because Royalists would be offended. Lesbilicious reports,

Police arrested a number “zombie flashmob” participants, and prevented others from holding a picnic in Soho Square.

A section 60 cordon was put in place in the centre of London this morning in response to reports that anarchists were “masking up” in Soho Square. The move gave police the power to stop and search anyone in the area.

In a YouTube video uploaded by a protester, police officers can be seen telling unmasked lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans activists dressed as zombies to disperse before they “offend” royalists.

“So the line is because the pro-monarchy people are coming here, you have to make us go,” asks a protester. “Yes,” they are told, before being informed that: “you have four minutes, either you leave or be arrested”.

As I have said before, the highly favoured status homosexuals enjoy will not last forever because they are just being used in social engineering experiments. They are esteemed as trash by the Establishment just like the rest of us.

Le’Belle alleges that police officers consistently misgendered both himself and his companion, a trans woman. He described how a police woman “cupped” his companion’s “genital area” in order to ascertain her genital status before conducting a search.

The pair were questioned and then held in a police cell for three hours before being released without charge. “It was really horrible,” said Le’Belle. “We hadn’t done anything, we weren’t protesting”.

You might still be thinking that this was a one off “special” day and that the “authorities” had a right – duty, even – to clear the city of “undesirables,” even places like Soho Square, which are nowhere near to the wedding route. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t really want to see most of these people in public, dressed as zombies and singing badly, but the world doesn’t revolve according to what I want and it shouldn’t revolve around what the Royal Family or the Government want, when what they want is unfair and unjust. I feel that this has set a very dangerous precedent.

I only use my telly for watching videos (so that I don’t have to fund the BBC), so while most people had already digested the televisual feast that was the Royal Wedding and were relaxing with Britain’s Got Talent, or some other prolefeed, I was watching this video: Taking Liberties.

The film is largely about the erosion of our freedoms under Tony Blair. We see protestors being arrested and prevented from going to their destinations. It seems fairly routine – not just on “special” days.

The film tells us that police have used The Terrorism Act to stop and search 100,000 people – and not one was a terrorist.

The “pre-crime” arrests we see in the videos I have linked to are nothing compared to what Blair would like. Forward to 46:24 and he advocates intervening before birth!

The state kidnapping of babies and children is just one more thing which happens when we lose our rights and the state gets more power than it should have. Not that there aren’t legitimate circumstances for taking children into care, but I am certain that we have gone beyond what is reasonable and decent.

The film covers other important topics like ID cards and the extradition treaty David Blunkett agreed with the USA whereby British people can be packed off to the States even without prima facie evidence. They say, “We want Mr Whoever” and our police are obliged to arrest him and put him on a plane.

And near the end of the film is an interesting piece on a judgment made in the House of Lords. They decided that the police had acted wrongly in turning back the coach-load of protestors en-route to a demonstration (as seen in the first part of the film), even though the courts sided with the police all the way. The House of Lords has protected basic freedoms a number of times when our elected representatives in the Commons voted to take them away.

No wonder the main parties want to change the Lords. They seem to be on the people’s side more often than our elected representatives are.

The film asks who is to blame for the situation we find ourselves in: the Government, the police, the media – or us?

It is “us,” isn’t it?

The EU ban on selling hundreds of over-the-counter herbal remedies has just come into effect. With the pan-European organisations sticking the jackboot in harder and harder, and with a European police force inevitable one day, the time will surely come when protestors, or anyone else, can be arrested and flown to a prison anywhere from Lapland to Cyprus.

In fact, even today, the European Arrest Warrant means you can be whisked away to another country. Michael Turner of Corfe Castle ended up in a Hungarian prison for four months without trial then was thrown out onto the street without an explanation. Apparently there are thousands of people in jails across Europe who have never been charged.

The writing is on the wall. The direction we are going is clear. There will be no mercy. We need to take our country back.

The first thing we can do is not to vote for the traitor parties in this week’s elections.

Whether you agree with Charlie Veitch and the deeds of the Love Police is a matter of choice. Personally, I support his peaceful refusal to obey the State and his ability to upset the natural order imposed by the powers that be.

Amen to that. The “powers that be” now being mostly traitors.

In the comments, TJ Poynton embedded the following video which was uploaded to YouTube yesterday.

Here are the police again, this time arresting an elderly couple who were about to perform some street theatre. It looks as if about twenty officers turned up, in several vehicles.

There’s one naughty word at 2:16 when the old fella (Chris Knight is his name, I think) says, “F*** sake” as he is dragged off. A policeman says, “No swearing sir, come on.”

I have a Christian friend who left the police because of the constant swearing and taking of the Lord’s name in vain by officers.

At 3.48 we see a man being arrested in case he causes a breach of the peace – for being in fancy dress.

A man continually asks the police if he can have Mr Knight’s house keys so he can look after their rabbit while they are being held. Inspector Welch assures him that the rabbit will be looked after, but as the man astutely realises, they probably want to search the house. Perhaps this is the reason he never gets the keys. The Inspector says,

I’m sure we will look after the rabbit. We’re not going to do anything to the rabbit; the rabbit will be looked after, okay?

I would say that they planned to rummage around the house while the couple are locked in the cells.

Oh, and we see that the old woman has been handcuffed.

And all this is happening while Islamists are threatening death and destruction at this time. Do you really think the police or government care about our safety or freedom? They lie about terror threats to try to scare and control us. I mean, come on, they allow the terrorists to live here in the first place. A few mad muslims don’t faze the elite. But ordinary people expressing an opinion they don’t like scares the pants off them.

The stats reveal that this blog gets visits from the police, so if any of you are reading this, please consider what you have become.  Do you think your families can be free while you stamp on the rest of us? Do you think that your children, siblings and parents are being protected from genuine threats while you behave like this? Do you want to be part of a system where you must obey orders no matter how stupid or evil they are?

Think about it.

UPDATE 1.40PM

The Evening Standard reports:

rotesters planning to behead effigies of Prince William, the Queen, Charles and Camilla were arrested last night and held in a south London police station during the wedding.

Police seized a working guillotine as they arrested Chris Knight, 68, head of anti-royal anarchist group The Government of the Dead; his partner Camilla Power, also 68, and Patrick Macroidan, 45, dressed as an executioner, at Knight’s home in Brockley.

They were held for conspiracy to cause a public nuisance and breach of the peace. They claimed they were intending to stage a street theatre event. Sources said they were expected to be released on bail at about 3pm today.

In a separate development, activist Charlie Veitch was held in Cambridgeshire on behalf of the Met, on suspicion of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance and breach of the peace. The privately educated former finance worker was among activists who occupied Fortnum & Mason during last month’s TUC march.

The point stands that while our government condemns other regimes’ crackdowns on protests, our police are rounding up protestors here.

Paul Joseph Watson writes,

Veitch was in contact with police before the arrest, reassuring them that his plans were completely peaceful and merely centered around voicing his free speech, which evidently no longer exists as a human right in the United Kingdom.

This has been evident for a few years now.

TSA man enjoying his work keeping us safe from weirdos

I have just been watching some videos of “pat downs” on children passing through airports in America – being intimately searched in case they are carrying weapons or bombs. They might be Junior al Qaeda, you never know. The TSA (Transportation Security Administration) suspects anyone and everyone.

So, just in case, the kids get to go through naked body scanners which fire out dangerous levels of radiation in order to produce vivid pictures of their entire naked bodies for the people watching on screens to have a good look at.

If the parents refuse to subject their children to the radiation and humiliation, then it’s pat-down time – or it could be pat-down time even despite being irradiated – when, it seems, anything can happen. No body part is out of bounds for the groping hands in latex gloves.

This is all to keep us safe, of course. Well, if groping little children is required to “keep us safe,” count me out. I don’t want to be safe. My hide isn’t worth the price.

There is even a video of a young boy, maybe five years old, being strip-searched. He is naked from the waist up – and it is all being conducted in public view.

Here is a CNN report of the parents of a four year-old disabled boy, en-route to Disney World, being sternly ordered to remove their son’s leg braces so he can walk through security without them – even though they explain that he cannot walk at all without them.

The boy’s father, a policeman, asked to speak to a supervisor, who agreed with the initial decision.

It is a while since I travelled through a British airport, so I don’t know what conditions are like these days. I don’t imagine it is as bad as in the USA, but the US administration could insist on similar “security” measures in our airports where there are flights to the States.

Alex Jones explained on his radio show just a day or two ago why some organisations are full of a mixture of dimwits and really nasty people. It’s because the control freaks – the ones who get off on the power trips – love their job. Normal employees soon leave because it sickens them.

We can see the same sort of tactics in other walks of life. It is clear that the Conservative Party is no longer conservative. At least in the highest echelons. People with traditional, conservative views get deselected or suspended from the party.

Tories today are expected to recreate themselves in the image of Dave. Or face the consequences.

This Tory councillor from Bristol behaved very un-Dave-like when he suggested that role models shouldn’t be sent into schools based on their sexuality. He was heckled in the council chamber and then suspended from his party.

As was the case with the Golliwog Two, Bill and Star Etheridge, it would have been considered that he had brought the party into disrepute. He thought he lived in a free country where his beliefs mattered. He was wrong.

The end result of it all is that, like the people who get jobs with the TSA, the decent ones leave or are forced out and what is left behind is not very pleasant…

Control freak TSA workers humiliate people by touching them up in public, even though they are obviously no danger whatsoever.

Control freak Cameron clones humiliate people by rubbishing their opinions and beliefs, even though they are as conservative as they come.

This strategy of clearing out the decent to make way for the desperate also seems to be happening in our police forces. When policing is no longer so much about banging to rights the local baddies but instead is obsessed with hounding the law-abiding majority in order to “meet targets” then we are bound to end up with our fair share of undesirables who are too cowardly to face real criminals but act really tough when, for example, they use a stinger device to stop a 70 year-old man in his Range Rover (he’s doing no more than 40 MPH) after a minor altercation, and then smash in his window, open the door and drag him out.

The EU Referendum blog listed quite a few other examples of our wonderful British bobbies the other day. The writer left us with this warning,

Just don’t anyone say these are a “few bad apples”. This is a vast barrel of apples. And that’s one of the advantages of being a little bit older. I’ve been around a while, seen things done things. I’ve worked with cops professionally, been on the receiving end – too often. Needed them, far too often. I’ve, watched them, listened to them, studied them, and got some good friends who are ex-cops.

And yes, we know the Courts are just as bad, the CPS doesn’t do its job, and all the rest, and the poor little plods don’t get the back-up they feel they deserve (which is why, of course, they insist on alienating their natural supporters). But even when you take all that into account, you have a police force which is going down the pan. The more honest cops admit it, and I’ve had serving officers tell me much the same.

The BIG question is, though, what are we going to do about it? What CAN we do about it?

We are being herded like cattle – not only physically, but in every sense – to believe and act according to a fairly narrow and inflexible code and to expect to be treated like vermin so we can be more easily controlled.

They are training us to be slaves, which is why they need the “right” people in the jobs. I know plenty of decent, caring, honest, intelligent and conscientious people who are out of work, but they aren’t the “right” people for many of today’s jobs.

The state needs the “right” people to be given authority over us – to bark commands at us and to obey orders without question; the “right” people in education to teach the “right” doctrine; the “right” people in politics who are prepared to commit treason; the “right” people who believe the “science is settled” in any number of areas; the “right” people, who, like the TSA workers who can stay the course, are either low on intellect or keen to exercise the power they have over the bodies of other people – the same kind of sickness which drives rapists and bullies. These are the sort of desired characteristics our elite masters are attracted to. They love people with precious little conscience because they will do as they are told and will love being horrible and getting paid for it!

The elite hates people who have a sound conscience, as can be seen from the outrageous attempts to control them and paint their “dissent” as something unpleasant, like homophobia or religious hatred. It clearly helps them to have certain types of people employed in the CPS who will consider a private conversation about religion on private premises to be a matter for the courts. These people need to either be stupid or else bullies who like the idea of oppressing people they see as easy targets: Christians, in this case.

The government is making thousands of people redundant. You can bet your bottom dollar that they will be keeping the “right” people that they need to herd us in the “right” direction.

This item is simply incredible: Police roadblocks are being set up to catch drivers who are breaking the law – by smoking at the wheel of their company vehicle.

Council wardens and Essex Police will carry out random inspections across the county to look for evidence of illicit cigarette use.

They will even hunt for cigarette butts in the ashtrays and smell the air inside the vehicles in order to clamp down on the outlawed practice.

Whatever you think about smoking, you must surely admit that this is just total tyranny. It is clear that many of these new laws were intended to achieve nothing more than intimidate and inconvenience the law-abiding public.

I could probably link to hundreds of cases of police failing to appear at the scene of real, serious crimes, but frankly, what’s the point? You’ve read them yourselves. Even if the majority of coppers are still decent, this sort of nonsense paints them all as Stasi officers.

Workers were banned from smoking in their company cars as part of the Health Act introduced in 2006.

It’s a New Labour idea, perhaps via the EU. Well, thank goodness the good people of Britain made sure we got a Tory prime minister this time. It sure makes a difference: it’s got worse!

The culprits’ employers will also be informed and also be heavily fined.

One of my “to-do” posts (there are a lot in this category) is about the legislation which is aiding the destruction of British industry. The smoking ban is part of it. Not because smokers take time off to go outside for a smoke – a lengthy exercise if you work on the 45th floor in Canary Wharf in which case you might as well stay outside for a couple – but because they would be more productive sitting at their desks having a smoke, if my last but one post is correct that smoking boosts brain power.

Maybe the smoking ban is the reason journalists are getting worse?!

I spent five years working in an incredibly smoky office and that aspect of the job wasn’t pleasant. There was no ventilation, so by mid afternoon (and depending on who was in the office) the whole place would be filled with layers of smoke with nowhere to go but hang in the air making pretty patterns. But it didn’t have to be like that and it doesn’t have to be the complete opposite today, with a little bit of give and take; a dose of tolerance; a soupçon of common sense.

Of course, there have already been van and truck drivers and also taxi drivers fined for smoking alone in their own vehicles. I see that the madness has also reached Canada:

A police officer saw the 48-year-old trucker driving on a highway in southwestern Ontario with a cigarette in his mouth on Wednesday, and gave him a C$305 ($290) ticket.

In a world increasingly controlled by globalists, we are getting the same laws everywhere. I didn’t realise that some states and territories have made it illegal to smoke in vehicles which are carrying children. The most draconian seems to be in Nova Scotia:

Smoking prohibited in any vehicle carrying anyone under the age of 19.

Fakecharity ASH says,

In 2008 the Department of Health asked for views on whether the Government should do more to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke within private dwellings or vehicles. Around two thirds of respondents said the government should take no further legislative action although fifty-three respondents supported smoking being made illegal in moving cars and several respondents suggested there should be no smoking in cars carrying children.

If they cannot change the law via mob rule, as only “several respondents” suggested there should be “no smoking in cars carrying children,” ASH will no doubt use another tactic to achieve their final solution. Fake second and third-hand smoking data producing unfounded scare stories seems favourite.

I will give the last word to former Lord Provost of Glasgow (and Celtic director), Michael Kelly (he of “Glasgow’s Miles Better” fame) who wrote this on my Facebook page a few days ago:

Despite cuts in public services, a Welsh police force is recruiting not one, but fourteen staff to deal with “LGBT” issues. The BBC reports:

A tranche of police officers are being trained to deal with crimes against people who face discrimination because of their sexual orientation.

Stop there! Is alleged discrimination a matter for the police or lawyers? Why is police time being wasted dealing with folk who go bleating about being called names at work or are the butt of a joke?

Gwent Police have trained 14 officers and support staff as part of its first lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGB&T) liaison service.

Part of? How many bodies do they need?

Assistant Chief Constable Simon Prince said: “It is estimated that one in 12 people in [the] Gwent [force area] classes him or herself as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender which is a significant number of people.

And who estimated this wildly ridiculous figure? The latest Office for National Statistics figures are 1% homosexual and 1/2% bisexual. It is interesting that the BBC article doesn’t quote anyone contending Simon Prince’s outrageous claim.

“If we can encourage greater reporting it will enable us to gain a greater understanding of hate crime and the extent to which people are suffering but also to better enable us to tackle it.”

Any victim of such a hate crime will be offered the assistance of one of the liaison officers alongside the investigating officer.

As an example of how resources are wasted and innocent people hassled, last Spring, Dale Mcalpine, of Workington, was arrested after a conversation with a police community support officer in which he said the Bible calls homosexual conduct a sin.

Mr Mcalpine is a street preacher, but his remarks came in private conversation, including with PCSO Sam Adams, who is homosexual and an LGBT liaison officer. Mr Mcalpine was arrested and locked in a cell for seven hours.

I wonder how fourteen such people will be able to justify their jobs. I can almost imagine them sitting in churches waiting for a minister to say that homosexuality is a sin. When it happens, as it does occasionally, the request will go out for backup – I believe two or three squad cars is not unusual to pick up easy targets and add to the intimidation.

This agenda is no longer about equality. In fact, I don’t believe it ever was. When the law was changed about forty years ago which legalised consensual homosexual acts between two people over 21, there was only one thing bound to happen: society would be corrupted. Society has changed so much that people often joke about homosexuality becoming compulsory. We aren’t there yet, but it is now mandatory to allow people to have homosexual sex on your own premises.

A court case this week saw Peter and Hazelmary Bull from the Chymorvah Hotel in Cornwall accused of refusing a room to two homosexual men. They have been accused of “discrimination” – the magic word, which, when uttered to police, is a far better bet than the Lottery to make some easy money: up to £5,000 in this case.

This is the pair (below) who think it is their right to abuse the owners of a B&B – which is also their home. The Bulls only allow married couples to share beds, so unmarried heterosexual couples are equally not allowed to share a room. Preddy and Hall claim that they had not been made aware of the house rules, but could these two, who are members of Stonewall, have set up the Bulls?

Steven Preddy and Martyn Hall are seeking £5,000

I know a lot of folk don’t yet understand the homosexual agenda. People say that it’s none of their business what others get up to in their own bedroom. But it has gone way past this stage, and now others have a right to do what they want in your bedroom and you aren’t allowed to criticise it, even if you’re talking to people on the street. The agenda is being peddled in schools and national and local government departments. We have now reached dangerous levels of government control.

If anyone thinks that fourteen new LGBT busies in a corner of Wales will produce a balanced and fair system, I think they’ll be disappointed. I cannot imagine that this number of extra staff will achieve much other than more crackdowns on free speech and conscientious objection. I half expect this experiment to be hailed as a great success and “rolled out across the country”.

The Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, has just touted the idea that anti-government demonstrations in London should be banned because resources are being stretched. Or should that be misused?

Look at the state of this country today. Because we haven’t stood up for decent values, the decadence and hedonism is leading to our downfall. Is it too late to turn back?

Dale McAlpine was preaching in the centre of Workington, Cumbria, when he was approached by a PCSO, who told him he was a liaison officer for the local lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) ‘community’. Now, Mr McAlpine had not mentioned homosexuality in his preaching, so I can only assume that the LGBT PCSO was looking for trouble.

This was the conversation:

“He told me he was homosexual,” Mr Mcalpine said.

“I said ‘the Bible says homosexuality is a sin’. He said ‘I’m offended by that and I’m also the LGBT liaison officer within the police’.

“I said ‘it is still a sin’.”

He said three uniformed police officers then appeared and accused him of using homophobic language.

“I’m not homophobic, I don’t hate gays,” Mr Mcalpine said. “Then they said it is against the law to say homosexuality is a sin. I was arrested. It’s crazy isn’t it?”

The Marmalade Sandwich notes that the constable making the arrest says,

“It is against the law. Listen mate, we’re pretty sure. You’re under arrest for a racially aggravated Section 5 Public Order offence.”

Wow. Not just a Section 5 Public Order offence, but a racially aggravated Section 5 Public Order offence.” Oh dear.

Notice, by the way, that Dale McAlpine was aware of Lord Waddington’s amendment (attributing it, in the pressure of the moment, to Lord Carey), and of the meaning of the word ‘homophobia’. The constables involved don’t seem to have been quite as clued up.

See how completely the ‘authorities’ have been made to believe that disapproving of somebody’s sexual behaviour is the same as racism? The homosexual activists jumped onto the racism bandwagon decades ago for this purpose.

You could be mistaken for thinking that the LGBT ‘community’ is now in charge of law and order in the UK. Peter Tatchell defended the preacher’s right to free speech and writes,

Soon after I offered to appear as a defence witness and to argue in court for Mr McAlpine’s acquittal, the Crown Prosecution Service dropped the case. The sudden withdrawal of charges may have been mere coincidence but perhaps not.

No, perhaps the police do whatever someone from the homosexual lobby says. After all, their flag can be seen flying from police stations now and then, like this one a few days ago in Salford, filmed by Richard Carvath…

Can anyone think of any other special interest pressure group the police fly a flag for?

Mr Tatchell continues,

Although clearly homophobic, Mr McAlpine did not express his opinion in a way that was aggressive, threatening or intimidating.

I am surprised and shocked that the CPS allowed the case to proceed at all. The Public Order Act is meant to protect people from harm. Dale McAlpine’s views are misguided and offensive but I see no evidence that they caused harm to anyone.

The problem with this is that aggressive, threatening or intimidating are subjective. Unrepentant sinners will spend eternity in Hell. That’s pretty threatening and intimidating. And Mr Tatchell believes that Mr McAlpine’s views are misguided and offensive, yet a great many people, homosexuals included, think that these words describe his beliefs.

Tatchell also writes,

I urge the Home Secretary, Theresa May, to issue new guidelines, making it clear that the police should not arrest people for expressing prejudiced views in a non-threatening and non-aggressive manner. Prosecutions should only proceed in extreme circumstances. The police should concentrate on tackling serious, harmful crimes, such as racist, homophobic and sexist violence.

Every sentence is loaded. He didn’t need to include the word prejudiced in that sentence. He defended the man’s right to free speech – but only within limits which nobody can be sure about.

If anyone from the police reads this blog, and I know that you do as I see .police.uk in the stats, please note that criticising a person’s lifestyle choice is not illegal, however homosexual acts are what are known as crimes against nature. They used to be actual crimes too until your masters’ brains became fried on political correctness. You have to question why you joined the force if you are prepared in any way to behave like the officers in the video.

The scripture of course refers to Christ’s sacrifice.

But you are not your own in another sense in New Labour’s sick new world. As far as homosexuality is concerned, we are expected to accept it or shut up, even under our own roof! The government/EU expects to override our consciences and get away with it.

A gay couple were turned away from a Berkshire guest house by the owner who said it was “against her convictions” for two men to share a bed.

Michael Black and John Morgan, from Brampton, Cambridgeshire, had booked a double room at the Swiss B&B, Terry’s Lane, in Cookham, for Friday night.

But when they arrived owner Susanne Wilkinson refused to let them stay.

She admitted she did turn the couple away because it was against her policy to accommodate same sex couples.

Her home; her policy. But that no longer means anything today.

The couple have now reported the matter to Thames Valley Police.

And how they must have loved doing it.

Under the Equality Act 2006 it is illegal to discriminate against people on the grounds of sexual orientation.

Ms Wilkinson told the BBC: “They gave me no prior warning and I couldn’t offer them another room as I was fully booked.

“I don’t see why I should change my mind and my beliefs I’ve held for years just because the government should force it on me.

Of course you shouldn’t. A lot of these homosexuals demand to be understood, but go crying to the police about someone else’s beliefs and feelings.

“I am not a hotel, I am a guest house and this is a private house.”

An Englishman’s home is no longer his castle if a pair of men want to share a bed in it.

Mr Black and Mr Morgan were in the village, near Maidenhead, to meet some friends for dinner and to see a local play.

Mr Black told the BBC: “We’re two respectable middle-aged men – John is leader of the Lib Dem group on Huntingdon Town Council.

Respectable? Hell’s teeth.

John is leader of the Lib Dem group. He must be loving the attention. Basking in the wicked discrimination that meant he had to find another bed to share with his boyfriend.

Owner apologised

“This was the first time either of us had experienced homophobia at first hand, despite being aged 56 and 62. We were shocked and embarrassed.

Now hold on. They had never experienced homophobia before at their age? So what is all this public re-education (diversity training) and Stonewall’s infiltration of schools to stamp out ‘homophobic bullying’ all about then?

“Mrs Wilkinson saw us both before we got out of the car and immediately acted in an unwelcoming, cold way, but my boyfriend and I were polite and friendly.

Ah, they’re the good guys, you see.

“She said if we’d told her in advance she would have told us not to come.

But they either didn’t have the decency to explain their situation or wanted to make a big deal out of Mrs Wilkinson’s beliefs and demand she changes her policy as to who she has to stay under her own roof.

“She apologised for turning us away. I asked for a refund of the deposit, which she gave me without quibble.

“We stayed polite and, to be fair, she wasn’t rude or abusive.

Unlike these two, who abused her by reporting her to the police for her beliefs. Sometimes I have to pinch myself that these things are really happening in our country today.

‘Civil matter’

“All she said about her reasons for turning us away was that it went against her convictions for us to stay there.

“We’ve since told a large number of friends and acquaintances and the reaction has consistently been amazement that this should have happened.

That’s because we live in a climate of fear. Many people are scared to nail their colours to the mast – on any subject.

“I’ve reported the matter to Thames Valley Police who have confirmed that they are following it up.”

Of course they are. They have to. No doubt proper, serious crimes cannot be dealt with because the police have to deal with poseurs whose feelings have been hurt.

Thames Valley Police said the call had been logged as a homophobic incident.

Special treatment. Tougher sentences. Equality never was going to be enough for some of them.

A spokeswoman said: “As the people live outside of the force area, we have asked Cambridgeshire Constabulary to speak to the individuals concerned.”

More police time wasted.

A spokesman for Stonewall, which campaigns for equality and justice for lesbians, gay men and bisexuals, said turning someone away on the grounds of sexual orientation was illegal.

Derek Munn, director of public affairs, said: “Stonewall was delighted when the law changed in 2007 so that lesbian and gay couples could go on their holidays like anyone else.

They always could go on holiday. The difference now is that they think they don’t have to respect the people they are staying with.

“In open and shut cases of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation the law’s quite clear – it’s illegal for businesses to turn away gay customers or discriminate against them when providing goods or services, and this can’t be overridden by personal prejudice.”

It is the same old line: personal prejudice.

A sincere belief is not the same as personal prejudice, which suggests malice, which is not the case here.

Unlike the personal prejudice of homosexuals who seek out Christian hoteliers so they can make a show of being refused a double bed for them to fornicate on?

The law must be changed to accommodate people’s conscience.

——————

P.S. Let me remind you that the early homosexual activists knew they would have to destroy the traditional family unit in order to feel fully ‘equal’. And as a strong and free society depends on strong family bonds, they are actually destroying our society. The same is true of the use of pornography and New Labour’s sex ‘education’. By changing the natural bonding rules, those human bonds become weaker – one night stands, homosexual liaisons, single parents – and thus society becomes weaker and collectively we are less able to stand up to the increasing amount of authority which is depriving us of our freedom.

Woof! No messing. He continues,

The Conservative Party has just selected homosexual Matthew Sephton as their candidate for Salford and Eccles.

As a rival [and pro-heterosexual!] candidate I welcome Matthew to the contest for Salford and Eccles.

Matthew’s own blog is heavy with pro homosexual pervert content: see here, here and here….

I very much doubt that the vast majority of the Salford and Eccles electorate will want to be represented by a prominent homosexual activist – and one who neither lives nor works in the constituency.

The following day, he received a letter from the local constabulary,

“Richard Carvath

We have received a complaint today regarding concerns over the content of your blog article dated Monday 7th December 2009.

A reader of your article has made a complaint that the content is offensive and feels strongly enough to report this matter to the police. He wishes for you to be advised over the potential alarm and distress caused by your article. Whilst not taking this at face value and understanding the meaning of language and how it can be misinterpreted, it could be argued that the context of the comments made could be construed to be borderline criminal.

At this stage I feel it would be advisable for you to remove this from your blog thereby preventing misinterpretation.

Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated. …

Regards

PC2401 Jacky Thompson.”

So, the police are now ‘advising’ people to take down blog posts if someone doesn’t like them. Thankfully, Mr. Carvath told them a few home truths.

“Dear PC Thompson,

Thank you for your email.

There is nothing criminal about my blog article and so I have no intention of removing it for the foreseeable future.

Well exactly, but in a dictatorship, truth gets censored.

Homosexuality is a perversion: that is both moral truth and medical fact. Therefore it is quite reasonable for me to refer to a person in whom the perversion of homosexuality is manifest as a homosexual pervert. Let me make it clear that I do not use the term ‘homosexual pervert’ as a pejorative term – derogation is not my motive in using the term; I use the term simply to convey the true nature of what homosexuality is because I believe that the truth matters.

He explains a very important distinction here, and one which seems to escape many people.

I’m aware that you are employed by an organisation [GMP] which is politically in favour of homosexual perversion. I’m aware that GMP celebrates its association with the militant perverts’ organisation Stonewall. I’m aware of the secular humanist socio-political orthodoxy of ‘equality’ and ‘diversity’ which GMP panders to.

Can’t argue with any of that.

My advice to you is to stop being a social engineer trying to suppress free speech and get on with genuine police work.

Hear, hear!

It is not a crime to criticise homosexuality and nor is it a crime to refer to a public gay political activist as a homosexual pervert.

Even if it were a crime I’m a British evangelical Christian so nothing and nobody is going to tell me what I can and can’t say in my own country. As a Christian I speak and act out of love – not hate – so my motive for referring to homosexuality as a perversion is love.

My advice to you is to get on with dealing with real crime like robbery, rape and murder and stop trying to suppress free speech.

Never has there been clearer proof of the vital importance of the Waddington free speech safeguard!

Absolutely.

Most of the replies left on his blog seem to be from angry heterosexuals. Perhaps Mr Carvath’s strength and honesty of language has made folks’ brains go into meltdown. I left this comment myself,

These comments from heterosexuals go to show how well they have been trained by the media.

How has this been achieved? Read the blueprint from the USA.

“The first order of business is desensitization of the American public concerning gays and gay rights.”

“Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and as often as possible. The principle behind this advice is simple: almost any behavior begins to look normal if you are exposed to enough of it at close quarters and among your acquaintances.”

“Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers. In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector. If gays are presented, instead, as a strong and prideful tribe promoting a rigidly nonconformist and deviant lifestyle, they are more likely to be seem as a public menace that justifies resistance and oppression.”

Homosexuals don’t want their lifestyle criticised. Fair enough, I suppose. None of us likes being disagreed with, especially while we are entrenched in sin, but nobody is infallible and beyond criticism. Furthermore, everyone has the right to call a spade a spade. Just like the messages left on Mr Carvath’s blog and the Pink News website, where personal criticism of him and his faith are rife.

But then, over the past few years we have come to expect some people to believe they are more equal than others.

Someone called Jeff Duncan even reported Mr Carvath to the police again via a police website and urged others to follow, saying,

Hiss [sic] vile homophobic hate remarks have STILL not been removed.

What these people should realise, and be very thankful for, is that we live in a society that does tolerate differences of opinion. Those who claimed to be persecuted are now the persecutors. They have become that strong and prideful tribe.