<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Real Street &#187; Prince Charles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realstreet.co.uk/tag/prince-charles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realstreet.co.uk</link>
	<description>Stewart Cowan&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is Prince Charles a eugenicist? Are you without realising?</title>
		<link>http://www.realstreet.co.uk/2010/10/is-prince-charles-a-eugenicist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realstreet.co.uk/2010/10/is-prince-charles-a-eugenicist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 03:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Cowan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eugenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10:10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defender of Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euthanasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Guidestones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King George VII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marie Stopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Philip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realstreet.co.uk/?p=2892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This is how the world&#8217;s elites view humanity &#8211; as a virus; a cancer spreading across the planet and killing it. I believe the main purpose of the environment movement is to sear images like these into people&#8217;s minds so that they will either willingly accept, or more likely, be forced to go along with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pzGs_yJk8dM?fs=1&amp;hl=en_GB" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pzGs_yJk8dM?fs=1&amp;hl=en_GB" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>This is how the world&#8217;s elites view humanity &#8211; as a virus; a cancer spreading across the planet and killing it. I believe the main purpose of the environment movement is to sear images like these into people&#8217;s minds so that they will either willingly accept, or more likely, be forced to go along with a managed reduction in population: eugenics.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.propagandamatrix.com/prince.html">Prince Philip wrote</a> in the foreword to <em>If I Were an Animal</em> (1986),</p>
<blockquote><p>In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.</p></blockquote>
<p>And in the preface to his book <em>Down to Earth </em>(1988),</p>
<blockquote><p>I don&#8217;t claim to have any special interest in natural history, but as a boy I was made aware of the annual fluctuations in the number of game animals and the need to adjust the &#8220;cull&#8221; to the size of the surplus population.</p></blockquote>
<p>With this in mind, it makes his eldest son&#8217;s latest notion sound very sinister indeed, <a href="http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2010/10/george-vii-by-grace-of-god-king-and.html">as Cranmer writes</a>,</p>
<blockquote><p>Prince Charles has disclosed not only that he wishes to be known as King George VII when he accedes to the Throne, but also that he wants to be Defender of Nature.</p></blockquote>
<p>Defender of Nature? The worry is: how much do his beliefs match his dad&#8217;s?</p>
<p>This is why I was especially incensed at <a href="http://www.realstreet.co.uk/2010/10/ecofascists-drop-their-guard/">10:10&#8217;s bloodthirsty &#8216;promotional&#8217; video</a> released the week before last. They really seemed to believe as Prince Philip does and also appeared to revel in the bloody murder of those who won&#8217;t go along with them.</p>
<p>It seems that the only difference between the Nazis and the Ecofascists is the targets to be eliminated.</p>
<p>The mysterious <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones">Georgia Guidestones</a> suggest the world&#8217;s population should be limited to half a billion people. These elite atheist globalist &#8220;Ten Commandments&#8221; are as follows. (Some of these should already be familiar as the groundwork was begun a long time ago),</p>
<blockquote><p>1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.<br />
2. Guide reproduction wisely &#8211; improving fitness and diversity.<br />
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.<br />
4. Rule passion &#8211; faith &#8211; tradition &#8211; and all things with tempered reason.<br />
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.<br />
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.<br />
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.<br />
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.<br />
9. Prize truth &#8211; beauty &#8211; love &#8211; seeking harmony with the infinite.<br />
10. Be not a cancer on the earth &#8211; Leave room for nature &#8211; Leave room for nature.</p></blockquote>
<p>Whoever was responsible for these words clearly thought that at least nine out of ten people must be eliminated.</p>
<p>Notice how much prominence that second &#8220;commandment&#8221; has in western society today: <em>Guide reproduction wisely</em>.</p>
<p>We know that eugenicists were involved in the early stages of what they called <em>family planning</em> &#8211; there&#8217;s a eugenicist-sounding term just there, but who considers it to be so? It has been made to appear totally acceptable, even wholesome.</p>
<p>As I have written about before, <a href="http://www.thelabourparty.org/royal-mail-celebrates-eugenicist-marie-stopes.htm">Marie Stopes</a>, &#8220;pioneer&#8221; of Britain&#8217;s abortion clinics, used to send her poetry to Adolf Hitler in adoration, while calling for the compulsory sterilisation of the diseased, drunkards, or simply those of bad character.</p>
<p>While that hasn&#8217;t quite happened yet, <em>family planning</em> is considered normal and many people believe that killing unborn humans is acceptable, even a &#8220;woman&#8217;s right&#8221;. This particular cull deprives many millions a year of their part in history. Their one chance gone forever due to the creeping influence of the eugenics movement and the acceptance of their beliefs via environmentalism and a completely warped notion of human rights.</p>
<p>Next stop: a euthanasia industry to match the effectiveness of the abortion factories?</p>
<p>This should easily be achieved in this age of family breakdowns and the seemingly increasing disrespect for the elderly. Old folk will be told it is their right to be <em>terminated</em> in cases of illness, even a spot of depression <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article818191.ece">or a harelip</a>. They will be encouraged to feel they are a burden to the rest of society and the environment and eventually they&#8217;ll be volunteering to jump off cliffs (or ride their wheelchairs over). There will be posters in doctors&#8217; surgeries alongside the family planning ones.</p>
<p>Who knows? Euthanasia may even be incorporated <em>into</em> family planning. For example, if you want four children, you should plan to have all the grandparents killed off by the time the fourth child arrives. It could be promoted as a double celebration: a new life comes into the world and an old timer gives his life for the planet so as to maintain humanity <em>in perpetual balance with nature</em>.</p>
<p>You could live with that, couldn&#8217;t you? Ask yourself how many of their lies you have bought up until now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realstreet.co.uk/2010/10/is-prince-charles-a-eugenicist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prince Charles still desperate to convince us on climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.realstreet.co.uk/2010/02/charles-on-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realstreet.co.uk/2010/02/charles-on-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Cowan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taking the Mickey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Charles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realstreet.co.uk/?p=1926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With more and more people becoming wise to the lies and disinformation of the environment movement over climate change, Prince Charles has tried to redress the balance by insisting we ignore the recent reports of manipulation by those we trusted to tell us the truth on the matter.
The heir to the throne raised the controversy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With more and more people becoming wise to the lies and disinformation of the environment movement over climate change, Prince Charles has tried to <a href="http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/156294/Prince-Charles-on-climate-change-Global-warming-sceptics-are-all-liars">redress the balance</a> by insisting we ignore the recent reports of manipulation by those we trusted to tell us the truth on the matter.</p>
<blockquote><p>The heir to the throne raised the controversy in a speech in Manchester, where he launched a new initiative, called Start, to provide the public with advice on how to lead more environmentally sustainable lives.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Prince had chugged through half of England in the Royal Train, which was pulled by a steam locomotive spewing out masses of CO2 into the air.</p>
<blockquote><p>He continued: “But to those who seek to persuade us that there is no such thing as climate change, in the face of the now overwhelming peer-reviewed scientific evidence, I would ask just one question. Are you prepared to take the risk of being wrong?”</p></blockquote>
<p>When the alternative is to be impoverished, spied upon and taxed to death while the elite swans around as they always have done, then yes, I am prepared to take the chance that the data didn&#8217;t need to be falsified.</p>
<p>But it did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realstreet.co.uk/2010/02/charles-on-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

