Real men don’t like going to church because they don’t want to “sing love songs to a man”, because the “vicar wears a dress”, because they feel like “mongrels on parade at Crufts” and because they want to be waited on by women rather than queue for coffee after the service.

It sounds like they asked some very strange men. Some churches here, like the local Gospel Hall and the Free Presbyterians, will have the ladies bring tea and biscuits to your seat after some services. In other churches, however, you have to fetch it yourself. Oh, what hardship!

Loving the Man who died for you is kind of the point of going, unless you just fancy sleeping through the sermon then having a cup of tea brought to you. Or not.

I don’t go to churches where men wear dresses, but I can see that this could be a problem with blokes who are unsure about themselves.

“Mongrels on parade at Crufts?” No, you’ve lost me there. In all the different churches I have visited, I have never been expected to run up and down a ramp then jump through a tyre. Not even in the Mormons.

A number of distinctly non-pc ways to get men back into church are among those being advocated by a charity, Christian Vision for Men, which has discovered that the Church has lost nearly half of its men aged under 30 because it has become too feminine.

The charity admits some of its ideas might not be seen as politically correct.

Good, you’ve got my interest.

But on a questionnaire on its website aimed at finding out why so many men have left church, they suggest a number of ways of making men want to return to church again.

These include redesigning the interiors of church buildings to make men feel more at home.

Instead of the usual flowers and statues of the Virgin Mary, they suggest, “How would it go down to decorate with swords, or pictures of knights, or flaming torches?”

Or nude calendars? Formula One cars? Wayne Rooney? Replicas of submachine guns?

The charity continues: “Maybe it’s not ‘politically correct’, but men quite like the attention of women! They also like to be waited on – so long as they are not made to feel guilty. Instead of having to queue for coffee, why not ask some of the women to go round with trays of coffee and biscuits or chocky bars? Coupled with a charming smile, many men would find that very attractive!”

Perhaps they could wear revealing clothes and blow in their ears?

Then there are the hymns, or modern worship songs, themselves.

Now, I agree with this. Some of the modern ‘hymns’ are horrible. There’s no fight in them. They’re as limp as a very limp lettuce leaf.

Quite apart from the sheer embarrassment of having to sing out loud when the tune might go too high or be in an unfamiliar key, the charity advises clergy just to look at the words.

“Jesus, I am so in love with you,” or “Beautiful one I love, beautiful one I adore,” – many men wouldn’t sing that to their wives, let alone another man, the charity advises.

It continues: “The image of church is ‘women and children’ – action songs or kid’s plays just emphasise this. The decoration is often very feminine – flowers, embroidered banners. The vicar often wears a dress… It can be embarrassing to be next to someone in uninhibited delight of worship, or in tears.”

Avoid them. Or say, ‘excuse me, I’m British and we don’t show our emotions in public in my country.’

Men don’t want to feel brainwashed by reciting words that they don’t believe: “The language can be offputting, even the word ‘love’ has undertones of the love of a man for his woman – they’d rather ‘admire’ or ‘respect’ another man. Think how they will respond if called to be Jesus’s lover, or to be ‘intimate’ with him. Don’t play into Satan’s hands by using language that he has corrupted.”

Let’s be honest. They don’t want to go to church, do they? These excuses are along the lines of ‘the dog ate my homework.’

Among the changes recommended by Christian Vision for Men, a member of the Evangelical Alliance, is to use the World Cup to boost falling congregations. The charity wants vicars to erect big screens above the pulpit during this summer’s World Cup in South Africa and even serve beer during games.

Carl Beech, General Director of the CVM and Baptist Minister, said: “The World Cup is when pretty much every bloke in the country bonds over a common goal.

“Why can that not be done in a church? The decline has been steady for a while but has accelerated over recent years.

So, you’ll get some lads coming in for the footie and a few tinnies, then they see the bloke in a dress and make a sharp U-turn.

“The problem has become male culture versus church culture. Too many sermons talk about Jesus’ love, compassion and grace which are great but not male concepts. Men want to know about his great decision making and leadership. That is what they recognise. Churches are very pastorally driven whereas blokes are looking for decisions not discussions. The breakdown in most churches is now 70 per cent women to 30 per cent men.”

More men than women go to the Free Presbyterian church I sometimes visit, but then, they haven’t sold their souls in order to be PC-compliant. And the ministers wear suits, not dresses. There isn’t even an ArmaLite or lump of Semtex on display. Or kick-boxing on the big screen.

And when did ‘love, compassion and grace’ cease being ‘male concepts’? Christ said, “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”

Hardly a lily-livered effeminate concept. I wonder how many of these men who are afraid of a man in a dress and who want waited on hand and foot would lay down their lives for their friends.

Most of the apostles were also killed by various horrible means for their beliefs. Real Christianity requires real men. If your church is lily-livered then those are the only men you will attract.

The charity, which also recommends subjects as “pornography” are discussed in church men’s groups, has also launched two Christian-themed men’s magazines in a further bid to lock into male culture.

Bishop of Lewes Wallace Benn admitted there was a problem. “The relatively small number of men in our congregations is one of the pressing issues facing the church today.

Maybe get the vicar out of a dress and into a nice comfy pair of slacks?

“Within our Christian concern for all ages, both sexes and every ethnic group, we need to address reaching men with the good news of the Gospel as a key concern.”

The Church of England have tried to address the slump in the last five years by encouraging services to be held in alternative venues such as skate parks, coffee shops and pubs under their “Fresh Expressions” scheme.

A spokesman said: “It is of concern. We do know there appears to be a higher proportion of women to men in church.”

Right, this is what you do: drop the PC baloney and preach the gospel of repentance. Transform your church into a place where men will want to come to worship their Creator. Sing proper songs of worship that are full of passion. It’s not hard. Show some football if you like, but that in itself isn’t going to convince anybody to be a Christian when the rest of the setup is corrupt.

Oh, and get the vicar to a menswear shop. Pronto!

New research shows that they [i.e. animals] can even communicate across species. Quite apart from what this article tells us about Darwinian evolution, further undermining the absurd medievalist claims of creationist fundamentalists…

After I raised this issue in the comments, Creationism became the new topic for discussion. So I asked,

What is the law that states that every thread where Creationism is even barely mentioned ends up with that as the topic? You mean there’s not one? Well, let us honour our host. Let this phenomenon be known as “Gledhill’s Law”!

Of course, what Ms Gledhill was saying is patently nonsense, as I explained,

I communicate with my dogs all the time and vice versa. Doesn’t mean we have a common ancestor that evolved from pond slime.

You don’t think the Lord created the earth to be interactive?

Science has moved on a great deal since Darwin’s ideas made him famous. Life is far more complex than he could possibly have imagined.

Why would God, who obviously knows everything, including genetics, have played dice with evolution, when He could have created man in his own image precisely as He wanted us – and straight away – using His perfect knowledge?

Nevertheless, I give you Gledhill’s Law. Let’s get this baby into the language!