I remain amazed that so many people can watch videos of 47-storey WTC Building 7 collapsing straight down in a mere seven seconds and still not feel inclined to question it, and then not be desperate to find out as much as they can about this day that changed the world. Once you start exploring the incidents and people involved, not only on the day itself, but before and after, you quickly realise things do not “add up”.
Newly obtained 9/11 eyewitness footage that NIST fought tooth and nail to keep secret contains what appears to be the sound of explosions coming from the vicinity of WTC 7 after the collapse of the twin towers, offering yet more startling evidence that the building, which was not hit by a plane yet collapsed demolition style, was deliberately imploded.
The clip [first video on link] was released by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) as part of a 3 terabyte package of video and photo data in response to a lawsuit brought by the International Center for 9/11 Studies. As we highlighted in our previous report, almost every single video studied as part of the release thus far contains damning evidence of controlled demolition on both the twin towers and WTC 7.
The fact that NIST dragged their feet for so long in an attempt to block the release of these highly incriminating videos clearly indicates that they were part of an attempted cover-up. In addition, the fact that some of the videos appear to have been edited in an effort to hide evidence of controlled demolition is another smoking gun.
The latest video is from eyewitness Richard Peskin, who filmed ground zero from a high rise building that appears to be about a dozen blocks down the street from Building 7. The first portion of the footage is filmed immediately after the collapse of the second tower of the World Trade Center. At about 10 seconds into the clip, two clear explosions can be heard.
The clip then cuts to a later time and the cameraman states, “…explosion or something because there’s a lot of police activity and sirens and more smoke rising from the ground – new smoke – so there was some kind of additional explosion but I don’t know what it was….maybe it was a federal building or something like that,” as the camera pans across a shot of WTC 7.
At around 11am – around half an hour after the collapse of the north tower of the World Trade Center and an hour after the collapse of the south tower, Peskin states, “I still hear continuing explosions, I don’t know what it is,” as small explosions can be heard in the background.
At 1:49 in the clip, a louder rumbling explosion can clearly be heard coming from the direction of WTC 7 – “That’s another explosion,” says Peskin.
The clip was contained in the NIST folder named “Richard Peskin” and is a combination of footage from the files Peskin 25.avi, Peskin 28.avi, Peskin 29.avi, and Peskin 30.avi.
In another clip released as part of the same lawsuit, we can clearly see the east penthouse of WTC 7 falling seconds before the rest of the building. NIST says that fire caused the building’s collapse, so how could the penthouse have fallen first? If you have watched the WTC7 videos via the link in the first paragraph, the penthouse collapse is unclear or deliberately edited out.
The following video shows one of the classic views of the demolition – but with the penthouse collapse included.
The article on Infowars shows videos where the penthouse collapse has been edited out.
It is also worth remembering the following from that article:
The 9/11 Commission completely ignored the hundreds of survivors, professionals, first responders, firefighters and police who reported numerous secondary explosions at all levels of the twin towers and WTC 7.
If the collapse of WTC 7 came as a result of a “new phenomenon” [thermal expansion] and an “extraordinary event” that had never happened before in the history of building collapses, then why did news stations and ground zero workers know it was about to happen an hour or more in advance?
There is also the controversy over WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein’s insurance claims.
The article concludes with this,
Of course, if authorities were ever forced to admit that WTC 7 was deliberately demolished it would then tarnish the credibility of the entire 9/11 official story, which is why NIST has engaged in an obvious cover-up to firstly withhold and then edit some of the footage in an attempt to hide the self-evident fact that Building 7 was a controlled demolition.
Reading all of Paul Joseph Watson’s piece (he is a native of Sheffield, not Hicksville, USA) is recommended.