Transgender Children

While on YouTube searching for something different, I encountered this video of an eleven year-old boy who dresses as a girl (and has done so for some time).

It is a neat follow-up to my previous post: ‘Gender-neutral’ Baby Names (and Abstaining from ‘Traditional Societal Norms’).

There is also an ABC documentary about him, a ‘charity’ called Transkids Purple Rainbow Foundation and a book, I Am Jazz.

On a more general note, Louis Theroux made a programme called “Transgender Kids“:

Louis Theroux travels to San Francisco where a group of pioneering medical professionals help children who say they were born in the wrong body transition from boy to girl or girl to boy at ever younger ages.

At the Child and Adolescent Gender Center at UCSF Hospital Louis meets children who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria. Louis is told that children as young as three can show signs of rejecting the gender they were assigned at birth, leaving parents with a difficult dilemma – do they start transitioning a child who is still developing their own identity or do they wait and risk making the change once their body has gone through the transformations of puberty?

It is a decision that can be the start of a complex series of medical interventions, from puberty blockers to hormone replacement therapy and eventually gender reassignment surgery. Louis spends time with children and their families as they negotiate their way along this life-changing journey.

What is going on? This was totally unheard of when I was growing up and I assume, for almost everyone.

I reckon that, like homosexual behaviour, feminism and humanism, the constant media conditioning has rewired many people’s brains.

On the ABC documentary, the mother says,

“We all think things like: God made me special because there aren’t very many little girls out there that have a penis”.

See what I mean? Where did this notion come from? When we were kids, we were happy to have sweets and toys, but the truth is that those Y-chromosomes mean that anyone born a boy will always be a male.

There seems to be an obsession with transgenderism and ‘transphobia’ these days: yet another opportunity to increase dysfunction in society, create more divide and conquer and another ‘hate crime’ to restrict freedom of speech.

I am not saying that “gender dysphoria” doesn’t exist or to make light of people who feel “trapped” in the “wrong” body. It cannot be pleasant, but I am sure that love and therapy are the way forward, not “gender reassignment”. How about support and prayer, common sense and straight-talking?

As for a mother, Robynn Weldon, who left a review of the book on Amazon, this is another way children are brainwashed: by their brainwashed parents,

“My 6yo daughter loves it [I Am Jazz] and I am very glad to have this fun introduction to transgender issues. I do have one objection though. The narrative strongly implies that Jazz believes she is a girl *because* she loves pink and mermaids. As a parent trying every day to battle the cultural message that girls like certain things and boys like other things, this is a problem. However, reading it with my daughter did provide a chance to start talking about that exact issue, and ultimately she concluded for herself: “I think we all have a little bit of boy AND girl in us.”

See how people now have this aversion to normal male and female traits, roles and interests?

The confusion is extreme. She doesn’t understand that the “cultural message” is not what it used to be, but is now designed to destroy our Judeo-Christian culture, values and laws.

It is very unhealthy for society. Men are becoming wimps, women more masculine (ironically, some are anti-male) and children must be becoming increasingly confused as time goes by, which simply helps the Controllers destroy society to rebuild it in their own image, as depicted in the Fabian Window.

Leave a comment

‘Gender-neutral’ Baby Names (and Abstaining from ‘Traditional Societal Norms’)

baby-hand“Gender-neutral” baby names: more proof that the world has gone bonkers.

“BabyCenter’s Global Editor in Chief Linda Murray has linked the trend to younger, more open-minded parents who have elected to abstain from traditional societal norms and gender stereotypes.”

Indeed! “Gender stereotypes” and “societal norms”  should be challenged wherever they rear their ugly bigotry! For example, I am a man with a beard. I think women should also enjoy the freedom to wear beards, whether through hormone treatment or prosthetic adornments which clip on to the ears, without feeling that they are abnormal in our society, never mind considered freaks.

Perhaps men should shake off the shackles of their societally-imposed gender-imprisonment by turning up at their favourite drinking den sporting stockings and suspenders? While talking to their confused and concerned friends, they could take out a compact from their handbag and powder their face, while complaining about the price of eggs.

“This year in particular, celebrities have been at the forefront of the gender-neutral trend by naming their daughters traditionally ‘male’ monikers such as: James (Blake Lively/Ryan Reynolds), Andy (Jack/Lisa Osbourne) and Wyatt (Mila Kunis/Ashton Kutcher).”

Of course they are! “Celebrities” are charged with the duty of leading the masses astray by subverting our culture and opening up yet more fronts on the fraudulent “equality and diversity” bandwagon aimed at creating division and moral confusion, leading to a further breakdown in society leading to our country’s destruction and takeover by a global government which doesn’t give a stuff about “gender-neutrality”, “equality”, “human rights” or any of the other cunning devices used to ensnare the naive population into accepting their own slavery through a gradual, complex series of changes in society.

Here’s a radical idea: why not seek to return to the days when men were men and women were glad of it; when there was order in society (there are/were “societal norms” for a very good reason); when families and society as a whole were successful because people knew what their role was, relatively free from this crazy confusion and when our own people ruled our country, rather than took orders from the internationalists during their long campaign of corrupting our people and institutions until they are defeated?

1 Comment

The Art of Distraction: Paedophile Politicians vs Fading Celebrities

Leg-iron was thinking about worries the other day. It seemed simpler in the 1970s when we had to worry about the Cold War becoming hot and turning our mortal bodies into radioactive dust or more likely leaving us staggering around with radiation sickness, scavenging for food and medicine in a post-apocalyptic setting.

There were worries about climate change as well back then, but it was a new ice age we were to fear. I have heard it say that the last ice age is still with us, with regard to the glaciers in New Zealand’s Southern Alps.

If this is the case and the world really is warming up – but not for the past twenty years or so – then maybe the planet is just returning to a more normal state; the way it was before the ice age and man has little or nothing to do with ‘climate change’ which is just being used to worry us into accepting global government given the power through the UN to make everyone comply with “sustainability” measures to “save the planet”.

Leg-iron makes this poignant point,

Child abuse is illegal but still happens. It’s not new. Even the scale of it is not new. Most of the cases coming to light are historic, from years back. Nobody seems much interested in stopping the abuse that will be happening right now. It’s so much easier to prosecute the old cases.

He finishes with this,

I worry about what they’re distracting us all from.

Anna Raccoon has demolished much of the historic celebrity cases; she was a pupil at Duncroft at the time Jimmy Savile was supposed to be running around abusing the girls there. The whole shebang was probably set up to distract us from what is going on in the Parliament and other seats of power and influence.

Like that ‘lord’ and former MP, Lord Janner, whose dementia seems to have prevented a trial, despite the reports of,

“Children being violated, raped and tortured – some in the very building [i.e. the Palace of Westminster] in which we now sit.”

Apparently, a “trial of the facts…would not be in the public interest”.

Just in the Portsmouth South constituency, there are characters with an unhealthy interest in children.

Their MP for many years, ousted at the G.E., is “Self-confessed teen fondler Mike Hancock”.

It has come to this,

The Tory, Labour, UKIP and even LibDem group leaders in Portsmouth have all written to Theresa May demanding that the police take action.

As Leggy says, Nobody seems much interested in stopping the abuse that will be happening right now. Especially by politicians, senior police officers, judges, senior social workers and those who procure children for these poor excuses for humanity.

Last year, the adopted child of Portsmouth South’s previous long-serving MP, the late Ralph Bonner Pink, told the Sunday Express that Pink sexually abused her “and had her packed off to Broadmoor when she was 16 to keep her quiet”.

There was another candidate caught with low-level child pornography.

All this from one constituency – that we know about. I imagine it beggars belief what goes on around the country when these sick freaks get together, probably with their Masonic chums from the police and courts.

I reckon that’s why the masses are fed a constant diet of 40 year-old stories about faded celebs.

The Romans’ “bread and circuses” is again alive and well. We get our fill of distractions: celebrities, sport, fake news, unrealistic (mainly) worries and as long as the belly is full, the people remain docile and ineffective. I have noticed in recent years how people in the “caring” services seldom give a flying fudge about those in their care, because their salary is their number one, two and three concern.

Perhaps the “obesity epidemic” is due to over-eating because of all the worries we are conditioned to react to.

Ironically, the United Nations is interested in Controlling the global obesity epidemic,

At the other end of the malnutrition scale, obesity is one of today’s most blatantly visible – yet most neglected – public health problems. Paradoxically coexisting with undernutrition, an escalating global epidemic of overweight and obesity – “globesity” – is taking over many parts of the world. If immediate action is not taken, millions will suffer from an array of serious health disorders.

Yet the WHO and other UN agencies fill our minds with worries and order national governments to implement dictatorial laws: bans, controls and all manner of restrictions in freedom, whether to “save the planet” or save workers in the hospitality sector from breathing in secondhand smoke, thus closing many businesses through loss of customers, because scraping by as unemployed is better than breathing in a wee bit of smoke in well-ventilated venues!

And is it a coincidence that this “obesity epidemic” appears to be a reaction to the greatly reduced smoking rates? Let’s look at what happened in the ‘States:

USA Smoking and obesity graphSome comments mention that this doesn’t take into account the rise of obesity in children, but if the sprogs have fat and lazy overweight and exercise-challenged parents, there is surely a greater chance that the children will follow their parents into being couch potatoes and fed on ‘lazy food’?

I have wandered somewhat from the serious problem of paedophile politicians. Naturally, this is an issue which we are not meant to worry about – but use our two minutes hate on the wicked deeds of those on benefits, decrepit celebs and the dead.

And why isn’t the whole House of Commons calling for an independent enquiry into paedophilia in politics? Maybe this is the biggest give-away to the scale of the evil?

Leave a comment

Happy Tax Freedom Day

Yes. Today is Tax Freedom Day. The Adam Smith Institute has calculated that on average we have spent the past 150 days paying tax and the money we earn for the remainder of 2015 is our own to do with as we please – as it were.

So, we have paid for the politicians’ overblown salaries and expenses, the quangos and fake charities telling us how to live (all year, not just for five months), the phoney wars, the EU protection racket money (which comes with no protection), etc. You get the idea.

For those struggling to understand the concept, there is a very short video guide for dummies (imbeciles, really) from The Telegraph. Tragically, Katie Morley, “senior personal finance reporter,” manages to get it wrong by saying that there is VAT on a bottle of milk.

Anyway, we can pretend that the money we have for the next seven months is all our own and the Dick Turpins in power don’t get a penny. Instead, we use it to pay the highway robbery of gas and electric bills, mortgage or rent on grossly overpriced housing and generally get ripped off right, left and centre on just about everything.

Mimi & Eunice'


Despite paying all that tax, it seems that David Cameron is prepared to allow a 12 year-old girl to die when the medicine to help her is sitting in a hospital cupboard.

Leave a comment

Bad Eggs in Top Jobs: Is It Inevitable?

Low-grade criminals might carry a sawn-off shotgun or excel at breaking and entering houses to pinch a few pieces of bling or cheap electronics to sell down the pub, but a life of crime with vastly better pay and conditions seems to be just waiting for those intent on wheedling their way to a top job.

It pays better and saves them getting caught with drugs or weapons or risk having to fence goods or climb up ladders into ladies’ bedrooms to steal their jewels without leaving so much as a box of Milk Tray.

The FIFA President, Sepp Blatter, is big news (again). He has had to deal with widespread corruption. He seems to consider himself to be the president of the world,

“Blatter has created himself his own world. He wants to appear like a king, like an emperor, like the Pope. He sees himself on the level of these people. He can be terribly ruthless. I’ve heard people say he would sell his own grandmother. When it serves him – and when his power is at stake – he will do almost anything to defend it.

The 79 year-old has been president since 1998 and is seeking a fifth term in today’s election where he faces Jordanian Prince Ali bin al-Hussein.

Blatter later vowed to restore trust in Fifa and “find a way to fix things”. 

After nearly twenty years in the job, that might be a good idea. It reminds me of the EU failing to keep their accounts in order for about the same length of time.

They are all “kings” and “princes” now. Accountability? Meh.

But Mr Blatter denies responsibility. It’s the others, you see…

Swiss prosecutors plan to interview 10 Fifa executive committee members as part of a separate investigation into the bidding process for the World Cup tournaments in 2018 in Russia and 2022 in Qatar.

Like the EU, it’s not someone’s lunch money which goes missing or the pilfering of biros from the stationery cupboards, but seven FIFA officials, including the Vice-president, have been charged with receiving over $150 million in bribes,

In total, 14 defendants were charged by the US Department of Justice with racketeering, wire fraud and money laundering conspiracies in a 24-year scheme.

How it is done

“Blatter has an incredible talent in judging other people, in seeing their weaknesses, detecting them and making use of these weaknesses at the right moment. He’s able to charm people and he also studies the circumstances around people – how they react in certain situations.

“And then he sets up his plan, using these people. Once he decides to move, he has everyone in place and he can play his cards accordingly. And people react the way he expects them to react.

It’s like a standard blueprint for those intent on power. If we compare it with UK politics we can see why that is also so corrupt and unaccountable.

Apparently, David Cameron is embarking on a “charm offensive” with European leaders.

France has accused David Cameron of trying to “dismantle” the European Union and suggested it will block his plans to claw back powers from Brussels.

Laurent Fabius, the French foreign minister, said that the referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU is “very risky” and “quite dangerous”.

He said that Britain had “joined a football club” and cannot decide “in the middle of the match that they want to play rugby”.

Bravo to M. Fabius for the football metaphor to aid the transition of themes here.

I think the French are in on Mr Cameron’s “EU Referendum” joke and that the European Establishment has no need to fear. Cameron is a Machiavellian who, like Herr Blatter, collects people whose weaknesses he can exploit.

Why was Cameron a chosen one? As the Grauniad explains,

Cameron learned about the value of spin during a previous career as director of corporate affairs for television company Carlton, now part of ITV, his only professional excursion beyond the cosseted world of Westminster.

And Eton was just the place to both work his way up the greasy pole and as the years passed, to rise to fag-master and have roles reversed as an army of slaves was available to practise on.


‘Head boys: How we imagine Boris Johnson, Bill Coles and David Cameron would have joined forces at Eton.’

I can imagine them inventing their own ‘EC’ (Eton College) regulations to convince their fags to engage in the most ridiculous, unfair and embarrassing behaviour which turn their subjects into little more than dehumanised serfs. Just like they do to the rest of us when they reach high office.

One abiding memory [of Eton] was the ‘ boy-calls’, where one of the senior boys would bellow ‘BoooyUpppp’. Every fag would drop what they were doing and race up the stairs to the Library – the last one got ‘fagged off’ to wherever the Librarian thought fit to send him.

Almost any behaviour was permitted as the fags swarmed up the stairs. Tripping, shoving and elbowing were all viewed as acceptable – even laudable – methods of trying to waylay your panting compadres. This was perfect preparation for future MPs as they try to claw their way up the greasy pole of state.

Having been voted back into Number 10 by his fags, Cameron can get back to his dirty tricks about our EU membership and his fabled “Referendum”.

Can the French really be fooled? Non, monsieur! Is Frau Merkel losing her beauty sleep over Cameron’s games? Nein! It’s just Jeux Sans Frontières, but the leaders’ heads are plenty big enough without the need for papier-mâché ones to be made.

Even if the Referendum does go ahead, Cameron and his fellow fag-masters will make sure that the insufficiently-educated fags with a vote are taunted, traumatised and terrified into wanting to stay in.

Leave a comment

Just About to Give Up Blogging When…

Wikio rankings 05-2015For the past few weeks I have been considering what to write as a final blog post, when I checked the (former Wikio) top political blogs list to find myself in the Top 100 for the first time, at number 98.

When I was regularly blogging a few years ago and attracting hundreds of comments I was perpetually stuck between positions 101 and 200, so I don’t understand how I have suddenly “made it”.

It could all be about possible new “metrics” which the boffins have devised to entertain themselves and earn some overtime.

Or maybe lots of bloggers have given up, like I intended. I have reached the point where I seem to have said the same things a dozen times and for what?

I know a lot of bloggers who really care about the state this country is in and hope to change things by writing about it or just need to get things off their chests lest their heads explode with frustration.

Some have rounded up online posses who discuss, often, single issues like the smoking ban and all the associated control freakery which has passed into law via the WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and the spread of this people-herding into other areas, like alcohol and food.

Because they have been herding us like cattle. One day they will insist on branding us like cattle too, with an implanted microchip or a barcode tattoo or some other device.

When the General Election results came through that Cameron;’s “Conservatives” had won an overall majority and that all but three Scottish seats had been won by the SNP, the worst control freaks I know of in UK politics, I decided it was definitely a good time to cease blogging, because after all these years of online activism (which began years before I started this blog), the masses still want to be ruled by their persecutors. They will pay a premium for designer RFID chips.

I have no idea how many bloggers think to themselves that people in high places will read their opinions and grumble to themselves and admit they got it wrong and set about changing things.

I used to think that by commenting on politicians’ blogs they would finally understand the real world and shrug off the European federalist, nanny state, multicultural disaster they helped create, in which there are so many healthist and safety regulations they expect us all to live as long as our forebears in antediluvian times, i.e. over 900 years old.

Then some of them complain that people are “living too long” and are a “strain” on the NHS, despite attempts to kill off people through lack of basic hygiene, the Liverpool Care Pathway, misdiagnoses by overworked staff, general neglect and of course, abortion.

I will try and write a few posts this week and if I drop out the Top 100, the blog gets it!


The REAL Latest Opinion Poll – Land of Confusion

This is the latest Election opinion poll (Guardian/ICM).


Guardian/ICM poll published 6/5/15, the day before the General Election.

With Labour and the Tories neck and neck, commanding 70% of the intentions and the Lib Dems on 9%, four out of five people must be satisfied with the governments of the past umpteen years, such as the debt they have amassed with their kamikaze economics which are sinking us, their dereliction of duty (treason) by signing away our country for fake security, taking us into false wars while cutting back on service personnel, and using subversion and mass immigration to create a dysfunctional land of confusion which can more easily be controlled.

In my view, this is what that pie chart really represents:Real Poll

The pretty coloured doughnut ring in the Guardian deceives. How is your ‘team’ doing? Based on their recent past performances, why do you intend giving them yet another chance? For those not intending to vote for UKIP and want a chance (if we still have one) to save our country and freedoms please tell me why you want increasingly draconian laws thrust upon you from outside; why you enjoy being fleeced left, right and centre with many different taxes; why you hate your country so much that you consistently vote for those who have been systematically destroying it because they do not believe it is a place worth fighting for.

I would really like to know.

“I won’t be coming home tonight
My generation will put it right
We’re not just making promises
That we know, we’ll never keep.

“Too many men
Too many people
Making too many problems
And not much love to go round
Can’t you see
This is a land of confusion.

“This is the world we live in
And these are the hands we’re given
Use them and let’s start trying
To make it a place worth fighting for.”

Leave a comment

A Homosexual Tug of War


Tempers fray, people snap and the dangerous game to change society appears almost over.

I am going to concentrate on an article criticising a recent gathering of Christians in London who were discussing homosexuality, but first, the news that the same-sex “marriage” vote in Northern Ireland that I mentioned last week has resulted in rejection – for the fourth time.

It was mighty close, though, at 49 votes to 47, but I don’t doubt that any future vote by MLAs will produce the “required” result. Some issues just keep on going so that the World can become one big homogenised mess of moral relativism leading to confusion, depression and the ultimate collapse of our culture.

The Belfast Telegraph reports (complete with obligatory picture of “wedding” cake with two men),

DUP Assembly member Peter Weir said his party opposed same sex marriages.

“This is not a serious debate. Clearly this motion is an attack on the symbolism of marriage and the institution of marriage and an attempt to redefine marriage.

“My party believes, and I believe also, that marriage is between one man and one woman and once you redefine that you lose the essence of marriage itself.”

The piece continues with a quote from a Sinn Fein MLA. Note the typical abusive diatribe attacking people who think differently.

The motion was brought forward by Sinn Fein.

South Down MLA Catriona Ruane said they wanted to “drown out the bile” put forward by opponents of equal marriage.

She said: “Together we will build a society that includes and embraces.”

If you thought “The Troubles” were about religion, well, Sinn Fein don’t look like “good Catholics” do they? More like agents of subversion.

The other main Nationalist party is quoted coming out with similar mush, because people think with their emotions nowadays more than with the brains they were born with. Constant conditioning has made those particular organs fairly redundant, at least for the purpose of thinking. They now seem to exist primarily to control the body’s necessary functions.

Meanwhile, the SDLP’s Colm Eastwood said: “We need to be seen to be embracing all members of our community.

“There is no reason why the north of Ireland should be the only place on these islands that doesn’t have marriage available to same sex couples.”

See what I mean? Absolutely no proper reasoning. I expect Tony Blair thought it was a jolly good idea for UK forces to bomb Iraq to smithereens because the USA had decided it was a jolly good idea. Or a mighty fine idea.

Incidentally, I see that Amnesty has stuck its oar in. Remember when they used to fight for sensible issues that affected people terribly, like those facing death or being jailed and beaten for their beliefs? Now we learn that,

Northern Ireland is a discriminatory backwater for gay and lesbian people, a human rights organisation has claimed.

Amnesty International also warned that a legal challenge was likely if a proposal legalising same-sex marriage was rejected by the region’s devolved Assembly tomorrow.

Patrick Corrigan, Amnesty’s programme director, said: “Marriage should be available to same-sex couples in Northern Ireland, just as it is in Scotland, England and Wales and may soon be in the Republic of Ireland.

So, if we see people throwing themselves off a cliff, so should we. No need to reason.

Hold on! A legal challenge?

“If politicians again abdicate their responsibilities, once more it will be left to the courts to uphold the right of all citizens not to face discrimination.”

It reminds me of the title of that Clint Eastwood film, Any Which Way You Can.

Finally, onto the main subject of this post. One of Anna Raccoon’s recommended reads at the weekend was by Tchernookova Alice on “The News Hub” writing about the:

“hard–core Christian believers gathered at the Emmanuel Centre in Westminster for a supposedly innocent and open debate around the “issue” of being gay, in spite of attempts by the LGBT community to have the event cancelled.”

What followed was an extremely unobjective piece which missed quite a few important aspects about the society we live in and the freedoms we expect.

Straight from the starting gates, we learn that the event had been targeted by LGBT groups for closure on the grounds that some people didn’t agree with the subject matter – people who, not so long ago, fought for all manner of “rights” they deemed they deserved but who now seek to deny others even the freedom of assembly.

Having made very good use of “human rights” legislation themselves (laws which, when you read between the lines give all rights to the State), these same groups would deny others entitlement to Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights:

Article 11 – Freedom of assembly and association

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Tchernookova Alice seemed aggrieved that “gay conversion therapy” even exists, as if to deny those with unwanted same-sex desire to be free to consult with some kind of specialist.

In fact, on both sides of the Atlantic, there have been significant moves to ban practitioners from offering such a service.

We would see more important rights disappearing. In this case property rights and freedom of association and assembly. It would leave the person who wants treatment and is prepared to pay for it to be denied it.

What has been happening, piecemeal, is the re-engineering of society to accept homosexual relationships as normal. I have never heard of a homosexual seeking help for unwanted opposite-sex attraction, therefore nobody can be allowed therapy if the situation is reversed?

“Equality” was never about everyone being equal, though.

Tchernookova Alice continues:

“Now, how can you not start feeling uncomfortable when you are told that Great Britain is “a heart-broken nation that needs to be redeemed,” or “a confused and hurting nation” in which reigns “absolute chaos,” and that “our ruling elite are a shame to Jesus Christ”?”

Everyone should feel very uncomfortable at the way the UK is going down the pan: economically, morally, spiritually, intellectually and every way.

In surveys, UK children are often found to be among the unhappiest in the Western world.

When she writes, “Hell knows why gay life should be “prohibited”,” she clearly does not appreciate what faith is, about sin and its consequences and about repentance and the hope of salvation.

She considered the speakers to be “a bunch of bigoted religious fanatics who refuse to see the world change and evolve and to question their principles, and who most of all, are afraid of the unknown.”

As I said, her piece was not at all objective. God is unchanging: the same yesterday, today and tomorrow, therefore the fads of the day are to be resisted if they compete with sound doctrine.

As for refusing to see the world change and evolve, they see it clearly and they see the effects, hence their concern.

Who is afraid of the unknown? I would say it is Tchernookova Alice who seems afraid of just about everything she has written about here such as the people attending the debate and the subject matter (like therapies and opinions she either disapproves of or does not understand).

She also totally fails to grasp the concept behind this phrase used at the meeting, “unresolved identification with your own gender,” concerning Andrew Comiskey who was helped to overcome his same-sex desire (by “an army of morons” we are told).

The remainder of the article is more failure to grasp what the debate was about, as various speakers offered their expertise and opinions.

Tchernookova Alice wonders why conversion therapies exist in the first place.

Because people ask for them: supply and demand.

She did make me almost smile when she wrote, “But these people don’t seem prepared to compromise on the topic,” without even a hint of irony.

She writes, “Teaching about equality and tolerance is apparently “propaganda” though, not education, in her [Lisa Noland’s] view.”

Indeed, it is propaganda. For example, four years ago, Stonewall encouraged staff at primary schools to teach children as young as five about same-sex relationships and that boys should be allowed to express their feminine sides by dressing in frocks or becoming cheerleaders.

Some of us are resisting the “progressive” politics of today because we know the reason behind them. Former KGB subversion agent, Yuri Bezmenov, explained thirty years ago that the USSR was promoting “equality” in the West to subvert our culture, to weaken it to take over.

Of course, the agenda has been rolling along for generations now. For example, the Fabian Society, formed in 1884, was set up to advance socialism by very gradual changes.

The stained-glass Fabian Window, now on display at the LSE, depicts the Fabians smashing up the world to refashion it in their own image.

With a tortoise as their logo, they knew that they had to move very slowly to spread their socialism.

Total socialist control involves weakening the family so that the State assumes the role of surrogate parent who can micromanage us. To quote again DUP MLA Peter Weir,

“My party believes, and I believe also, that marriage is between one man and one woman and once you redefine that you lose the essence of marriage itself.”

And families are the essential building blocks of society and once these are undermined, we begin to lose our country of order and relative freedom and tolerance.

“Equality” for the few can remove freedoms from everyone else. Take the Christian B&B owners who wish to only allow married (i.e. opposite-sex couples) to share a double bed. They are no longer permitted to. Their property rights have been destroyed; their right to conscientious objection rejected, as if somebody’s “sexuality” is more important than someone else’s faith.

How is this equality? It is not.

Religion itself must be viciously attacked to usher in the seemingly impending socialist “Utopia.”

As Lenin said, “Our programme necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism.”

Same-sex “marriage” is pure ideological subversion. Consider that, prior to the past few years of “political correctness gone mad” no government or monarch has legalised same-sex “marriage” anywhere in the world at any time in history.

This is because they knew the importance of families and children and wanted to keep their dominions as solid as possible.

The socialists have succeeded in using many divide and conquer techniques to set citizen against citizen. We can see just how effective this has been in Tchernookova Alice’s article.

The result of all this is tragic. Freedoms are disappearing, society is fragmenting, our country is being sucked into the socialist European Union and will one day not exist as an independent nation.

The latter has already happened, in effect, as a great number of our laws are made in Brussels – many via the United Nations, which has also been given great power over us by traitor politicians over the decades.

People need to understand that “progressive” policies are generally regressive ones, damaging society and the individual.

The only hope we have is to go back to our Judeo-Christian roots and reassert our independence and strengthen our communities by living according to the tried and tested ways of family, faith and country.

Leave a comment

What happens to marriage and families when the law recognises “Same-Sex Marriage”?

This is the title of a submission to HoC Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill Committee from two years ago. The subtitle is Experience of legalising marriage for same-sex couples
in Europe and North America.

It examines the claims that same-sex “marriage” strengthens the institution rather than dilutes it. These were the findings produced for SPUC based on research and data from
Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain, Canada the US, and
concludes that:

• As marriage is redefined to accommodate same-sex couples, this
reinforces the idea that marriage is irrelevant to parenthood.

• Same sex marriage leads to the casualisation of heterosexual unions and
separation of marriage and parenthood.

• Spain saw a pronounced acceleration in the decline of marriage following
the introduction of same-sex marriage (same-sex marriage was introduced
at the same time as the ‘express divorce bill’).

• Across all countries analysed no causal link has been established to
support the idea that same-sex marriage prevents marital decline.

• In the move to same-sex marriage, opposite-sex relationships have to
conform to gay norms rather than vice-versa.

• A publicly professed, legal, partnership does not prevent homosexual
couples from breaking up more frequently than married heterosexual

• Experience with same-sex partnerships/marriage legislation tends to
suggest that availability is all, and participation more or less irrelevant to
sexual minorities.

• Same-sex marriage may be the end-game of long-running anti-marriage,
anti-family policy typified by Sweden.

• Same-sex marriage may begin the process of severing marriage from
family in otherwise family-friendly societies such as Spain and the

• Same-sex marriage triggers dismemberment of family structures in family-
friendly societies.

It ends with this caveat:

*Note: We introduce the term “same-sex marriage” with quotation marks
because it is not really marriage – but in the text we ask the reader to take
the distinction as read.

Three years ago, I wrote about The Hidden Dangers of ‘Gay Marriage’.

I quoted from Cranmer’s post on the then Equalities Minister’s plans for same-sex “marriage”:

“But the state does not ‘own’ marriage, either, Ms Featherstone. It is a union observed in all cultures and, according to Aristotle, exists by nature. The state cannot change nature: it can legislate to call the rain ‘sunshine’, but the rain is still the rain; it’s neither good nor bad; it’s just the rain. And it will still make you wet, whatever you call it.”

He adds that, “Marriage is essential for the functioning of society.”

Which is exactly why it is being diluted.

More in my next post and then hopefully a change of subject.

See also: Scotland and Gomorrah.

Leave a comment

Ireland Succumbing to Homosexual Subversion, North and South?

In a month’s time there is a referendum in the Republic of Ireland proposing to introduce same-sex “marriage”.

In the North next week a Sinn Féin motion, below, is to be debated in Stormont:

That this Assembly welcomes the marriage equality referendum in the south of Ireland; notes that a growing number of parliaments across the world have embraced, and legislated for, marriage equality; respects the rights of the religious institutions to define, observe and practise marriage within their beliefs; and calls on the Executive to legislate for marriage equality for same sex couples so that all citizens will have the same legal entitlement to the protections, responsibilities, rights, obligations and benefits afforded by the legal institution of marriage.

I read that Sinn Féin is “vigorously” campaigning to re-define marriage in the South. Not only is such a thing anathema, it is cultural subversion. The “equality” agenda has been used for decades to destroy our Western culture. The USSR knew they could exert control easier by using subversion rather than bombs and bullets. Sinn Féin are slow learners!

And I see objectors are described as “bigots”. How original and Pavlovian!

It shows how utterly brainwashed these people are, considering that no government or monarchy legalised same-sex “marriage” in any country in the world at any time in history – not even once – until “PC went mad” a few years ago? Was everyone a “bigot” throughout history, absolutely everywhere? Just “unenlightened,” I imagine!!

The Presbyterian Church released a statement saying,

The Presbyterian Church in Ireland upholds the historic – and Christian – view of marriage as exclusively between one man and one woman. We affirm that it is needed for the common good of society.

In recognising the rights of all people within a democracy, we must include the rights of children, and the natural responsibilities of a father and a mother in their nurture. We believe the change proposed in the referendum denies these rights.

A redefinition of marriage would establish new norms within our society, the implications of which have not been fully explored.

We acknowledge that this is an intensely emotive subject and trust that all will engage in the debate with gentleness and respect as we approach the Referendum.

And same-sex unions harm the innocence of children, say Nigerian Catholic bishops,

This Conference will attempt to show the lie of same-sex unions as a grossly disordered phenomenon which should never be given legal status in Nigeria. The adoption or promotion of same-sex unions undermines the right to life, right to freedom of conscience, religious liberty, respect for moral and cultural values, etc. It also harms the innocence of children, degrades marriage and family life and destabilizes society, now and in the future.

That’s the whole point, of course. It’s why the KGB spread “equality” in the West and why their brethren in countless other socialist organisations are doing likewise. I’m sure that most of them couldn’t care less about homosexuals; they are a means to an end.


NEXT POST: The harm done to society by legitimising same-sex unions.